Adoption of innovative energy systems in social housing: Lessons from eight large-scale renovation projects in The Netherlands

Thanks to new insights on the impacts that dwellings have throughout their life cycles, there has been increased attention to retrofitting innovative energy systems (IES) in existing housing. This paper uses an explorative case study design to gain more knowledge about the governance aspects of this under-researched topic. The central research question is: Which factors influence the adoption of innovative energy systems in social housing sites during renovation projects? To answer this question, eight large-scale renovation projects in The Netherlands were investigated. These case studies allowed the identification of barriers, enabling factors and perspectives from three main actors—housing associations, tenants and local authorities. It turns out that adopting IES encounters many barriers: lack of trust between project partners, delay in project progress, financial feasibility considerations, lack of support from tenants, lengthy legal permit procedures, over-ambitious project goals, poor experiences in previous projects, and IES ambitions that are not taken serious by key decision-makers. Furthermore, IES were only successfully fitted in three of the eight projects. Moreover, ambitions were lowered as the projects progressed in all the cases investigated. The study calls for further systematic, in-depth comparison of fitting IES in large-scale renovation projects in social housing.

[1]  Maarten J. Arentsen.  Environmental Governance in a Multi-Level Institutional Setting , 2008 .

[2]  Walter J.V. Vermeulen,et al.  Competing explanations for adopting energy innovations for new office buildings , 2006 .

[3]  Richard M. Walker,et al.  Measuring the performance of social housing organisations in England and The Netherlands: A policy review and research agenda , 2000 .

[4]  H. Priemus.  How to Make Housing Sustainable? The Dutch Experience , 2005 .

[5]  Pieter Glasbergen,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Reduction in Housing: Experiences in Urban Renewal Projects in the Netherlands , 2003 .

[6]  Hugo Priemus,et al.  Dutch Housing Associations: Current Developments and Debates , 2003 .

[7]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  Target group segmentation makes sense: If one sheep leaps over the ditch, all the rest will follow , 2006 .

[8]  E. M. Van Bueren,et al.  Greening Governance: an Evolutionary Approach to Policy Making for a Sustainable Built Environment , 2009 .

[9]  Thomas Hoppe,et al.  Local government influence on energy conservation ambitions in existing housing sites—Plucking the low-hanging fruit? , 2011 .

[10]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  Ad Straub,et al.  Strategic technical management of housing stock: lessons from Dutch housing associations , 2002 .

[12]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[13]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[14]  M. Sunikka.  Policies and regulations for sustainable building: A comparative study of five European countries , 2001 .

[15]  Thomas Hoppe,et al.  Creating an analytical framework for local sustainability performance: a Dutch Case Study , 2011 .

[16]  M. M. Sunikka,et al.  Environmental policies and efforts in social housing: the Netherlands , 2003 .

[17]  Carel Dieperink,et al.  Diffusion of energy-saving innovations in industry and the built environment: Dutch studies as inputs for a more integrated analytical framework , 2004 .

[18]  Nico Nieboer,et al.  Energy-Efficient Asset Management for Professional Landlords , 2008 .

[19]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[20]  Helen Kruythoff,et al.  Tenant Participation in the Netherlands: The Role of Laws, Covenants and (Power) Positions , 2008 .

[21]  Joop Koppenjan,et al.  Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector , 1997 .

[22]  Franciscus H.J.M. Coenen.  probing the essence of LA21 as a vallue-added approach to sustainable development and local democracy; the case of the Netherlands , 1999 .

[23]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[24]  Harald Rohracher,et al.  Managing the Technological Transition to Sustainable Construction of Buildings: A Socio-Technical Perspective , 2001, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[25]  Thomas Hoppe,et al.  The Impact of Multi-Level Governance on Energy Performance in the Current Dutch Housing Stock , 2008 .

[26]  B. Boardman,et al.  Making cold homes warmer: the effect of energy efficiency improvements in low-income homes A report to the Energy Action Grants Agency Charitable Trust , 2000 .

[27]  Morten Elle,et al.  Rethinking Local Housing Policies and Energy Planning: The Importance of Contextual Dynamics , 2002 .

[28]  Harald Rohracher,et al.  User-led Innovations and Participation Processes: Lessons from Sustainable Energy Technologies , 2006 .

[29]  J. Peter Clinch,et al.  Quantifying the severity of fuel poverty, its relationship with poor housing and reasons for non-investment in energy-saving measures in Ireland , 2004 .

[30]  Thomas Hoppe,et al.  CO2 reductie in de bestaande woningbouw : een beleidswetenschappelijk onderzoek naar ambitie en realisatie , 2009 .