Comparative Analysis of Networks of Phonologically Similar Words in English and Spanish

Previous network analyses of several languages revealed a unique set of structural characteristics. One of these characteristics—the presence of many smaller components (referred to as islands)—was further examined with a comparative analysis of the island constituents. The results showed that Spanish words in the islands tended to be phonologically and semantically similar to each other, but English words in the islands tended only to be phonologically similar to each other. The results of this analysis yielded hypotheses about language processing that can be tested with psycholinguistic experiments, and offer insight into cross-language differences in processing that have been previously observed.

[1]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  The Ontogeny of Scale-Free Syntax Networks: Phase Transitions in Early Language Acquisition , 2009, Adv. Complex Syst..

[2]  Gilberto Corso,et al.  The network of syllables in Portuguese , 2005 .

[3]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Virtual Round Table on ten leading questions for network research , 2004 .

[4]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Longitudinal Analysis of Early Semantic Networks , 2009, Psychological science.

[5]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[6]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .

[7]  Johannes C. Ziegler,et al.  Orthographic effects in spoken language: On-line activation or phonological restructuring? , 2009, Brain Research.

[8]  M. Vitevitch,et al.  Neighborhood density effects in spoken word recognition in Spanish , 2005, Journal of multilingual communication disorders.

[9]  M. Vitevitch,et al.  The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Reinhard Köhler,et al.  Patterns in syntactic dependency networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  Ramon Ferrer i Cancho,et al.  The small world of human language , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Laurie Bauer,et al.  A note regarding ‘On the power-law distribution of language family sizes’ , 2006, Journal of Linguistics.

[13]  Partha Dasgupta,et al.  Topology of the conceptual network of language. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  M. Vitevitch.  What can graph theory tell us about word learning and lexical retrieval? , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[16]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Emergent categories in the feature structure of early-learned nouns , 2009 .

[17]  H. Storkel,et al.  Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning. , 2006, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[18]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Scale-Free Networks in Phonological and Orthographic Wordform Lexicons , 2007 .

[19]  Gang Peng,et al.  The networks of syllables and characters in Chinese* , 2008, J. Quant. Linguistics.

[20]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  The Large-Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Categorical structure among shared features in networks of early-learned nouns , 2009, Cognition.

[22]  Jinyun Ke,et al.  Analysing Language Development from a Network Approach* , 2006, J. Quant. Linguistics.

[23]  Michael S Vitevitch,et al.  The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  M E J Newman.  Assortative mixing in networks. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[25]  Melissa K. Stamer,et al.  The curious case of competition in Spanish speech production , 2006, Language and cognitive processes.

[26]  H E Stanley,et al.  Classes of small-world networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Michael S. Vitevitch,et al.  The Structure of Phonological Networks across Multiple Languages , 2009, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[28]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.