Molecular simulation of pH-dependent diffusion, loading, and release of doxorubicin in graphene and graphene oxide drug delivery systems.

In this study, the adsorption of doxorubicin (DOX), an anticancer drug, on pristine graphene (PG) and graphene oxide (GO) nanocarriers with different surface oxygen densities and in an aqueous environment with varying pH levels was investigated using molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. The drug loading and release on the GO nanocarrier was also simulated using pH as the controller mechanism. Overall, the DOX/nanocarrier interactions become stronger as the graphene surface oxygen density increases. Although pH has a negligible effect on the single-molecule drug adsorption on the GO surfaces under acidic and neutral conditions, significantly stronger DOX/nanocarrier interactions occur for the GO nanosheet with a lower surface oxygen density (GO-16, with an O/C ratio of 1 : 6) at basic pH levels. Moreover, the DOX/nanocarrier interactions are greatly weakened in the GO nanosheet with higher surface oxygen density (GO-13, with an O/C ratio of 1 : 3) under basic conditions. These observations are partly attributed to a more favorable geometry of the DOX molecule on the GO-16 surface as opposed to a loosely attached DOX molecule on the edges of the GO-13 nanosheet. When comparing the adsorption kinetics and transport properties of the DOX molecule in different GO systems, the drug diffusion coefficient increases with decreasing pH value (going from basic to neutral to acidic) due to the reduced total water-nanocarrier interactions. The latter observation is an indication of the more facilitated transport of the DOX molecule in an aqueous medium towards the nanocarrier surface at lower pH levels. Finally, we have confirmed the loading and release of the DOX molecules on the GO nanocarrier under neutral (pH = 7) and acidic (pH = 5) conditions, respectively. The former signifies the blood pH level, whereas the latter is reminiscent of the pH of a tumorous cell. The computational results presented in this work reveal the underlying mechanisms of DOX loading and release on PG and GO surfaces, which may be used to design better graphene-based nanocarriers for the DOX delivery and targeting applications.

[1]  P. Choong,et al.  A chitosan-dipotassium orthophosphate hydrogel for the delivery of Doxorubicin in the treatment of osteosarcoma. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[2]  Ben J Boyd,et al.  A comparison of changes to doxorubicin pharmacokinetics, antitumor activity, and toxicity mediated by PEGylated dendrimer and PEGylated liposome drug delivery systems. , 2012, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[3]  Yao Sun,et al.  Dissipative Particle Dynamics Study on Aggregation of MPEG-PAE-PLA Block Polymer Micelles Loading Doxorubicine , 2012 .

[4]  Vivek B Shenoy,et al.  Structural evolution during the reduction of chemically derived graphene oxide. , 2010, Nature chemistry.

[5]  C. Marichal,et al.  Interactions of oxytetracycline with a smectite clay: a spectroscopic study with molecular simulations. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Xuesi Chen,et al.  Co-delivery of doxorubicin and paclitaxel by PEG-polypeptide nanovehicle for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[7]  J. Prados,et al.  Enhanced antitumoral activity of doxorubicin against lung cancer cells using biodegradable poly(butylcyanoacrylate) nanoparticles , 2015, Drug design, development and therapy.

[8]  S. Gwaltney,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of vinyl ester resin monomer interactions with a pristine vapor-grown carbon nanofiber and their implications for composite interphase formation , 2011 .

[9]  Xing Ma,et al.  A preloaded amorphous calcium carbonate/doxorubicin@silica nanoreactor for pH-responsive delivery of an anticancer drug. , 2015, Angewandte Chemie.

[10]  Zhiping Xu,et al.  Selective gas diffusion in graphene oxides membranes: a molecular dynamics simulations study. , 2015, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[11]  Wely B. Floriano,et al.  Favorable adsorption of capped amino acids on graphene substrate driven by desolvation effect. , 2013, The Journal of chemical physics.

[12]  George C Schatz,et al.  Atomistic simulation and measurement of pH dependent cancer therapeutic interactions with nanodiamond carrier. , 2011, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[13]  Qi Wang,et al.  Molecular dynamics study on the interaction between doxorubicin and hydrophobically modified chitosan oligosaccharide , 2014 .

[14]  F. Martin,et al.  Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: proof of principle using preclinical animal models and pharmacokinetic studies. , 2004, Seminars in oncology.

[15]  Michael S Strano,et al.  Understanding the stabilization of liquid-phase-exfoliated graphene in polar solvents: molecular dynamics simulations and kinetic theory of colloid aggregation. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[16]  Shuichi Nosé,et al.  Constant Temperature Molecular Dynamics Methods , 1991 .

