Studying complexity in health services research: desperately seeking an overdue paradigm shift

Complexity is much talked about but sub-optimally studied in health services research. Although the significance of the complex system as an analytic lens is increasingly recognised, many researchers are still using methods that assume a closed system in which predictive studies in general, and controlled experiments in particular, are possible and preferred. We argue that in open systems characterised by dynamically changing inter-relationships and tensions, conventional research designs predicated on linearity and predictability must be augmented by the study of how we can best deal with uncertainty, unpredictability and emergent causality. Accordingly, the study of complexity in health services and systems requires new standards of research quality, namely (for example) rich theorising, generative learning, and pragmatic adaptation to changing contexts. This framing of complexity-informed health services research provides a backdrop for a new collection of empirical studies. Each of the initial five papers in this collection illustrates, in different ways, the value of theoretically grounded, methodologically pluralistic, flexible and adaptive study designs. We propose an agenda for future research and invite researchers to contribute to this on-going series.

[1]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Realist RCTs of complex interventions - an oxymoron. , 2013, Social science & medicine.

[2]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program. , 2011, The Milbank quarterly.

[3]  Alan Shiell,et al.  Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  Annemarie Mol,et al.  Complexities: An Introduction , 2002, Complexities.

[5]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Complexity and clinical care , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Alan Shiell,et al.  Theorising Interventions as Events in Systems , 2009, American journal of community psychology.

[7]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Research impact in the community-based health sciences: an analysis of 162 case studies from the 2014 UK Research Excellence Framework , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[8]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Fiona McDermott,et al.  Being pragmatic about healthcare complexity: our experiences applying complexity theory and pragmatism to health services research , 2018, BMC Medicine.

[10]  H. Rutter,et al.  Using flawed, uncertain, proximate and sparse (FUPS) data in the context of complexity: learning from the case of child mental health , 2018, BMC Medicine.

[11]  M. Petticrew,et al.  The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health , 2017, The Lancet.

[12]  P. Plsek,et al.  The challenge of complexity in health care , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Beyond Adoption: A New Framework for Theorizing and Evaluating Nonadoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to the Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability of Health and Care Technologies , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[14]  Sarah W. Fraser,et al.  Coping with complexity: educating for capability , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  Sayra Cristancho,et al.  Lessons on resilience: Learning to manage complexity , 2016, Perspectives on Medical Education.

[16]  Jeffrey Braithwaite,et al.  When complexity science meets implementation science: a theoretical and empirical analysis of systems change , 2018, BMC Medicine.

[17]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  T. Greenhalgh How to Implement Evidence-Based Healthcare , 2017 .

[19]  C. Bunn,et al.  Entangled complexity: Why complex interventions are just not complicated enough , 2013, Journal of health services research & policy.

[20]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Infrastructure and Ethnographic Practice , 2002, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[21]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  Holly Jordan Lanham,et al.  How complexity science can inform scale-up and spread in health care: understanding the role of self-organization in variation across local contexts. , 2013, Social science & medicine.

[23]  B. Flyvbjerg Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[24]  Julie E. Reed,et al.  Simple rules for evidence translation in complex systems: A qualitative study , 2018, BMC Medicine.

[25]  Jeffrey Braithwaite,et al.  Integrated care in the emergency department: a complex adaptive systems perspective. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[26]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  Don't Simplify, Complexify: From Disjunctive to Conjunctive Theorizing in Organization and Management Studies , 2017 .

[27]  Alan Shiell,et al.  Complex interventions: how “out of control” can a randomised controlled trial be? , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  P. Plsek,et al.  Complexity, leadership, and management in healthcare organisations , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Analysing the role of complexity in explaining the fortunes of technology programmes: empirical application of the NASSS framework , 2018, BMC Medicine.