On Decisions for Integration Implementation: An Examination of Complementarities Between Product-Process Technology Integration and Supply Chain Integration

Research has shown that both product-process technology (PPT) integration and supply chain integration efforts produce operational benefits, yet synergies between these types of integration are not well understood. This article empirically examines strategic customer integration and supplier integration as complementary activities for PPT integration, with the aim of helping manufacturing plant managers to intelligently implement mutually supportive types of integration. We set two conditions for establishing complementarity: (i) one type of strategic integration must positively influence the adoption of another and (ii) the two types of strategic integration must exhibit a synergistic fit with respect to manufacturing plant capabilities. We test these conditions using survey results representing 224 manufacturing plants. The findings show positive complementarities between PPT integration and supplier integration with respect to quality, delivery, and process flexibility. Also, positive complementarities exist between PPT integration and customer integration with respect to quality and new product flexibility. The results extend the emerging theory of strategic value chain integration and provide guidance to manufacturing managers who wish to assemble strategic integration policies.

[1]  S. Snell,et al.  THE STRATEGIC USE OF INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION , 1996 .

[2]  S. Vickery,et al.  The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships , 2003 .

[3]  Eve D. Rosenzweig,et al.  The influence of an integration strategy on competitive capabilities and business performance: An exploratory study of consumer products manufacturers , 2003 .

[4]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Managing beyond the factory walls: Effects of four types of strategic integration on manufacturing plant performance , 2007 .

[5]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Specification and estimation of simultaneous equation models , 1983 .

[6]  J. Ettlie Product-process development integration in manufacturing , 1995 .

[7]  M. Frohlich,et al.  Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies , 2001 .

[8]  Donald Gerwin,et al.  An Evaluation of Research on Integrated Product Development , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[9]  K. Eisenhardt Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[10]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  The joint influence of technology uncertainty and interorganizational interaction on external technology integration success , 2008 .

[11]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Effect of supply chain integration on the relationship between diversification and performance: evidence from Japanese and Korean firms , 2002 .

[12]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Sourcing By Design: Product Complexity and the Supply Chain , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization , 1990 .

[14]  G. Stevens Integrating the Supply Chain , 1989 .

[15]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Contribution of Strategic Sourcing to Manufacturing Flexibilities and Performance , 1999 .

[16]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[17]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[18]  Soo Wook Kim,et al.  Manufacturing Practices and Strategy Integration: Effects on Cost Efficiency, Flexibility, and Market-Based Performance , 2005, Decis. Sci..

[19]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  Interdepartmental Interdependence and Coordination: The Case of the Design/Manufacturing Interface , 1995 .

[20]  T. C. Powell Organizational alignment as competitive advantage , 1992 .

[21]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  The Performance Effects of Complementarities Between Information Systems, Marketing, Manufacturing, and Supply Chain Processes , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Holistic Customer Requirements and the Design-Select Decision , 1999 .

[23]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[24]  Xenophon Koufteros,et al.  Internal and External Integration for Product Development: The Contingency Effects of Uncertainty, Equivocality, and Platform Strategy , 2005, Decis. Sci..

[25]  Morgan Swink,et al.  Design-manufacturing integration as a mediator of antecedents to new product design quality , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[26]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[27]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[28]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Steven Wright Manufacturing strategy: Defining the missing link , 1984 .

[30]  John E. Ettlie,et al.  Integrated design and new product success , 1997 .

[31]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .