The applicability of non-local LCI data for LCA

This study evaluated how applicable European Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) data are to assessing the environmental impacts of the life cycle of Brazilian triple superphosphate (TSP). The LCI data used for the comparison were local Brazilian LCI data, European LCI data in its original version from the ecoinvent database and a modified version of the European LCI data, which had been adapted to better account for the Brazilian situation. We compared the three established datasets at the level of the inventory as well as for their environmental impacts, i.e. at the level of Life Cycle Environmental Assessment (LCIA). The analysis showed that the European LCIs (both the original and the modified ones) considered a broader spectrum of background processes and environmental flows (inputs and outputs). Nevertheless, TSP production had in all three cases similar values for the consumption of the main raw materials. The LCIA results obtained for the datasets showed important differences as well. Therefore we concluded that the European data in general lead to much higher environmental impacts than the Brazilian data. The differences between the LCIA results obtained with the Brazilian and the European data can be basically explained by the methodological differences underlying the data. The small differences at the LCI level for selected inputs and outputs between the Brazilian and the European LCIs from ecoinvent indicate that the latter can be regarded as applicable for characterizing the Brazilian TSP.

[1]  D. Pennington,et al.  Life Cycle Impact Assessment Workshop Summary Midpoints versus Endpoints: The Sacrifices and Benefits , 2000 .

[2]  Timothy J. Skone.  www.LCaccess—global directory of lci resources , 2001 .

[3]  Andreas Ciroth,et al.  Geographical and technological differences in life cycle inventories shown by the use of process models for waste incinerators part I. technological and geographical differences , 2002 .

[4]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  The ecoinvent Database: Overview and Methodological Framework (7 pp) , 2005 .

[5]  Semyon G. Rabinovich,et al.  Measurement Errors and Uncertainties , 2000 .

[6]  Economics. Production,et al.  Evaluation of environmental impacts in life cycle assessment , 2003 .

[7]  Mary Ann Curran.  Report on Activity of Task Force 1: Data Registry - Global Life Cycle Inventory Data Resources , 2006 .

[8]  Eric Johnson.  Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment Operational Guide to the ISO Standards , 2003 .

[9]  Luiz Alexandre Kulay.  Uso da análise de ciclo de vida para a comparação do desempenho ambiental das rotas úmida e térmica de produção de fertilizantes fosfatados. , 2004 .

[10]  Roland Hischier,et al.  Capacity building for a national life cycle inventory database-lessons learned in the real world: case study of a swiss-brazillian capacity building project , 2007 .

[11]  Andreas Ciroth,et al.  Geographical and technological differences in Life Cycle Inventories shown by the use of process models for waste incinerators , 2002 .

[12]  Guilherme de Paula Galdiano.  Inventário do ciclo de vida do papel offset produzido no Brasil. , 2006 .

[13]  Eloísa E. C. Garcia,et al.  Life cycle inventory for electric energy system in Brazil , 2003 .

[14]  Rainer Zah,et al.  Using non-local databases for the environmental assessment of industrial activities: The case of Latin America , 2010 .

[15]  S. Ellison,et al.  Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement , 2000 .

[16]  Luiz Kulay,et al.  Environmental performance comparison of wet and thermal routes for phosphate fertilizer production using LCA – A Brazilian experience , 2005 .

[17]  Remi B. Coulon,et al.  Data quality and uncertainty in LCI , 1997 .

[18]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards , 2002 .

[19]  B. P. Weidema,et al.  Agricultural data for life cycle assessments , 2000 .

[20]  Patrick Hofstetter,et al.  Midpoints versus endpoints: The sacrifices and benefits , 2000 .

[21]  Bas de Leeuw.  Life Cycle Management in Developing Countries: State of the Art and Outlook , 2006 .

[22]  M. Goedkoop,et al.  The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[23]  Andreas Ciroth,et al.  Uncertainty calculation in life cycle assessments , 2004 .

[24]  Niels Jungbluth,et al.  Guidelines for consistent reporting of exchanges/to nature within life cycle inventories (LCI) , 2001 .

[25]  Mary Ann Curran,et al.  LCAccess – Global Directory of LCI resources , 2005 .

[26]  Bo Weidema.  Environmental Project No . 862 2003 Miljøprojekt Reducing Uncertainty in LCI Developing a Data Collection Strategy , 2003 .

[27]  Nydia Suppen,et al.  Environmental management and life cycle approaches in the Mexican mining industry , 2006 .

[28]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  The ecoinvent database system: a comprehensive web-based LCA database , 2005 .

[29]  S. Ryding.  ISO 14042 Environmental management • Life cycle assessment • life cycle impact assessment , 1999 .

[30]  Anna Lúcia Mourad,et al.  Environmental Profile of Brazilian Green Coffee (6 pp) , 2006 .

[31]  Alan C. Brent,et al.  Status of life cycle assessment and engineering research in South Africa , 2002 .

[32]  R. Frischknecht,et al.  Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods. ecoinvent report No. 3, v2.2 , 2010 .

[33]  Anna Lúcia Mourad,et al.  Environmental Profile of Brazilian Green Coffee , 2022 .

[34]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Survey of approaches to improve reliability in lca , 2002 .