The Crucial Role of Cultural Probes in Participatory Design for and with Older Adults

Abstract Software systems meant to support older adults often are not well accepted as they do not meet the expectations and requirements of the target group. An involvement of older adults in system design seems imperative. The project ParTec investigated and evaluated techniques for participatory software development with regard to their suitability for communication and equal cooperation with older adults. With a group of 15 retirees we developed concepts for an online neighbourhood platform. Using various participatory techniques researchers and participants developed a deep common understanding of everyday life in early retirement, determined requirements and co-created design ideas and concepts. We will show that the use of cultural probes with subsequent qualitative interviews forms an ideal starting point and a strong fundament for a participatory design process with older adults.

[1]  Stephen Lindsay,et al.  Engaging older people using participatory design , 2012, CHI.

[2]  Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders,et al.  From user-centered to participatory design approaches , 2002 .

[3]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design , 2012 .

[4]  S. Dyk,et al.  Leben im Ruhestand: Zur Neuverhandlung des Alters in der Aktivgesellschaft , 2014 .

[5]  S. Dyk,et al.  Leben im Ruhestand , 2014 .

[6]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[7]  Martin Johansson,et al.  Present-ing the user: constructing the persona , 2005, Digit. Creativity.

[8]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[9]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Design: Cultural probes , 1999, INTR.

[10]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Personas, Participatory Design and Product Development: An Infrastructure for Engagement , 2002 .

[11]  J. Jacko,et al.  The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications , 2002 .

[12]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches , 2004 .

[13]  Paul Dourish,et al.  How HCI interprets the probes , 2007, CHI.

[14]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity (2nd Edition) , 1999 .

[15]  A. Lancaster,et al.  Paper Prototyping: The Fast and Easy Way to Design and Refine User Interfaces , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[16]  Keith Cheverst,et al.  How probes work , 2007, OZCHI '07.

[17]  Carlos Jensen,et al.  Participatory design with older adults: an analysis of creativity in the design of mobile healthcare applications , 2013, Creativity & Cognition.

[18]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Never too old: engaging retired people inventing the future with MaKey MaKey , 2014, CHI.

[19]  Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders,et al.  Tools and techniques: ways to engage telling, making and enacting , 2012 .

[20]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Scenario-based design , 2002 .

[21]  John L. Arnott,et al.  Methods for human – computer interaction research with older people , 2007, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[22]  Alan Cooper,et al.  About Face 3: the essentials of interaction design , 1995 .

[23]  George Palaigeorgiou,et al.  Fictional characters in participatory design sessions: Introducing the "design alter egos" technique , 2010, Interact. Comput..

[24]  Tomas Sokoler,et al.  Communities of everyday practice and situated elderliness as an approach to co-design for senior interaction , 2010, OZCHI '10.