Choice of Aircraft Size - Explanations and Implications

To keep load factors high while offering high frequency service, airlines tend to reduce the size of the aircraft they use. At many of the world’s largest airports there are fewer than 100 passengers per air transport movement, although congestion and delays are growing. Furthermore, demand for air transport is predicted to continue growing but aircraft size is not. This paper aims to investigate and explain this phenomenon, the choice of relatively small aircraft. It seems that this choice is associated mainly with the benefits of high frequency service, the competitive environment in which airlines operate and the way airport capacity is allocated and priced. Regression analysis of over 500 routes in the US, Europe and Asia provides empirical evidence that the choice of aircraft size is mainly influenced by route characteristics (e.g. distance, level of demand and level of competition) and almost not at all by airport characteristics (e.g. number of runways and whether the airport is a hub or slot coordinated). We discuss the implications of this choice of aircraft size and suggest that some market imperfections exist in the airline industry leading airlines to offer excessive frequency on some routes and too low frequency on others.

[1]  Moshe Givoni,et al.  Aircraft and high speed train substitution: the case for airline and railway integration. , 2005 .

[2]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  Temporal Competition in Transport: An Equilibrium Approach to Departure Times in Public Transport , 1997 .

[3]  Jan K. Brueckner,et al.  A MODEL OF SCHEDULING IN AIRLINE NETWORKS: HOW A HUB-AND-SPOKE SYSTEM AFFECTS FLIGHT FREQUENCY, FARES AND WELFARE , 2001 .

[4]  S. Salop Monopolistic competition with outside goods , 1979 .

[5]  Moshe Givoni,et al.  Environmental Benefits from Mode Substitution: Comparison of the Environmental Impact from Aircraft and High-Speed Train Operations , 2007 .

[6]  Jan K. Brueckner,et al.  Network Structure and Airline Scheduling , 2004 .

[7]  David Pearce,et al.  SETTING ENVIRONMENTAL TAXES FOR AIRCRAFT: A CASE STUDY OF THE UK , 2000 .

[8]  Kenneth Button,et al.  Recovering Costs by Increasing Market Share An Empirical Critique of the S-Curve , 2005 .

[9]  Ian Savage,et al.  Deploying regional jets to add new spokes to a hub , 2004 .

[10]  R. S. Birch,et al.  Impact on Aircraft , 2003 .

[11]  Yuliang Yao,et al.  Airport Barriers to Entry in the US , 2000 .

[12]  Kenneth Button,et al.  An Assessment of the Capacity and Congestion levels at European Airports , 1999 .

[13]  Mark Hansen,et al.  Impact of aircraft size and seat availability on airlines' demand and market share in duopoly markets , 2005 .

[14]  M. Hansen,et al.  Prospects for Increasing Average Aircraft Size at Congested Airports , 2001 .

[15]  Mark Hansen,et al.  COST ECONOMICS OF AIRCRAFT SIZE , 2003 .

[16]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  Deregulation in European Aviation and the Evolution of Hub-and-Spoke Networks: Impacts on the Environment , 2005 .

[17]  Nicole Adler,et al.  Aircraft trip cost parameters: A function of stage length and seat capacity , 2006 .

[18]  MengChu Zhou,et al.  REGIONAL JET SERVICES: SUPPLY AND DEMAND , 2001 .

[19]  Ian Savage,et al.  Departure Delays, the Pricing of Congestion, and Expansion Proposals at Chicago O’Hare Airport , 2006 .

[20]  J. Y. Schipper Market Structure and Environmental Costs in Aviation , 1999 .

[21]  Frode Steen,et al.  Hotelling in the air? Flight departures in Norway , 2005 .