Electromagnetic tracking in surgical and interventional environments: usability study

PurposeElectromagnetic (EM) tracking of instruments within a clinical setting is notorious for fluctuating measurement performance. Position location measurement uncertainty of an EM system was characterized in various environments, including control, clinical, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and CT scanner environments. Static and dynamic effects of CBCT and CT scanning on EM tracking were evaluated.Methods   Two guidance devices were designed to solely translate or rotate the sensor in a non-interfering fit to decouple pose-dependent tracking uncertainties. These devices were mounted on a base to allow consistent and repeatable tests when changing environments. Using this method, position and orientation measurement accuracies, precision, and 95 % confidence intervals were assessed.Results   The tracking performance varied significantly as a function of the environment—especially within the CBCT and CT scanners—and sensor pose. In fact, at a fixed sensor position in the clinical environment, the measurement error varied from 0.2 to 2.2 mm depending on sensor orientations. Improved accuracies were observed along the vertical axis of the field generator. Calibration of the measurements improved tracking performance in the CT environment by 50–85 %.Conclusion   EM tracking can provide effective assistance to surgeons or interventional radiologists during procedures performed in a clinical or CBCT environment. Applications in the CT scanner demand precalibration to provide acceptable performance.

[1]  M. Donat,et al.  Stability of miniature electromagnetic tracking systems. , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  J. Krücker,et al.  Electromagnetic tracking for thermal ablation and biopsy guidance: clinical evaluation of spatial accuracy. , 2007, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[3]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Needle deflection estimation: prostate brachytherapy phantom experiments , 2014, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[4]  A M Bull,et al.  Accuracy of an electromagnetic tracking device. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Franz Kainberger,et al.  Quantitative analysis of factors affecting intraoperative precision and stability of optoelectronic and electromagnetic tracking systems. , 2002, Medical physics.

[6]  Yuru Zhang,et al.  Improving the Positioning Accuracy of a Neurosurgical Robot System , 2007, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[7]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Improved Modelling of Tool Tracking Errors by Modelling Dependent Marker Errors , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Suzanne LaScalza,et al.  Effect of metal and sampling rate on accuracy of Flock of Birds electromagnetic tracking system. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Ziv Yaniv,et al.  Electromagnetic tracking in the clinical environment. , 2009, Medical physics.

[10]  Wolfgang Birkfellner,et al.  Evaluation of a miniature electromagnetic position tracker. , 2002, Medical physics.

[11]  Helmar Bergmann,et al.  Design and application of an assessment protocol for electromagnetic tracking systems. , 2005, Medical physics.

[12]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Electromagnetic Tracking for Image-Guided Abdominal Procedures: Overall System and Technical Issues , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[13]  Nikhil Kulkarni,et al.  Minimizing Electromagnetic Interference from Surgical Instruments on Electromagnetic Surgical Navigation , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  Charles D. Hansen,et al.  An improved calibration framework for electromagnetic tracking devices , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2001.

[15]  Thomas Langø,et al.  Accuracy of electromagnetic tracking with a prototype field generator in an interventional OR setting. , 2012, Medical physics.

[16]  G A Dumas,et al.  Calibration of position and angular data from a magnetic tracking device. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  A hardware and software protocol for the evaluation of electromagnetic tracker accuracy in the clinical environment: a multi-center study , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[18]  Georg Eggers,et al.  Accuracy assessment for navigated maxillo-facial surgery using an electromagnetic tracking device. , 2012, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[19]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Fusion of Electromagnetic Trackers to Improve Needle Deflection Estimation: Simulation Study , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  A M Franz,et al.  Standardized assessment of new electromagnetic field generators in an interventional radiology setting. , 2012, Medical physics.

[21]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Magneto-Optical Tracking of Flexible Laparoscopic Ultrasound: Model-Based Online Detection and Correction of Magnetic Tracking Errors , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  H Bergmann,et al.  Systematic distortions in magnetic position digitizers. , 1998, Medical physics.

[23]  Wolfgang Birkfellner,et al.  Electromagnetic tracking for US-guided interventions: standardized assessment of a new compact field generator , 2012, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[24]  Florian Kral,et al.  Comparison of optical and electromagnetic tracking for navigated lateral skull base surgery , 2013, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[25]  Richard A. Robb,et al.  A novel technique for analysis of accuracy of magnetic tracking systems used in image guided surgery , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[26]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Needle deflection estimation using fusion of electromagnetic trackers , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[27]  Volodymyr V. Kindratenko,et al.  A survey of electromagnetic position tracker calibration techniques , 2005, Virtual Reality.

[28]  D. Simon,et al.  Accuracy Requirements for Image-Guided Spinal Pedicle Screw Placement , 2001, Spine.

[29]  François Poulin,et al.  Interference during the use of an electromagnetic tracking system under OR conditions. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  R. Galloway,et al.  Volumetric characterization of the Aurora magnetic tracker system for image-guided transorbital endoscopic procedures , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.  Pitfalls of electromagnetic tracking in clinical routine using multiple or adjacent sensors , 2013, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[32]  Jochen Kruecker,et al.  Quantification of AC electromagnetic tracking system accuracy in a CT scanner environment , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[33]  K. S. Arun,et al.  Least-Squares Fitting of Two 3-D Point Sets , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[34]  Andrew D. Wiles,et al.  Accuracy assessment protocols for elektromagnetic tracking systems , 2003, CARS.

[35]  Selim G. Akl,et al.  ACCURACY OF ELECTROMAGNETIC TRACKING IN AN IMAGE-GUIDED SURGERY SUITE , 2013 .

[36]  Jochen Kruecker,et al.  Effects of sensor orientation on AC electromagnetic tracking system accuracy in a CT scanner environment , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.