[17]  I. Larson,et al.  Chitosan-dibasic orthophosphate hydrogel: a potential drug delivery system. , 2009, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[18]  Yi Yan Yang,et al.  Co-delivery of thioridazine and doxorubicin using polymeric micelles for targeting both cancer cells and cancer stem cells. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[19]  Marco Orecchioni,et al.  Graphene as Cancer Theranostic Tool: Progress and Future Challenges , 2015, Theranostics.

[20]  P. Liu,et al.  Biocompatible graphene oxide nanoparticle-based drug delivery platform for tumor microenvironment-responsive triggered release of doxorubicin. , 2014, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[21]  P. Das,et al.  pH-Responsive single walled carbon nanotube dispersion for target specific release of doxorubicin to cancer cells. , 2014, Macromolecular bioscience.

[22]  Yongsheng Chen,et al.  Superparamagnetic graphene oxide–Fe3O4nanoparticles hybrid for controlled targeted drug carriers , 2009 .

[23]  H. Sun,et al.  COMPASS: An ab Initio Force-Field Optimized for Condensed-Phase ApplicationsOverview with Details on Alkane and Benzene Compounds , 1998 .

[24]  Yongsheng Chen,et al.  High-Efficiency Loading and Controlled Release of Doxorubicin Hydrochloride on Graphene Oxide , 2008 .

[25]  Zhuang Liu,et al.  Supramolecular stacking of doxorubicin on carbon nanotubes for in vivo cancer therapy. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[26]  S. Chakraborty,et al.  Molecular mechanism of water permeation in a helium impermeable graphene and graphene oxide membrane. , 2015, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[27]  R. Berry,et al.  Simulations of peptide-graphene interactions in explicit water. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[28]  W. Goddard,et al.  Charge equilibration for molecular dynamics simulations , 1991 .

[29]  D. Losic,et al.  Graphene and graphene oxide as new nanocarriers for drug delivery applications. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[30]  Yaping Li,et al.  Co-delivery of doxorubicin and RNA using pH-sensitive poly (β-amino ester) nanoparticles for reversal of multidrug resistance of breast cancer. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[31]  Kazunori Kataoka,et al.  Preparation and biological characterization of polymeric micelle drug carriers with intracellular pH-triggered drug release property: tumor permeability, controlled subcellular drug distribution, and enhanced in vivo antitumor efficacy. , 2005, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[32]  Crispin R Dass,et al.  Doxorubicin: an update on anticancer molecular action, toxicity and novel drug delivery systems , 2013, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[33]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[34]  Denis J. Evans,et al.  The Nose–Hoover thermostat , 1985 .

[35]  R. Naik,et al.  Stability of peptide (P1 and P2) binding to a graphene sheet via an all-atom to all-residue coarse-grained approach , 2012 .

[36]  S. Gwaltney,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of oxidized vapor-grown carbon nanofiber surface interactions with vinyl ester resin monomers , 2012 .

[37]  Z. Gu,et al.  Dendrimer–doxorubicin conjugate as enzyme-sensitive and polymeric nanoscale drug delivery vehicle for ovarian cancer therapy , 2014 .

[38]  F. Sharif,et al.  Graphene-oxide stabilization in electrolyte solutions using hydroxyethyl cellulose for drug delivery application. , 2015, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[39]  Mattaparthi Venkata Satish Kumar,et al.  PAMAM dendrimer-drug interactions: effect of pH on the binding and release pattern. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[40]  Michael S Strano,et al.  Understanding the pH-dependent behavior of graphene oxide aqueous solutions: a comparative experimental and molecular dynamics simulation study. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[41]  E. Riedo,et al.  Room-temperature metastability of multilayer graphene oxide films. , 2012, Nature materials.

[42]  R. Ruoff,et al.  The chemistry of graphene oxide. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.

[43]  S. Gwaltney,et al.  Interfacial shear strength of cured vinyl ester resin-graphite nanoplatelet from molecular dynamics simulations , 2013 .

[44]  R. Mahato,et al.  Doxorubicin and lapatinib combination nanomedicine for treating resistant breast cancer. , 2014, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[45]  T. Young,et al.  Doxorubicin delivery by polyamidoamine dendrimer conjugation and photochemical internalization for cancer therapy. , 2007, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[46]  Shirui Mao,et al.  Smart pH-sensitive and temporal-controlled polymeric micelles for effective combination therapy of doxorubicin and disulfiram. , 2013, ACS nano.