Mechanism with unique learnable equilibria

The existence of a unique equilibrium is the classic tool for ensuring predictiveness of game theory. Typical uniqueness results, however, are for Nash and Bayes-Nash equilibria and do not guarantee that natural game playing dynamic converges to this equilibrium. In fact, there are well known examples in which the equilibrium is unique, yet natural learning behavior does not converge to it. Motivated by this, we strive for stronger uniqueness results. We do not only require that there is a unique equilibrium, but also that this equilibrium must be learnable. We adopt correlated equilibrium as our solution concept, as simple and natural learning algorithms guarantee that the empirical distribution of play converges to the space of correlated equilibria. Our main result is to show uniqueness of correlated equilibria in a large class of single-parameter mechanisms with matroid structure. We also show that our uniqueness result extends to problems with polymatroid structure under some conditions. Our model includes a number of special cases interesting on their own right, such as procurement auctions and Bertrand competitions. An interesting feature of our model is that we do not need to assume that the players have quasi-linear utilities, and hence can incorporate models with risk averse players and certain forms of externalities.

[1]  R. Aumann Subjectivity and Correlation in Randomized Strategies , 1974 .

[2]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Rationalizability, Learning, and Equilibrium in Games with Strategic Complementarities , 1990 .

[3]  X. Vives Nash equilibrium with strategic complementarities , 1990 .

[4]  Wolfgang Leininger,et al.  Asymmetric All-Pay Auctions with Incomplete Information: The Two-Player Case , 1996 .

[5]  Michael R. Baye,et al.  A folk theorem for one-shot Bertrand games , 1999 .

[6]  David Wettstein,et al.  The possibility of mixed-strategy equilibria with constant-returns-to-scale technology under Bertrand competition , 2000 .

[7]  Patrick Bajari,et al.  Comparing competition and collusion: a numerical approach , 2001 .

[8]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  A crash course in implementation theory , 2001, Soc. Choice Welf..

[9]  Thomas R. Palfrey,et al.  Chapter 61 Implementation theory , 2002 .

[10]  Eric Maskin,et al.  Chapter 5 Implementation theory , 2002 .

[11]  John Riley,et al.  Uniqueness of equilibrium in sealed high-bid auctions , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[12]  A. Odlyzko Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce , 2003 .

[13]  Alexander Schrijver,et al.  Combinatorial optimization. Polyhedra and efficiency. , 2003 .

[14]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Computing correlated equilibria in multi-player games , 2005, STOC '05.

[15]  Paul W. Goldberg,et al.  The complexity of computing a Nash equilibrium , 2006, STOC '06.

[16]  Bernard Lebrun,et al.  Uniqueness of the equilibrium in first-price auctions , 2006, Games Econ. Behav..

[17]  Avrim Blum,et al.  Routing without regret: on convergence to nash equilibria of regret-minimizing algorithms in routing games , 2006, PODC '06.

[18]  Y. Mansour,et al.  Algorithmic Game Theory: Learning, Regret Minimization, and Equilibria , 2007 .

[19]  Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi,et al.  Automated Online Mechanism Design and Prophet Inequalities , 2007, AAAI.

[20]  Computing correlated equilibria in multi-player games , 2008, JACM.

[21]  John Wu,et al.  Correlated Equilibrium of Bertrand Competition , 2008, WINE.

[22]  Yishay Mansour,et al.  On the convergence of regret minimization dynamics in concave games , 2009, STOC '09.

[23]  Georgios Piliouras,et al.  No Regret Learning in Oligopolies: Cournot vs. Bertrand , 2010, SAGT.

[24]  Shuchi Chawla,et al.  Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing , 2010, BQGT.

[25]  Saeed Alaei,et al.  Bayesian Combinatorial Auctions: Expanding Single Buyer Mechanisms to Many Buyers , 2011, 2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[26]  Renato Paes Leme,et al.  On the efficiency of equilibria in generalized second price auctions , 2011, EC '11.

[27]  Sven de Vries,et al.  An Ascending Vickrey Auction for Selling Bases of a Matroid , 2011, Oper. Res..

[28]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Beyond the Nash Equilibrium Barrier , 2011, ICS.

[29]  Kevin Leyton-Brown,et al.  Polynomial-time computation of exact correlated equilibrium in compact games , 2010, EC '11.

[30]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  The price of anarchy in games of incomplete information , 2012, SECO.

[31]  V. Mirrokni,et al.  Polyhedral clinching auctions and the adwords polytope , 2012, STOC '12.

[32]  T. Roughgarden Intrinsic robustness of the price of anarchy , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[33]  S. Matthew Weinberg,et al.  Matroid prophet inequalities , 2012, STOC '12.

[34]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Composable and efficient mechanisms , 2012, STOC '13.

[35]  S. Hart,et al.  Simple Adaptive Strategies: From Regret-matching To Uncoupled Dynamics , 2013 .

[36]  Jason D. Hartline,et al.  Auctions with unique equilibria , 2013, EC '13.

[37]  Moshe Babaioff,et al.  Bertrand networks , 2013, EC '13.

[38]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  The performance of deferred-acceptance auctions , 2014, Math. Oper. Res..

[39]  Ilya Segal,et al.  Deferred-acceptance auctions and radio spectrum reallocation , 2014, EC.

[40]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Modularity and greed in double auctions , 2014, Games Econ. Behav..

[41]  Gagan Goel,et al.  Polyhedral Clinching Auctions and the AdWords Polytope , 2012, J. ACM.

[42]  Paul Dütting,et al.  Polymatroid Prophet Inequalities , 2013, ESA.