Temporal aspects of stereoscopic slant estimation: an evaluation and extension of Howard and Kaneko's theory

We investigated temporal aspects of stereoscopically perceived slant produced by the following transformations: horizontal scale, horizontal shear, vertical scale, vertical shear, divergence and rotation, between the half-images of a stereogram. Six subjects viewed large field stimuli (70 degrees diameter) both in the presence and in the absence of a visual reference. The presentation duration was: 0.1, 0.4, 1.6, 6.4 or 25.6 s. Without reference we found the following: rotation and divergence evoked considerable perceived slant in a number of subjects. This finding violates the recently published results of Howard and Kaneko. Slant evoked by vertical scale and shear was similar to slant evoked by horizontal scale and shear but was generally less. With reference we found the following: vertical scale and vertical shear did not evoke slant. Slant due to rotation and divergence was similar to slant due to horizontal scale and shear but was generally less. According to the theory of Howard and Kaneko, perceived slant depends on the difference between horizontal and vertical scale and shear disparities. We made their theory more explicit by translating their proposals into linear mathematical expressions that contain weighting factors that allow for both slant evoked by rotation or divergence, subject-dependent underestimation of slant and other related phenomena reported in the literature. Our data for all stimulus durations and for all subjects is explained by this 'unequal-weighting' extension of Howard and Kaneko's theory.

[1]  B Gillam,et al.  Postfusional latency in stereoscopic slant perception and the primitives of stereopsis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  I. Howard,et al.  Spatial Properties of Shear Disparity Processing , 1997, Vision Research.

[3]  G. J. Mitchison,et al.  Vision: Viewing geometry and gradients of horizontal disparity , 1991 .

[4]  I. Howard,et al.  Relative shear disparities and the perception of surface inclination , 1994, Vision Research.

[5]  B Gillam,et al.  The role of vertical disparity in the scaling of stereoscopic depth perception: An empirical and theoretical study , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  B Gillam,et al.  Orientation Disparity, Deformation, and Stereoscopic Slant Perception , 1991, Perception.

[7]  B Gillam,et al.  Evidence for disparity change as the primary stimulus for stereoscopic processing , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  K. N. Ogle.  Researches in binocular vision. , 1950 .

[9]  Barbara Gillam,et al.  Cue Conflict and Stereoscopic Surface Slant about Horizontal and Vertical Axes , 1994, Perception.

[10]  C. Erkelens,et al.  Stability of Binocular Depth Perception with Moving Head and Eyes , 1996, Vision Research.

[11]  J. E. W. Mayhew,et al.  Vertical disparity pooling and the induced effect , 1984, Nature.

[12]  Casper J. Erkelens,et al.  Temporal aspects of binocular slant perception , 1996, Vision Research.

[13]  I. Howard,et al.  Relative Size Disparities and the Perception of Surface Slant , 1996, Vision Research.

[14]  C. Erkelens,et al.  Binocular Perception of Slant about Oblique Axes Relative to a Visual Frame of Reference , 1995, Perception.

[15]  B. Gillam,et al.  The induced effect, vertical disparity, and stereoscopic theory , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Brian J. Rogers,et al.  The Perception and Representation of Depth and Slant in Stereoscopic Surfaces , 1992 .

[17]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Monocular aniseikonia: a motion parallax analogue of the disparity-induced effect , 1986, Nature.