On-line Mathematics Assessment: The Impact of Mode on Performance and Question Answering Strategies

The transition from paper-based to computer-based assessment raises a number of important issues about how mode might affect children’s performance and question answering strategies. In this project 104 eleven-year-olds were given two sets of matched mathematics questions, one set on-line and the other on paper. Facility values were analyzed to explore the impact of the mode on performance. Errors were coded and this allowed further investigation of the differences between questions in the different modes. The study also investigated children’s affective responses to working on computer, attempting to gain an insight into the effect of motivational factors. This was made possible by observing and interviewing a sub-sample of children. Findings suggested that although there were no statistically significant differences between overall performances on paper and computer, there were enough differences at the individual question-level to warrant further investigation. Close analysis of the data suggests that it is possible that the question type, the way it is asked, and the numbers involved, might interact with mode to affect students’ willingness to show working methods. The findings also suggest that certain types of questions in certain domains might have different impacts according to mode. The study concludes that there is scope for more research to probe further any links that may exist between children’s thinking, behavior and assessment mode in order to satisfy concerns about the relative reliability and validity of computer-based and paper-based testing.

[1]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[2]  Mary Pommerich,et al.  From Simulation to Application: Examinees React to Computerized Testing , 2000 .

[3]  Mark D. Reckase,et al.  TECHNICAL GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSING COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTS , 1984 .

[4]  Employment,et al.  The National Curriculum : handbook for primary teachers in England , 1999 .

[5]  Michael Russell,et al.  Computer-based Testing and Validity: a look back into the future , 2003 .

[6]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  THE EFFECT OF COMPUTER-BASED TESTS ON RACIAL/ETHNIC, GENDER, AND LANGUAGE GROUPS , 2000 .

[8]  R. Bennett Online Assessment and the Comparability of Score Meaning , 2003 .

[9]  Wendy Sutherland-Smith Weaving the literacy web : changes in reading from page to screen , 2002 .

[10]  Mary Pommerich,et al.  Developing Computerized Versions of Paper-and-Pencil Tests: Mode Effects for Passage-Based Tests , 2004 .

[11]  Jo Ann Lee,et al.  The Effects of Training on Computerized Aptitude Test Performance and Anxiety. , 1985 .

[12]  Helen Sian Ashton,et al.  Piloting Summative Web Assessment in Secondary Education , 2003 .

[13]  Larry F. Guthrie,et al.  Turned on to Language Arts: Computer Literacy in the Primary Grades. , 1995 .

[14]  Maria Lee,et al.  Can the Same Results be Obtained Using Computer-mediated Tests as for Paper-based Tests for National Curriculum Assessment? , 2000 .

[15]  S. J. French,et al.  Accent on teaching : experiments in general education , 1954 .

[16]  J. Schacter The Impact of Education Technology on Student Achievement: What the Most Current Research Has To Say. , 1999 .

[17]  Andrew J. Poggio,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of Score Results from Computerized and Paper & Pencil Mathematics Testing in a Large Scale State Assessment Program , 2005 .

[18]  M. Lepper Motivational Considerations in the Study of Instruction , 1988 .

[19]  Tony Fisher,et al.  ImpaCT2: the impact of information and communication technologies on pupil learning and attainment , 2002 .

[20]  Brent Bridgeman,et al.  Effects of Screen Size, Screen Resolution, and Display Rate on Computer-Based Test Performance , 2001 .

[21]  Mary Richardson,et al.  Challenging minds? Students' perceptions of computer-based World Class Tests of problem solving , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  T. Levin,et al.  Effect of Gender and Computer Experience on Attitudes toward Computers , 1989 .

[23]  D. Wiliam The half‐second delay: what follows? , 2006 .