Translatability of in vitro potency to clinical efficacious exposure: A retrospective analysis of FDA‐approved targeted small molecule oncology drugs

In vitro potency is one of the important parameters representing efficacy potential of drugs and commonly used as benchmark of efficacious exposure at early clinical development. There are limited numbers of studies which systematically investigate on how predictive in vitro potency is to estimate therapeutic drug exposure, especially those focusing on targeted anticancer agents despite the recent increase in approvals. This study aims to fill in such knowledge gaps. A total of 87 small molecule targeted drugs approved for oncology indication between 2001 and 2020 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were identified; relevant preclinical and clinical data were extracted from the public domain. Relationships between the in vitro potency and the therapeutic dose or exposure (unbound average drug concentration [Cu,av ] as the primary exposure metrics) were assessed by descriptive analyses. The Spearman's rank correlation test showed slightly better correlation of the Cu,av (ρ = 0.232, p = 0.041) rather than the daily dose (ρ = 0.186, p = 0.096) with the in vitro potency. Better correlation was observed for the drugs for hematologic malignancies compared with those for solid tumors (root mean square error: 140 [n = 28] versus 297 [n = 59]). The present study shows that in vitro potency is predictive to estimate the therapeutic drug exposure to some extent, whereas the general trend of overexposure was observed. The results suggested that in vitro potency alone is not sufficient and robust enough to estimate the clinically efficacious exposure of molecularly targeted small molecule oncology drugs. The totality of data, including both nonclinical and clinical, needs to be considered for dose optimization.

[1]  L. Zhong,et al.  Small molecules in targeted cancer therapy: advances, challenges, and future perspectives , 2021, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.

[2]  S. Hjorth,et al.  Does In Vitro Potency Predict Clinically Efficacious Concentrations? , 2020, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[3]  Xingrong Liu,et al.  Drug Concentration Asymmetry in Tissues and Plasma for Small Molecule–Related Therapeutic Modalities , 2019, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[4]  F. Pea Intracellular Pharmacokinetics of Antibacterials and Their Clinical Implications , 2018, Clinical Pharmacokinetics.

[5]  P. Artursson,et al.  Intracellular drug bioavailability: a new predictor of system dependent drug disposition , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Dan Lu,et al.  A survey of new oncology drug approvals in the USA from 2010 to 2015: a focus on optimal dose and related postmarketing activities , 2016, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[7]  R. Schilsky,et al.  Optimizing Dosing of Oncology Drugs , 2014, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[8]  J. Verweij,et al.  Determining the optimal dose in the development of anticancer agents , 2014, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Liang-Shang Gan,et al.  Plasma protein binding: from discovery to development. , 2013, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[10]  R Scott Obach,et al.  Pharmacologically Active Drug Metabolites: Impact on Drug Discovery and Pharmacotherapy , 2013, Pharmacological Reviews.

[11]  John P. Overington,et al.  Probing the links between in vitro potency, ADMET and physicochemical parameters , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[12]  Edward H. Kerns,et al.  The effect of plasma protein binding on in vivo efficacy: misconceptions in drug discovery , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[13]  Stina Syvänen,et al.  On The Rate and Extent of Drug Delivery to the Brain , 2007, Pharmaceutical Research.

[14]  M. Relling,et al.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics of Anticancer Drugs , 1989, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[15]  W. Hryniuk,et al.  Applications of dose intensity to problems in chemotherapy of breast and colorectal cancer. , 1987, Seminars in oncology.