Current distribution in tissues with conducted electrical weapons operated in drive-stun mode

Introduction: The TASER® conducted electrical weapon (CEW) is best known for delivering electrical pulses that can temporarily incapacitate subjects by overriding normal motor control. The alternative drive-stun mode is less understood and the goal of this paper is to analyze the distribution of currents in tissues when the CEW is operated in this mode. Methods and Results: Finite element modeling (FEM) was used to approximate current density in tissues with boundary electrical sources placed 40 mm apart. This separation was equivalent to the distance between drive-stun mode TASER X26™, X26P, X2 CEW electrodes located on the device itself and between those located on the expended CEW cartridge. The FEMs estimated the amount of current flowing through various body tissues located underneath the electrodes. The FEM simulated the attenuating effects of both a thin and of a normal layer of fat. The resulting current density distributions were used to compute the residual amount of current flowing through deeper layers of tissue. Numerical modeling estimated that the skin, fat and skeletal muscle layers passed at least 86% or 91% of total CEW current, assuming a thin or normal fat layer thickness, respectively. The current density and electric field strength only exceeded thresholds which have increased probability for ventricular fibrillation (VFTJ), or for cardiac capture (CCTE), in the skin and the subdermal fat layers. Conclusion: The fat layer provided significant attenuation of drive-stun CEW currents. Beyond the skeletal muscle layer, only fractional amounts of the total CEW current were estimated to flow. The regions presenting risk for VF induction or for cardiac capture were well away from the typical heart depth.

[1]  T. Chan,et al.  Evaluation of the ventilatory effects of a restraint chair on human subjects. , 2011, Journal of Emergency Medicine.

[2]  Hongyu Sun,et al.  Taser Dart-to-Heart Distance That Causes Ventricular Fibrillation in Pigs , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  J. Webster,et al.  Estimating the probability that the Taser® directly causes human ventricular fibrillation , 2010, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[4]  D. Panescu,et al.  Optimization of cardiac defibrillation by three-dimensional finite element modeling of the human thorax , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Patrick J. Tchou,et al.  Abstract 115: Relationship of Body Mass Index (BMI) to Minimum Distance from Skin Surface to Myocardium: Implications for Neuromuscular Incapacitating Devices (NMID) , 2007 .

[6]  J. Patrick Reilly,et al.  Applied Bioelectricity: From Electrical Stimulation to Electropathology , 1998 .

[7]  Brian P. Martin,et al.  Safety and injury profile of conducted electrical weapons used by law enforcement officers against criminal suspects. , 2009, Annals of emergency medicine.

[8]  Dorin Panescu,et al.  Electrical safety of conducted electrical weapons relative to requirements of relevant electrical standards , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[9]  Dorin Panescu,et al.  Cardiac fibrillation risks with TASER conducted electrical weapons , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[10]  S J Stratton,et al.  Factors associated with sudden death of individuals requiring restraint for excited delirium. , 2001, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[11]  A. Wallace,et al.  Factors Determining Vulnerability to Ventricular Fibrillation Induced by 60‐CPS Alternating Current , 1967, Circulation research.

[12]  Dorin Panescu,et al.  The sternum as an electrical shield , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.