Evaluating online conversation in an asynchronous learning environment: An application of Grice's cooperative principle

This study goes beyond student perceptions of online learning experiences, satisfaction, and attitudes, to examine the actual participation and dynamics that occur in online discussions and their relationship to student learning outcomes. A content analysis approach was used to investigate students' socio-cognitive processes in an online graduate-level English grammar class. Student postings were rated using a newly developed Gricean Cooperative Principle scoring rubric to assess student participation as determined by four maxims: Quantity, Quality, Relevance, and Manner. Results suggest that Quality is the most important criterion for predicting direct responses to a posting. Students with high average Quality scores also received higher final course grades than did their counterparts. In addition, students with high scores for Manner earned higher conference grades than did their counterparts.

[1]  Mike Levy,et al.  Theory and Design in a Multimedia CALL Project in Cross-Cultural Pragmatics , 1999 .

[2]  R. Penman,et al.  Reconstructing Communicating: Looking To A Future , 2000 .

[3]  Lev Vygotsky.  Mind in society , 1978 .

[4]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1997 .

[5]  A. Avramides.  Studies in the Way of Words , 1992 .

[6]  Karen Swan,et al.  Building Learning Communities in Online Courses: the importance of interaction , 2002 .

[7]  Georgia M. Green.  Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding , 1989 .

[8]  Courtney B. Cazden,et al.  Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Second Edition. , 2001 .

[9]  Charlotte N. Gunawardena,et al.  Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing , 1997 .

[10]  Denise E. Murray,et al.  Knowledge Machines: Language and Information in a Technological Society , 1995 .

[11]  Chih-Hsiung Tu,et al.  On-line learning migration: from social learning theory to social presence theory in a CMC environment , 2000, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[12]  Somaiya Naidu.  Learning and Teaching with Technology : Principles and Practices , 2003 .

[13]  Arthur N. Applebee.  Curriculum as Conversation: Transforming Traditions of Teaching and Learning. , 1996 .

[14]  Jacob L. Mey,et al.  Pragmatics: An Introduction , 2001 .

[15]  Linda M. Harasim,et al.  Online Education: Perspectives on a New Environment , 1990 .

[16]  Jorge Larreamendy-Joerns,et al.  Making Explicit the Implicit: Classroom Explanations and Conversational Implicatures , 1998 .

[17]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[18]  Robin Mason,et al.  Evaluation Methodologies for Computer Conferencing Applications , 1992 .

[19]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment , 1997 .

[20]  Karol I. Pelc,et al.  The virtual classroom: Learning without limits via computer networks , 1996 .

[21]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[22]  Dawn M. Poole.  Student Participation in a Discussion-Oriented Online Course , 2000 .

[23]  Martin Nystrand,et al.  Opening Dialogue: Understanding the Dynamics of Language and Learning in the English Classroom (Language and Literacy Series) , 1996 .

[24]  G. Green.  Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding , 1990 .

[25]  David W. Park,et al.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[26]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1989 .

[27]  J. Bruner.  Child's Talk: Learning to Use Language , 1985 .