Contingent durations in temporal CSPs: from consistency to controllabilities

Temporal Constraint Networks (TCSP) allow to express minimal and maximal durations between time-points. Though being used in many research areas, this model disregards the contingent nature of some constraints, whose effective duration cannot be decided by the system but is provided by the external world. We propose an extension of TCSP in which the classical network consistency property must be redefined in terms of controllability: intuitively, we would like to say that a network is controllable if it is consistent in any situation (i.e. any assignment of the whole set of contingent intervals) that may arise in the external world. Three levels of controllability must be distinguished, namely the Strong, the Weak and the Dynamic ones. This preliminary report mainly stresses the representation and concept issues, discussing their relevance in dynamic application domains, and partially tackles the reasoning issues (complexity, algorithms and tractable subclasses).

[1]  Johan de Kleer,et al.  Readings in qualitative reasoning about physical systems , 1990 .

[2]  Joseph Sifakis,et al.  On the Synthesis of Discrete Controllers for Timed Systems (An Extended Abstract) , 1995, STACS.

[3]  James F. Allen Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals , 1983, CACM.

[4]  Malik Ghallab,et al.  Dealing with Uncertain Durations In Temporal Constraint Networks dedicated to Planning , 1996, ECAI.

[5]  Rina Dechter,et al.  Temporal Constraint Networks , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[6]  Bernhard Nebel,et al.  Reasoning about temporal relations: a maximal tractable subclass of Allen's interval algebra , 1994, JACM.

[7]  Peter Jonsson,et al.  Eight Maximal Tractable Subclasses of Allen's Algebra with Metric Time , 1997, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[8]  Eugene C. Freuder,et al.  The Complexity of Some Polynomial Network Consistency Algorithms for Constraint Satisfaction Problems , 1985, Artif. Intell..

[9]  Malik Ghallab,et al.  Managing Efficiently Temporal Relations Through Indexed Spanning Trees , 1989, IJCAI.

[10]  Christian Bessiere,et al.  Global Consistency in Interval Algebra Networks: Tractable Subclasses , 1996, ECAI.

[11]  Barbara Pernici,et al.  LaTeR: A General Purpose Manager of Temporal Information , 1994, ISMIS.

[12]  Didier Dubois,et al.  The Use of Fuzzy Constraints in Job-Shop Scheduling. , 1994 .

[13]  Thomas Schiex,et al.  Mixed Constraint Satisfaction: A Framework for Decision Problems under Incomplete Knowledge , 1996, AAAI/IAAI, Vol. 1.

[14]  Malik Ghallab,et al.  Situation Recognition: Representation and Algorithms , 1993, IJCAI.

[15]  Jürgen Dorn,et al.  Hybrid Temporal Reasoning , 1994, ECAI.

[16]  Vipin Kumar,et al.  Algorithms for Constraint-Satisfaction Problems: A Survey , 1992, AI Mag..

[17]  Itay Meiri,et al.  Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Constraints in Temporal Reasoning , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[18]  Henry Kautz,et al.  Constraint propagation algorithms: A revised report , 1990 .

[19]  Nabil Layaida,et al.  Time representation and management in MADEUS: an authoring environment for multimedia documents , 1997, Electronic Imaging.