Joint Genetic Inhibition of PCSK9 and CETP and the Association With Coronary Artery Disease: A Factorial Mendelian Randomization Study.

Importance Cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibition (CETP) has been shown to increase levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and reduce levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Current LDL-C target attainment is low, and novel phase 3 trials are underway to investigate whether CETP inhibitors result in reduction of cardiovascular disease risk in high-risk patients who may be treated with PCSK9-inhibiting agents. Objective To explore the associations of combined reduction of CETP and PCSK9 concentrations with risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) and other clinical and safety outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants Two-sample 2 × 2 factorial Mendelian randomization study in a general population sample that includes data for UK Biobank participants of European ancestry. Exposures Separate genetic scores were constructed for CETP and PCSK9 plasma protein concentrations, which were combined to determine the associations of combined genetically reduced CETP and PCSK9 concentrations with disease. Main Outcomes and Measures Blood lipid and lipoprotein concentrations, blood pressure, CAD, age-related macular degeneration, type 2 diabetes, any stroke and ischemic stroke, Alzheimer disease, vascular dementia, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, asthma, and multiple sclerosis. Results Data for 425 354 UKB participants were included; the median (IQR) age was 59 years (51-64), and 229 399 (53.9%) were female. The associations of lower CETP and lower PCSK9 concentrations with CAD are similar when scaled per 10-mg/dL reduction in LDL-C concentrations (CETP: odds ratio [OR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.81; PCSK9: OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.79). Combined exposure to lower CETP and PCSK9 concentrations was associated with an additive magnitude with lipids and all outcomes, and we did not observe any nonadditive interactions, most notably for LDL-C (CETP: effect size, -1.11 mg/dL; 95% CI, -1.40 to -0.82; PCSK9: effect size, -2.13 mg/dL; 95% CI, -2.43 to -1.84; combined: effect size, -3.47 mg/dL; 95% CI, -3.76 to -3.18; P = .34 for interaction) and CAD (CETP: OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.00; PCSK9: OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91 to 0.97; combined: OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.93; P = .83 for interaction). In addition, when corrected for multiple testing, lower CETP concentrations were associated with increased age-related macular degeneration (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.19). Conclusions and Relevance Our results suggest that joint inhibition of CETP and PCSK9 has additive effects on lipid traits and disease risk, including a lower risk of CAD. Further research may explore whether a combination of CETP- and PCSK9-related therapeutics can benefit high-risk patients who are unable to reach treatment targets with existing options.

[1]  B. Nordestgaard,et al.  Long-term Benefits and Harms Associated With Genetic Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Deficiency in the General Population. , 2021, JAMA cardiology.

[2]  A. Hingorani,et al.  Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) as a drug target for cardiovascular disease , 2021, Nature Communications.

[3]  Sina A. Gharib,et al.  Large-scale cis- and trans-eQTL analyses identify thousands of genetic loci and polygenic scores that regulate blood gene expression , 2021, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Michael Miller,et al.  Advancing Beyond Failed High-density Lipoprotein Clinical Trials to Pharmacogenetic Studies of ADCY9 and Cholesterol Ester Transfer Protein Inhibition , 2021, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology.

[5]  B. Zafrir,et al.  PCSK9 inhibition in clinical practice: Treatment patterns and attainment of lipid goals in a large health maintenance organization. , 2020, Journal of clinical lipidology.

[6]  John P. Overington,et al.  PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. , 2020, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

[7]  A. Parkhomenko,et al.  EU-Wide Cross-Sectional Observational Study of Lipid-Modifying Therapy Use in Secondary and Primary Care: the DA VINCI study. , 2020, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[8]  E. Steinhagen-Thiessen,et al.  PCSK9 Inhibitors in a German Single-Center Clinical Practice: Real-World Treatment of Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk Over 68 Weeks , 2020, American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs.

[9]  B. Nordestgaard,et al.  Proportion of High-Risk/Very High-Risk Patients in Europe with Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Target According to European Guidelines: A Systematic Review , 2020, Advances in Therapy.

