Meta-analysis of genetic association studies under heterogeneity

In multi-cohort genetic association studies or meta-analysis, associations of genetic variants with complex traits across cohorts may be heterogeneous because of genuine genetic diversity or differential biases or errors. To detect the associations of genes with heterogeneous associations across cohorts, new global fixed-effect (FE) and random-effects (RE) meta-analytic methods have been recently proposed. These global methods had improved power over both traditional FE and RE methods under heterogeneity in limited simulation scenarios and data application, but their usefulness in a wide range of practical situations is not clear. We assessed the performance of these methods for both binary and quantitative traits in extensive simulations and applied them to a multi-cohort association study. We found that these new approaches have higher power to detect mostly the very small to small associations of common genetic variants when associations are highly heterogeneous across cohorts. They worked well when both the underlying and assumed genetic models are either multiplicative or dominant. But, they offered no clear advantage for less common variants unless heterogeneity was substantial. In conclusion, these new meta-analytic methods can be used to detect the association of genetic variants with high heterogeneity, which can then be subjected to further exploration, in multi-cohort association studies and meta-analyses.

[1]  Eleazar Eskin,et al.  Random-effects model aimed at discovering associations in meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. , 2011, American journal of human genetics.

[2]  R. Collins,et al.  Newly identified loci that influence lipid concentrations and risk of coronary artery disease , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[3]  Theo Stijnen,et al.  Dealing with Heterogeneity between Cohorts in Genomewide SNP Association Studies , 2010, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[4]  T. Hudson,et al.  Genetic Variants and Susceptibility to Neurological Complications Following West Nile Virus Infection , 2011, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[5]  Siobhan M. Dolan,et al.  Assessment of cumulative evidence on genetic associations: interim guidelines. , 2008, International journal of epidemiology.

[6]  L. Cardon,et al.  Aspects of observing and claiming allele flips in association studies , 2009, Genetic Epidemiology.

[7]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[8]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  Required sample size and nonreplicability thresholds for heterogeneous genetic associations , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  Discovery properties of genome-wide association signals from cumulatively combined data sets. , 2009, American journal of epidemiology.

[11]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  John P.A. Ioannidis,et al.  Non-Replication and Inconsistency in the Genome-Wide Association Setting , 2007, Human Heredity.

[13]  Vincent Plagnol,et al.  Meta-analysis of genome-wide association study data identifies additional type 1 diabetes risk loci , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[14]  Evangelos Evangelou,et al.  Heterogeneity in Meta-Analyses of Genome-Wide Association Investigations , 2007, PloS one.

[15]  Eden R Martin,et al.  No gene is an island: the flip-flop phenomenon. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[16]  T. Hudson,et al.  Genetic Variants Associated With Myocardial Infarction Risk Factors in Over 8000 Individuals From Five Ethnic Groups: The INTERHEART Genetics Study , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics.

[17]  Francis S Collins,et al.  A HapMap harvest of insights into the genetics of common disease. , 2008, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[18]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data and large-scale replication identifies additional susceptibility loci for type 2 diabetes , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[19]  Peter M Visscher,et al.  Prediction of individual genetic risk of complex disease. , 2008, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[20]  Steven Gallinger,et al.  Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies four new susceptibility loci for colorectal cancer , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[21]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  On the synthesis and interpretation of consistent but weak gene-disease associations in the era of genome-wide association studies. , 2007, International journal of epidemiology.

[22]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  The Emergence of Networks in Human Genome Epidemiology: Challenges and Opportunities , 2007, Epidemiology.

[23]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Methods for meta-analysis in genetic association studies: a review of their potential and pitfalls , 2008, Human Genetics.

[24]  W. G. Cochran The combination of estimates from different experiments. , 1954 .