A Robot Hand Testbed Designed for Enhancing Embodiment and Functional Neurorehabilitation of Body Schema in Subjects with Upper Limb Impairment or Loss

Many upper limb amputees experience an incessant, post-amputation “phantom limb pain” and report that their missing limbs feel paralyzed in an uncomfortable posture. One hypothesis is that efferent commands no longer generate expected afferent signals, such as proprioceptive feedback from changes in limb configuration, and that the mismatch of motor commands and visual feedback is interpreted as pain. Non-invasive therapeutic techniques for treating phantom limb pain, such as mirror visual feedback (MVF), rely on visualizations of postural changes. Advances in neural interfaces for artificial sensory feedback now make it possible to combine MVF with a high-tech “rubber hand” illusion, in which subjects develop a sense of embodiment with a fake hand when subjected to congruent visual and somatosensory feedback. We discuss clinical benefits that could arise from the confluence of known concepts such as MVF and the rubber hand illusion, and new technologies such as neural interfaces for sensory feedback and highly sensorized robot hand testbeds, such as the “BairClaw” presented here. Our multi-articulating, anthropomorphic robot testbed can be used to study proprioceptive and tactile sensory stimuli during physical finger–object interactions. Conceived for artificial grasp, manipulation, and haptic exploration, the BairClaw could also be used for future studies on the neurorehabilitation of somatosensory disorders due to upper limb impairment or loss. A remote actuation system enables the modular control of tendon-driven hands. The artificial proprioception system enables direct measurement of joint angles and tendon tensions while temperature, vibration, and skin deformation are provided by a multimodal tactile sensor. The provision of multimodal sensory feedback that is spatiotemporally consistent with commanded actions could lead to benefits such as reduced phantom limb pain, and increased prosthesis use due to improved functionality and reduced cognitive burden.

[1]  A. Kargov,et al.  Design and Evaluation of a Low-Cost Force Feedback System for Myoelectric Prosthetic Hands , 2006 .

[2]  F. V. Wright,et al.  Measurement of Functional Outcome With Individuals Who Use Upper Extremity Prosthetic Devices: Current and Future Directions , 2006 .

[3]  Sn Baker,et al.  Effects of Area 3a stimulation on muscle activity in the awake monkey , 2011 .

[4]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  An investigation of the transmission system of a tendon driven robot hand , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'94).

[5]  J. A. Stevens,et al.  Using motor imagery in the rehabilitation of hemiparesis. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  Design of Artificial Hands: A Review , 2014, The Human Hand as an Inspiration for Robot Hand Development.

[7]  William V. Massey,et al.  Control of Fingertip Forces in Young and Older Adults Pressing against Fixed Low- and High-Friction Surfaces , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  S. N. Naufel,et al.  Interactions Between Tactile and Proprioceptive Representations in Haptics , 2012, Journal of motor behavior.

[9]  R. Dickstein,et al.  Motor Imagery in Physical Therapist Practice , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[10]  Øyvind Stavdahl,et al.  Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures (ULPOM): A Working Group and Their Findings , 2009 .

[11]  Jacob L. Segil,et al.  Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: a review. , 2013, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  A. J. Harris,et al.  Cortical origin of pathological pain , 1999, The Lancet.

[13]  Keehoon Kim,et al.  Robotic touch shifts perception of embodiment to a prosthesis in targeted reinnervation amputees. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  M. Keith,et al.  A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[15]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  Vibrotactile Sensory Substitution Elicits Feeling of Ownership of an Alien Hand , 2012, PloS one.

[16]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  L. Miller,et al.  Electrical Stimulation of the Proprioceptive Cortex (Area 3a) Used to Instruct a Behaving Monkey , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[18]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[19]  G. Moseley,et al.  The rubber hand illusion increases histamine reactivity in the real arm , 2011, Current Biology.

[20]  Childress Ds,et al.  Design and evaluation of a prosthesis control system based on the concept of extended physiological proprioception. , 1984 .

[21]  Elaine Biddiss,et al.  Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[22]  S. Stralka,et al.  Graded motor imagery. , 2011, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[23]  Luca Citi,et al.  Restoring Natural Sensory Feedback in Real-Time Bidirectional Hand Prostheses , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[24]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems , 2005, Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS.

[25]  Thomas Elbert Pain from brain: Can we remodel neural circuitry that generates phantom limb pain and other forms of neuropathic pain? , 2012, Neuroscience Letters.

[26]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[27]  O. Witte,et al.  Sensory feedback prosthesis reduces phantom limb pain: Proof of a principle , 2012, Neuroscience Letters.

[28]  G. Moseley,et al.  Using graded motor imagery for complex regional pain syndrome in clinical practice: Failure to improve pain , 2012, European journal of pain.

[29]  C. Aldrich,et al.  Phantom limb pain. , 1982, American family physician.

[30]  Blair A. Lock,et al.  Redirection of cutaneous sensation from the hand to the chest skin of human amputees with targeted reinnervation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  J. Lackner Some proprioceptive influences on the perceptual representation of body shape and orientation. , 1988, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[33]  Andrew S. Whitford,et al.  Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding , 2008, Nature.

[34]  Jeremy A. Fishel,et al.  Evaluation of force, vibration and thermal tactile feedback in prosthetic limbs , 2014, 2014 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS).

[35]  Stephen C. Jacobsen,et al.  Antagonistic control of a tendon driven manipulator , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[36]  Tomonori Yamamoto,et al.  BioTac ^|^mdash;Biomimetic Multi-modal Tactile Sensor^|^mdash; , 2012 .

[37]  H. Coslett,et al.  Pain and the body schema: evidence for peripheral effects on mental representations of movement. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  J. Tastevin,et al.  En partant de l'expérience d'Aristote les déplacements artificiels des parties du corps ne sont pas suivis par le sentiment de ces parties ni par les sensations qu'on peut y produire. , 1937 .

[39]  Eric Chang,et al.  [D78] Tendon-driven testbed for haptic exploration and sensory event-driven grasp and manipulation , 2014, 2014 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS).

[40]  Courtney Medynski,et al.  Bebionic Prosthetic Design , 2011 .

[41]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[42]  Talicia Tarver,et al.  HEART DISEASE AND STROKE STATISTICS–2014 UPDATE: A REPORT FROM THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION , 2014 .

[43]  S. Tillery,et al.  Haptic Interaction of Touch and Proprioception: Implications for Neuroprosthetics , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[44]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  The perception of phantom limbs , 1998 .

[45]  Beth D Darnall,et al.  Self-delivered home-based mirror therapy for lower limb phantom pain. , 2009, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[46]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2014, Circulation.

[47]  R.F. Weir,et al.  The Optimal Controller Delay for Myoelectric Prostheses , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[48]  C. Spence,et al.  Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Joel Stein,et al.  Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2014, Circulation.

[50]  M. Choti,et al.  Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Early- and Late-Stage Human Malignancies , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[51]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper-Limb Prosthetics: Critical Factors in Device Abandonment , 2007, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[52]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror neuron system. , 2009, Archives of neurology.

[53]  T Walley Williams,et al.  Progress on stabilizing and controlling powered upper-limb prostheses. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[54]  G. Moseley,et al.  Graded motor imagery for pathologic pain , 2006, Neurology.

[55]  W.J. Tompkins,et al.  Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[56]  G de Groot,et al.  The strength of the hand. , 1970, Bulletin of prosthetics research.

[57]  D. Childress,et al.  Design and evaluation of a prosthesis control system based on the concept of extended physiological proprioception. , 1984, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[58]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation , 1994 .

[59]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[60]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[61]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso: a retrospective , 2011 .