Blind unmixing of remote sensing data with some pure pixels: Extension and comparison of spatial methods exploiting sparsity and nonnegativity properties

Multispectral and hyperspectral imaging systems are among the most powerful tools in the field of remote sensing. In remote sensing imagery, pixel values are often linear mixtures of contributions from pure materials contained in the observed scene. In this paper, we extend our recently developed spatial methods for blindly unmixing each pixel of remote sensing data with some pure pixels and we compare their performance, both for multispectral and hyperspectral images. These extended methods are related to the blind source separation (BSS) problem, and are based on sparse component analysis (SCA) and nonnegativity constraints. Spatial correlation-based or variance-based SCA algorithms (which detect a few pure-pixel zones) are firstly used to identify the mixing matrix by means of two different approaches for selecting the columns of this matrix. Nonnegative least squares (NLS) or nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) methods are then used to extract spatial sources. Experiments based on realistic synthetic data are performed to compare the accuracies and the computational costs of these extended methods. We show that the tested methods yield high accuracy with low computational cost for the variance-based methods as compared to those based on correlation.

[1]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Fully constrained least squares linear spectral mixture analysis method for material quantification in hyperspectral imagery , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  Yannick Deville,et al.  A new spatial sparsity-based method for extracting endmember spectra from hyperspectral data with some pure pixels , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[3]  S. J. Sutley,et al.  USGS Digital Spectral Library splib06a , 2007 .

[4]  Victoria Stodden,et al.  When Does Non-Negative Matrix Factorization Give a Correct Decomposition into Parts? , 2003, NIPS.

[5]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization , 1999, Nature.

[6]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Hyperspectral Unmixing Overview: Geometrical, Statistical, and Sparse Regression-Based Approaches , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Yannick Deville,et al.  A time-frequency blind signal separation method applicable to underdetermined mixtures of dependent sources , 2005, Signal Process..

[8]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Algorithms for Non-negative Matrix Factorization , 2000, NIPS.

[9]  Yannick Deville,et al.  Temporal and time-frequency correlation-based blind source separation methods. Part I: Determined and underdetermined linear instantaneous mixtures , 2007, Signal Process..

[10]  Yannick Deville,et al.  Blind spatial unmixing of multispectral images: New methods combining sparse component analysis, clustering and non-negativity constraints , 2012, Pattern Recognit..

[11]  Yannick Deville,et al.  Blind Separation methods based on correlation for sparse possibly-correlated images , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[12]  Özgür Yilmaz,et al.  Blind separation of disjoint orthogonal signals: demixing N sources from 2 mixtures , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37100).

[13]  Pierre Comon,et al.  Handbook of Blind Source Separation: Independent Component Analysis and Applications , 2010 .

[14]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Nonnegative Matrix and Tensor Factorization T , 2007 .