The effect of uterine contractions on intrapartum fetal heart rate analyzed by a computerized system.

OBJECTIVE Our goal was to assess the effect of uterine activity on fetal heart rate indexes during the active phase of labor with a computerized fetal heart rate monitoring system. STUDY DESIGN Twenty-six healthy women were studied in active labor without analgesia. Fetal heart rate was analyzed by a computerized system (Sonicaid, System 8000), providing a numeric analysis of the fetal heart rate indexes. Montevideo and Alexandria units were used for quantitative assessment of contractions. RESULTS A significant correlation was found between Montevideo units and short-term variation (r = -0.62, p < 0.001), episodes of high (r = -0.48, p < 0.01) and low (r = 0.58, p < 0.01) fetal heart rate variation, and frequency of large accelerations (r = -0.49, p < 0.01). A significant correlation was also found between Alexandria units and short-term variation (r = -0.645, p < 0.001), episodes of high fetal heart rate variation (r = -0.58, p < 0.01), and frequency of large accelerations (r = -0.49, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS In active labor fetal heart rate variability is significantly affected by the intensity and duration of contractions.

[1]  H P van Geijn,et al.  Behavioral states in the human fetus during labor. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  G S Dawes,et al.  Computerized Fetal Heart Rate Analysis in Labor , 1991, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  H. Wallenburg,et al.  Interobserver and intraobserver variation in the assessment of antepartum cardiotocograms. , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  G. Dawes,et al.  Computerized analysis of episodic changes in fetal heart rate variation in early labor. , 1991, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  G S Dawes,et al.  Criteria for the design of fetal heart rate analysis systems. , 1990, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[6]  C. Wood.  PHYSIOLOGY OF UTERINE CONTRACTIONS * , 1964, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Commonwealth.

[7]  A. Samueloff,et al.  Is fetal heart rate variability a good predictor of fetal outcome? , 1994, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[8]  R. Caldeyro-barcia,et al.  Physiology Of The Uterine Contraction , 1960 .

[9]  K J Dalton,et al.  Diurnal, respiratory, and other rhythms of fetal heart rate in lambs. , 1977, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  C. Martin,et al.  Effect of acute hypoxemia and respiratory acidosis on the fetal heart rate in monkeys. , 1981, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  P. Johnson,et al.  Fetal heart rate variability changes and fetal behavioural cycles during labour. , 1986, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[12]  G S Dawes,et al.  Baseline in human fetal heart‐rate records , 1982, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[13]  P E Shrout,et al.  Reliability and reproducibility of nonstress test readings. , 1988, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  E H Hon,et al.  Clinical fetal monitoring. VII. The evaluation and significance of intrapartum baseline FHR variability. , 1975, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  M Y Divon,et al.  Increased beat-to-beat variability during uterine contractions: a common association in uncomplicated labor. , 1984, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  S. El-sahwi,et al.  A new unit for evaluation of uterine activity. , 1967, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  R. Gagnon,et al.  A comparison between visual and computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  A. Vintzileos,et al.  Comparison of the Effects of Meperidine and Nalbuphine on Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Tracings , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  P. Nielsen,et al.  Intra‐ and inter‐observer variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms , 1987 .