[10]  Lawrence A Leiter,et al.  Dalcetrapib Reduces Risk of New-Onset Diabetes in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease , 2020, Diabetes Care.

[11]  J. S. St. John,et al.  Effect of CETP inhibition with evacetrapib in patients with diabetes mellitus enrolled in the ACCELERATE trial , 2020, BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care.

[12]  G. Hindricks,et al.  2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: Lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. , 2019, Atherosclerosis.

[13]  Gerta Rücker,et al.  How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial , 2019, Evidence-Based Mental Health.

[14]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Association of Genetic Variants Related to Combined Exposure to Lower Low-Density Lipoproteins and Lower Systolic Blood Pressure With Lifetime Risk of Cardiovascular Disease. , 2019, JAMA.

[15]  M. Holmes,et al.  What is ‘LDL cholesterol’? , 2019, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[16]  Christopher N. Foley,et al.  Factorial Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants to assess interactions , 2019, bioRxiv.

[17]  Christine Binquet,et al.  Increased High-Density Lipoprotein Levels Associated with Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Evidence from the EYE-RISK and European Eye Epidemiology Consortia. , 2018, Ophthalmology.

[18]  R. Noordam,et al.  Mendelian randomization reveals unexpected effects of CETP on the lipoprotein profile , 2018, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[19]  P. Donnelly,et al.  The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data , 2018, Nature.

[20]  G. Davey Smith,et al.  Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians , 2018, British Medical Journal.

[21]  M. Scholz,et al.  Genetic Regulation of PCSK9 (Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9) Plasma Levels and Its Impact on Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Phenotypes , 2018, Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine.

[22]  J. Jukema,et al.  Mendelian randomization analysis of cholesteryl ester transfer protein and subclinical atherosclerosis: A population-based study. , 2017, Journal of clinical lipidology.

[23]  A. Sposito,et al.  Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) Inhibitors and Incident Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With Over 96,000 Patient-Years , 2017, Diabetes Care.

[24]  F. Chen,et al.  Effects of Anacetrapib in Patients With Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease , 2018 .

[25]  Brian A Ference,et al.  Association of Genetic Variants Related to CETP Inhibitors and Statins With Lipoprotein Levels and Cardiovascular Risk , 2017, JAMA.

[26]  E. Zeggini,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of health-related biomarkers in the UK Household Longitudinal Study reveals novel associations , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[27]  Lale Tokgözoğlu,et al.  Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel , 2017, European heart journal.

[28]  Hynek Pikhart,et al.  PCSK9 genetic variants and risk of type 2 diabetes: a mendelian randomisation study , 2017, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[29]  Szilard Voros,et al.  Variation in PCSK9 and HMGCR and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  A. Hingorani,et al.  Comparison of variance estimators for meta-analysis of instrumental variable estimates , 2016, International journal of epidemiology.

[31]  M. Pirinen,et al.  Genome-wide study for circulating metabolites identifies 62 loci and reveals novel systemic effects of LPA , 2016, Nature Communications.

[32]  J. Danesh,et al.  A comprehensive 1000 Genomes-based genome-wide association meta-analysis of coronary artery disease , 2016 .

[33]  A. Gotto,et al.  Measurement of LDL-C after treatment with the CETP inhibitor anacetrapib[S] , 2013, Journal of Lipid Research.

[34]  Jennifer G. Robinson,et al.  The interleukin-6 receptor as a target for prevention of coronary heart disease: a mendelian randomisation analysis , 2012, The Lancet.

[35]  R. Collins,et al.  Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials , 2010, The Lancet.

[36]  Yasuo Ohashi,et al.  Statins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin trials , 2010, The Lancet.

[37]  A. Kontush,et al.  Cholesteryl ester transfer protein: at the heart of the action of lipid-modulating therapy with statins, fibrates, niacin, and cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors , 2009, European heart journal.

[38]  George Davey Smith,et al.  Mendelian randomization: Using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[39]  M. Caulfield,et al.  Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  D G Altman,et al.  Statistics notes: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence , 1995 .