Accuracy of MR imaging for revealing residual breast cancer in patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE Our study investigated the usefulness of contrast-enhanced MR imaging for accurately measuring the size of residual tumor after patients have undergone neoadjuvant (pre-operative) chemotherapy. The imaging analysis method was optimized for identifying residual disease in the treated breast. Tumor sizes measured on the MR images and at the clinical examination were compared with the size of residual disease measured at pathology after surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Before undergoing surgery, 52 patients were imaged before and after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For each patient, specific malignancy criteria were applied to MR images before chemotherapy to identify the location of tumor, and residual disease was then identified as any remaining enhancement in the same area on the MR images after chemotherapy. Residual tumor size was measured using both the MR technique and the clinical examination findings, and the degree of measurement error for each method was assessed in comparison with the pathologic findings. RESULTS The correlation with pathology was an r value of 0.89 for MR measurements compared with an r value of 0.60 for clinical measurements. In addition, MR imaging revealed all cases of residual disease, whereas clinical assessment resulted in five false-negative interpretations in the 52 treated lesions. CONCLUSION The high correlation between measurements of residual disease obtained on MR images and those obtained at pathology validates the sensitivity of MR imaging of the breast after chemotherapy.

[1]  L. Esserman,et al.  Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  H Zeitler,et al.  MRI of breast cancer: influence of chemotherapy on sensitivity. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  T K Foo,et al.  Inversion in the steady state: contrast optimization and reduced imaging time with fast three-dimensional inversion-recovery-prepared GRE pulse sequences. , 1994, Radiology.

[4]  M. Dewhirst,et al.  Accuracy of MRI in the detection of residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  N M Hylton,et al.  Semi-automated analysis for MRI of breast tumors. , 1999, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[6]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[7]  G J Metzger,et al.  MRI vs. histologic measurement of breast cancer following chemotherapy: Comparison with x‐ray mammography and palpation , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  S. Wurdinger,et al.  Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography , 2000, Breast Cancer Research.

[9]  R. Gilles,et al.  Locally advanced breast cancer: contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging of response to preoperative chemotherapy. , 1994, Radiology.

[10]  S Yoshida,et al.  Changes in the findings of dynamic MRI by preoperative CAF chemotherapy for patients with breast cancer of stage II and III: pathologic correlation. , 1999, Oncology reports.

[11]  S E Harms,et al.  Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic response of locally advanced breast cancer by magnetic resonance imaging , 1996, Cancer.