Risk Analysis and Management for Marine Systems

Sources of risk to marine systems include equipment failure, external events, human error, and institutional error. Equipment failure, the most readily recognized hazard on ships, may be categorized as either independent failure, such as the loss of steering because of the failure of a power steering pump or common-cause failure, such as the loss of propulsion and steering resulting from a total loss of electrical power to the ship. Risk from external events arises from hazards such as collision with other ships, sea state; wind, and ice or other weather factors. Humans provide another source of risk to marine systems when they lack skill, are excessively fatigued, or commit sabotage. Institutional failure creates risks from poor management including inadequate training, poor communications, and low morale. Risk studies may be classified according to whether they focus primarily on assessment, management, or communication; these aspects of risk studies are described to prepare users and readers of this paper for performing risk-based analysis of marine systems. Methods are provided in the paper that can be used to develop risk-based standards for system safety. The relationship between risk and standards is studied from a historical perspective. Great successes in controlling risk to health and safety are exemplified by the development of design methods for buildings, bridges, or super tankers that render them capable of withstanding extreme storms. Yet, familiar risks persist while less familiar ones escape attention and new ones appear. Ironically, management of some of the most difficult risks has led to improved standards of living. This paper provides background information, introduces fundamental concepts, and offers examples of risk methods applied to marine systems.

[1]  C. Starr Social benefit versus technological risk. , 1969, Science.

[2]  C. Julius Wang,et al.  What Every Engineer Should Know about Reliability and Risk Analysis , 1993 .

[3]  Maurice Bryson,et al.  Probability, Statistics, and Reliability for Engineers , 1997, Technometrics.

[4]  Robert G. Easierling An Anatomy of Risk , 1977 .

[5]  D. E. Allen,et al.  Criteria for Design Safety Factors and Quality Assurance Expenditure , 1981 .

[6]  Milan Zeleny,et al.  An Anatomy of Risk , 1978 .

[7]  Hiromitsu Kumamoto,et al.  Probabilistic Risk Assessment and Management for Engineers and Scientists , 1996 .

[8]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Risk Analysis: Understanding “How Safe is Safe Enough?“ , 1981 .

[9]  Hideyuki Suzuki Safety target of very large floating structure used as a floating airport , 2001 .

[10]  Dan Litai,et al.  A risk comparison methodology for the assessment of acceptable risk , 1980 .

[11]  Paul Gruhn The pros and cons of qualitative & quantitative analysis of safety systems , 1991 .

[12]  Robert V. Whitman,et al.  EVALUATING CALCULATED RISK IN GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING , 1984 .

[13]  Norman C. Rasmussen,et al.  The Application of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Techniques to Energy Technologies , 1981 .

[14]  R. Cooke Elicitation of expert opinions for uncertainty and risks , 2003 .

[15]  Jeffrey E. Beach,et al.  Methodology for the development of reliability-based design criteria for surface ship structures , 1995 .

[16]  K. Andolsek,et al.  Risk assessment , 2003, Nature.

[17]  C. Mahoney,et al.  Managing risk , 2011 .

[18]  F. Farmer REACTOR SAFETY AND SITING: A PROPOSED RISK CRITERION. , 1967 .