On the Power of Randomization in Algorithmic Mechanism Design

In many settings the power of truthful mechanisms is severely bounded. In this paper we use randomization to overcome this problem. In particular, we construct an FPTAS for multi-unit auctions that is truthful in expectation, whereas there is evidence that no polynomial-time truthful deterministic mechanism provides an approximation ratio better than 2. We also show for the first time that truthful in expectation polynomial-time mechanisms are provably stronger than polynomial-time universally truthful mechanisms. Specifically, we show that there is a setting in which: (1) there is a non-polynomial time truthful mechanism that always outputs the optimal solution, and that (2) no universally truthful randomized mechanism can provide an approximation ratio better than 2 in polynomial time, but (3) an FPTAS that is truthful in expectation exists.

[1]  Elchanan Mossel,et al.  Inapproximability for VCG-based combinatorial auctions , 2010, SODA '10.

[2]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[3]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Truthful mechanisms for one-parameter agents , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing.

[4]  N. Nisan Introduction to Mechanism Design (for Computer Scientists) , 2007 .

[5]  Chaitanya Swamy,et al.  Truthful and near-optimal mechanism design via linear programming , 2005, 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'05).

[6]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Limitations of VCG-based mechanisms , 2007, STOC '07.

[7]  Berthold Vöcking,et al.  Approximation Techniques for Utilitarian Mechanism Design , 2011, SIAM J. Comput..

[8]  Ron Lavi,et al.  Algorithmic Mechanism Design , 2008, Encyclopedia of Algorithms.

[9]  Noam Nissan,et al.  Bidding Languages , 2004 .

[10]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Algorithmic game theory , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[11]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Computationally feasible vcg-based mechanisms , 2000 .

[12]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Towards a characterization of truthful combinatorial auctions , 2003, 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings..

[13]  Shahar Dobzinski,et al.  Two Randomized Mechanisms for Combinatorial Auctions , 2007, APPROX-RANDOM.

[14]  Uriel Feige,et al.  On maximizing welfare when utility functions are subadditive , 2006, STOC '06.

[15]  Noam Nisan,et al.  The communication requirements of efficient allocations and supporting prices , 2006, J. Econ. Theory.

[16]  Subhash Suri,et al.  Approximately-strategyproof and tractable multi-unit auctions , 2003, EC '03.

[17]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Truthful approximation mechanisms for restricted combinatorial auctions , 2008, Games Econ. Behav..

[18]  Aranyak Mehta,et al.  Randomized truthful auctions of digital goods are randomizations over truthful auctions , 2004, EC '04.

[19]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Mechanisms for multi-unit auctions , 2007, EC '07.

[20]  Elchanan Mossel,et al.  Combinatorial Auctions : VC v . VCG , 2008 .

[21]  Shahar Dobzinski,et al.  On characterizations of truthful mechanisms for combinatorial auctions and scheduling , 2008, EC '08.

[22]  Jan Vondrák,et al.  Optimal approximation for the submodular welfare problem in the value oracle model , 2008, STOC.

[23]  Éva Tardos,et al.  An approximate truthful mechanism for combinatorial auctions with single parameter agents , 2003, SODA '03.

[24]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Truthful Approximation Schemes for Single-Parameter Agents , 2008, 2008 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[25]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  On the Hardness of Being Truthful , 2008, 2008 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[26]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Truthful randomized mechanisms for combinatorial auctions , 2006, STOC '06.