Women's interpretation of cervical smear test results
暂无分享,去创建一个
Screening for cervical cancer using the Papanicolaou smear test has been available in England since the 1960s, yet very little is known about how women interpret their test results. This questionnaire study required women to explain, in their own words, the meaning of normal and abnormal test results. It was discovered that the use of the word cell as a description of findings was extremely common, and that a proportion of subjects equated abnormal results with technical inadequacy. The frequency of circularity in the interpretations, i.e. interpreting ‘normal’ as ‘not abnormal’ and vice versa, was striking. Contrary to previous research, we find that, whilst many women interpret normal results as indicating the current absence of cancer, few appear to believe that future cancer is thereby definitively ruled out. By the same token, only a very small minority interpret abnormal results as definitive of cancer.
[1] P Sasieni,et al. Women's understanding of a “normal smear test result”: experimental questionnaire based study , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[2] F. Fylan. Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women's attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour. , 1998, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
[3] A. Kavanagh,et al. Women's understanding of abnormal cervical smear test results: a qualitative interview study , 1997, BMJ.