Examining the Electro-Neural Interface of Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychophysics, CT Scans, and Speech Understanding

This study examines the relationship between focused-stimulation thresholds, electrode positions, and speech understanding in deaf subjects treated with a cochlear implant (CI). Focused stimulation is more selective than monopolar stimulation, which excites broad regions of the cochlea, so may be more sensitive as a probe of neural survival patterns. Focused thresholds are on average higher and more variable across electrodes than monopolar thresholds. We presume that relatively high focused thresholds are the result of larger distances between the electrodes and the neurons. Two factors are likely to contribute to this distance: (1) the physical position of electrodes relative to the modiolus, where the excitable auditory neurons are normally located, and (2) the pattern of neural survival along the length of the cochlea, since local holes in the neural population will increase the distance between an electrode and the nearest neurons. Electrode-to-modiolus distance was measured from high-resolution CT scans of the cochleae of CI users whose focused-stimulation thresholds were also measured. A hierarchical set of linear models of electrode-to-modiolus distance versus threshold showed a significant increase in threshold with electrode-to-modiolus distance (average slope = 11 dB/mm). The residual of these models was hypothesized to reflect neural survival in each subject. Consonant–Nucleus–Consonant (CNC) word scores were significantly correlated with the within-subject variance of threshold (r2 = 0.82), but not with within-subject variance of electrode distance (r2 = 0.03). Speech understanding also significantly correlated with how well distance explained each subject’s threshold data (r2 = 0.63). That is, subjects with focused thresholds that were well described by electrode position had better speech scores. Our results suggest that speech understanding is highly impacted by individual patterns of neural survival and that these patterns manifest themselves in how well (or poorly) electrode position predicts focused thresholds.

[1]  Richard A. Robb,et al.  The biomedical imaging resource at Mayo Clinic , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Donald K. Eddington,et al.  Histopathology of Cochlear Implants in Humans , 2001, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[3]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Filiep Vanpoucke,et al.  Assessing the Placement of a Cochlear Electrode Array by Multidimensional Scaling , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  R J Glynn,et al.  Survival of Spiral Ganglion Cells in Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Implications for Cochlear Implantation , 1989, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[6]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. , 1962, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[7]  G M Clark,et al.  Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. , 1998, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[8]  J. Nadol,et al.  Is Word Recognition Correlated With the Number of Surviving Spiral Ganglion Cells and Electrode Insertion Depth in Human Subjects With Cochlear Implants? , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[9]  Soha N. Garadat,et al.  Erratum: Across-site patterns of modulation detection: Relation to speech recognition [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 4030–4041 (2012)] , 2013 .

[10]  Chris van den Honert,et al.  Focused intracochlear electric stimulation with phased array channels. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Karen M Mispagel,et al.  Factors Affecting Open-Set Word Recognition in Adults With Cochlear Implants , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[12]  T. Hullar,et al.  Verification of Computed Tomographic Estimates of Cochlear Implant Array Position: A Micro-CT and Histologic Analysis , 2011, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[13]  Alexander M. Hetherington,et al.  Effects of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) and Electrical Stimulation on Survival and Function of Cochlear Spiral Ganglion Neurons in Deafened, Developing Cats , 2013, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[14]  Peter S Roland,et al.  Surgical aspects of cochlear implantation: mechanisms of insertional trauma. , 2006, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[15]  Bryan E. Pfingst,et al.  Across-Site Variation in Detection Thresholds and Maximum Comfortable Loudness Levels for Cochlear Implants , 2004, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[16]  D. Basta,et al.  The “pull-back” technique for Nucleus 24 perimodiolar electrode insertion , 2005, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[17]  Sharon G. Kujawa,et al.  Age-Related Primary Cochlear Neuronal Degeneration in Human Temporal Bones , 2011, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[18]  Gary H. McClelland,et al.  Data analysis: A model comparison approach (2nd ed.). , 2009 .

[19]  Bryan E. Pfingst,et al.  Across-Site Threshold Variation in Cochlear Implants: Relation to Speech Recognition , 2004, Audiology and Neurotology.

[20]  L M Collins,et al.  Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  A. Wise,et al.  Chronic neurotrophin delivery promotes ectopic neurite growth from the spiral ganglion of deafened cochleae without compromising the spatial selectivity of cochlear implants , 2013, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[22]  A. Voie,et al.  Imaging the intact guinea pig tympanic bulla by orthogonal-plane fluorescence optical sectioning microscopy , 2002, Hearing Research.

[23]  Julie Arenberg Bierer,et al.  Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  J. Fayad,et al.  Multichannel Cochlear Implants: Relation of Histopathology to Performance , 2006, The Laryngoscope.

[25]  Margaret W Skinner,et al.  In Vivo Estimates of the Position of Advanced Bionics Electrode Arrays in the Human Cochlea , 2007, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[26]  B. Papsin,et al.  From Nucleus 24 to 513: Changing Cochlear Implant Design Affects Auditory Response Thresholds , 2013, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[27]  Christopher J. Long,et al.  Multipolar current focusing increases spectral resolution in cochlear implants , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[28]  Bryan E Pfingst,et al.  Across-site patterns of modulation detection: relation to speech recognition. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Elaine Saunders,et al.  Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode array , 2001, Hearing Research.

[30]  Julie Arenberg Bierer,et al.  Probing the Electrode-Neuron Interface With Focused Cochlear Implant Stimulation , 2010 .

[31]  L Whitford,et al.  Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. , 1996, Audiology & neuro-otology.

[32]  Patricia A. Leake,et al.  Frequency Map for the Human Cochlear Spiral Ganglion: Implications for Cochlear Implants , 2007, Journal for the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[33]  J Thomas Roland,et al.  A Model for Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion and Force Evaluation: Results with a New Electrode Design and Insertion Technique , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[34]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Image-Guidance Enables New Methods for Customizing Cochlear Implant Stimulation Strategies , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[35]  Donald K Eddington,et al.  Analysis of Intracochlear New Bone and Fibrous Tissue Formation in Human Subjects with Cochlear Implants , 2007, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[36]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Factors Predicting Postoperative Sentence Scores in Postlinguistically Deaf Adult Cochlear Implant Patients , 1992, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.