Opportunistic Role Selection for Two-User Amplify-and-Forward Relaying Systems

In this paper, we establish a two-user opportunistic cooperative framework, where two users compete to transmit their own information to a common destination. For such a framework, by relying on the instantaneous channel conditions, either of the two users can opportunely play the role of an information source, and the other user will serve as an amplify-and-forward (AF) relay. To enhance the transmission reliability in terms of system outage probability, an optimal and centralized role selection (C-ROSE) scheme is first proposed, which maximizes the received signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the destination. To alleviate the signaling overhead of C-ROSE, a distributed ROSE (D-ROSE) scheme is presented by invoking a local channel state information (CSI) exploitation/decision mechanism, which can lower the signaling overhead while maintaining almost the same outage performance as that of C-ROSE. With the user fairness in mind and owing to the distributed decision rule of D-ROSE, a proportional fair scheduling (PFS) strategy is incorporated into D-ROSE, such that the two users have an equal opportunity to act as a source. We refer to this new ROSE scheme as P-ROSE. To reveal the inherent impacts of different link statistics on the system outage behavior, closed-form lower and upper bound expressions are derived for the outage probability of the three ROSE schemes. Moreover, asymptotic outage analysis points out that the high-SNR outage behaviors of the three schemes are exactly the same and are dominated by the user-destination links, irrespective of the interuser link. Furthermore, both theoretical analysis and numerical results manifest that 1) under the scenario of balanced user-destination links, the outage performance of the three ROSE schemes are almost the same over the entire SNR regions and that 2) under the scenario of unbalanced user-destination links, the outage performance of P-ROSE is inferior to that of C-ROSE and D-ROSE from low-to-medium SNR regions, particularly in the case of a weak interuser link. In addition, representative numerical examples are shown to demonstrate the effects of node placement on the system outage performance, signaling overhead, and user fairness of the three ROSE schemes, from which the tradeoff between outage performance and user fairness of the three schemes are numerically examined.

[1]  Hyundong Shin,et al.  Cooperative Communications with Outage-Optimal Opportunistic Relaying , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[2]  Daniel Benevides da Costa,et al.  Spectrally Efficient Diversity Exploitation Schemes for Downlink Cooperative Cellular Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[3]  Xing Zhang,et al.  Multiuser Diversity in Multiuser Two-Hop Cooperative Relay Wireless Networks: System Model and Performance Analysis , 2009, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[4]  Daniel Benevides da Costa,et al.  Link Selection Schemes for Selection Relaying Systems With Transmit Beamforming: New and Efficient Proposals From a Distributed Concept , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[5]  Erik G. Larsson On the combination of spatial diversity and multiuser diversity , 2004, IEEE Communications Letters.

[6]  Il-Min Kim,et al.  Opportunistic Source/Destination Cooperation in Cooperative Diversity Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[7]  Robert Schober,et al.  Diversity Analysis of Multi-User Multi-Relay Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[8]  Daniel Benevides da Costa,et al.  A New Efficient Low-Complexity Scheme for Multi-Source Multi-Relay Cooperative Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[9]  Gregory W. Wornell,et al.  Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[10]  Anders Høst-Madsen,et al.  Capacity bounds for Cooperative diversity , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[11]  Li Sun,et al.  On the Combination of Cooperative Diversity and Multiuser Diversity in Multi-Source Multi-Relay Wireless Networks , 2010, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[12]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Performance analysis of multiuser selection diversity , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577).

[13]  Huaiyu Dai,et al.  Asymptotic Analysis on the Interaction Between Spatial Diversity and Multiuser Diversity in Wireless Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[14]  Xing Zhang,et al.  Performance analysis of multiuser diversity in cooperative multi-relay networks under rayleigh-fading channels , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[15]  Aria Nosratinia,et al.  Grouping and partner selection in cooperative wireless networks , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[16]  Elza Erkip,et al.  User cooperation diversity. Part I. System description , 2003, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[17]  Jinhong Yuan,et al.  Impact of Opportunistic Scheduling on Cooperative Dual-Hop Relay Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[18]  Jinhong Yuan,et al.  Outage Probability of Multiuser Relay Networks in Nakagami- $m$ Fading Channels , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[19]  B. Sklar,et al.  Rayleigh Fading Channels in Mobile Digital Communication Systems Part II: Mitigation , 1997, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[20]  Georgios B. Giannakis,et al.  Smart Regenerative Relays for Link-Adaptive Cooperative Communications , 2006 .

[21]  David Tse,et al.  Opportunistic beamforming using dumb antennas , 2002, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[22]  Urbashi Mitra,et al.  Capacity Gain From Two-Transmitter and Two-Receiver Cooperation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.