Quantity and quality of food losses along the Swiss potato supply chain: Stepwise investigation and the influence of quality standards on losses.

This paper presents the results of a stepwise investigation of the quantity and quality of food losses along the Swiss potato supply chain. Quantitative data were collected from field trials, from structured interviews with wholesalers, processors and retailers, and from consumer surveys in combination with a 30-day diary study. The "Swiss trade customs for potatoes" pose the basis for the qualitative evaluation of losses. The influences of technological, institutional (business and economy; legislation and policy), and social drivers on the generation of fresh potato and processed potato products losses were assessed. Losses due to quality standards driven by food safety and consumer preferences for certain aesthetic standards have been evaluated too. Across the entire potato value chain, approximately 53-55% of the initial fresh potato production and 41-46% of the initial processing potato production are finally lost. Losses between organic and non-organic supply chains differ from 2% to 5%. From the total initial fresh potato production, 15-24% gets lost during agricultural production, a further 12-24% at wholesalers, 1-3% at retailers, and 15% at private households. In comparison, 5-11% of the initial production gets lost at wholesalers, a further 14-15% during processing, 0% at retailers, and 2% at private households. Losses during agricultural production do not vary much (13-25%) between fresh and processing potatoes. Approximately half of total potato losses occur because potatoes do not meet quality standards. 25-34% of these quality-driven losses are caused by food safety reasons, and the remainder are caused by consumer preferences or suitability for storage. In total, social drivers (e.g., consumer preferences, behavior, or socio-demographical factors) are responsible for two-thirds to three-fourths of all fresh potato losses and 40-45% of all processing potato losses. Technological drivers cause circa one-third of the total processing potato losses. The majority of the rejected potatoes are used as animal feed (67-90%) in Switzerland. Approximately 30% of all fresh potato losses are disposed while just 4-5% of all processing potato losses are thrown away. The interviewed experts stated that lower quality specifications might cause lower loss rates at the first stages of the supply chain but higher ones at the later stages due to worse storage or processing abilities of potatoes with defects, which also might affect proper tubers.

[1]  P. Nisha,et al.  A comparative evaluation of antioxidant and antidiabetic potential of peel from young and matured potato , 2015 .

[2]  M. Siegrist,et al.  The consumer’s perception of artificial food additives: Influences on acceptance, risk and benefit perceptions , 2014 .

[3]  D. Buss,et al.  Household food wastage in Britain , 1980, British Journal of Nutrition.

[4]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Quantifying food losses and the potential for reduction in Switzerland. , 2013, Waste management.

[5]  M. Fehr,et al.  Measurement of Fruit and Vegetable Losses in Brazil: A Case Study , 2001 .

[6]  Christine Göbel,et al.  Food waste in the Swiss food service industry - Magnitude and potential for reduction. , 2015, Waste management.

[7]  Kirsi Silvennoinen,et al.  Influence of socio-demographical, behavioural and attitudinal factors on the amount of avoidable food waste generated in Finnish households , 2012 .

[8]  J. Parfitt,et al.  Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050 , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  D. Mercer,et al.  Food Waste in Australia: The Freegan Response , 2012 .

[10]  Alma Hodzic,et al.  Food for Thought? — A UK pilot study testing a methodology for compositional domestic food waste analysis , 2010, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[11]  Wayne Martindale,et al.  Waste: uncovering the global food scandal , 2010 .

[12]  Karin Östergren,et al.  FUSIONS Definitional Framework for Food Waste , 2014 .

[13]  Kirsi Silvennoinen,et al.  Food waste in the Finnish food chain , 2014 .

[14]  K. Östergren,et al.  Drivers of current food waste generation, threats of future increase and opportunities for reduction , 2014 .

[15]  Kate Parizeau,et al.  Household-level dynamics of food waste production and related beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours in Guelph, Ontario. , 2015, Waste management.

[16]  P. Stamp,et al.  Quality deficiencies on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers caused by Rhizoctonia solani, wireworms (Agriotes ssp.) and slugs (Deroceras reticulatum, Arion hortensis) in different farming systems , 2012 .

[17]  U. Sonesson,et al.  Global food losses and food waste: extent, causes and prevention , 2011 .

[18]  M. Camire,et al.  Potatoes and Human Health , 2009, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[19]  V. Oliveira,et al.  Estimating and Addressing America's Food Losses , 1997 .

[20]  W. Kuiper,et al.  Limits to growth in organic sales : price elasticity of consumer demand for organic food in Dutch supermarkets , 2007 .

[21]  Gérard P. Cachon Stock Wars: Inventory Competition in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain with Multiple Retailers , 2001, Oper. Res..

[22]  A. Worsley,et al.  Consumers' attitudes towards imported food products , 1998 .

[23]  Kevin D. Hall,et al.  The Progressive Increase of Food Waste in America and Its Environmental Impact , 2009, PloS one.