Effect of different drying methods on the morphology, crystallinity, swelling ability and tensile properties of nata de coco

Nata de coco or bacterial cellulose produced by Acetobacter xylinum is a unique type of biocellulose. It contains more than 90% of water. Dried nata was preferred compared to wet form since it is more convenient and portable with stable properties. Therefore, drying process is necessary in order to produce dried nata de coco. Drying method is a key factor that influenced the properties of dried nata de coco produced. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different drying methods on morphology, crystallinity, swelling ability and tensile strength of dried nata de coco. Nata de coco samples were dried using three physical drying methods such as oven, tray dryer or freeze dryer until it achieved 3-5% moisture content. Obviously, the three drying techniques produced web-like structured nata de coco and quite similar crystallinity which was in range between 87 and 89%. Freeze dried sample showed the largest swelling capacity and tensile strength which was found to be 148 MPa. Different drying method gave different properties of nata de coco. Therefore, the present work proposed the most suitable drying method can be utilized based on the properties of end product needed.

[1]  A. Stoica-Guzun,et al.  Controlled release of sorbic acid from bacterial cellulose based mono and multilayer antimicrobial films , 2012 .

[2]  Nadia Halib,et al.  Physicochemical Properties and Characterization of Nata de Coco from Local Food Industries as a Source of Cellulose , 2012 .

[3]  P. Zhu,et al.  Effect of Drying Methods on Structure and Mechanical Properties of Bacterial Cellulose Films , 2011 .

[4]  Feng F. Hong,et al.  Preparation and evaluation of a kind of bacterial cellulose dry films with antibacterial properties , 2011 .

[5]  S. Devahastin,et al.  Effects of drying methods and plasticizer concentration on some physical and mechanical properties of edible chitosan films , 2010 .

[6]  R. Singhal,et al.  Microbial Cellulose: Fermentative Production and Applications , 2009 .

[7]  M. Phisalaphong,et al.  Biosynthesis and characterization of bacteria cellulose-chitosan film , 2008 .

[8]  Sheng-Chi Wu,et al.  Application of bacterial cellulose pellets in enzyme immobilization , 2008 .

[9]  Thawatchai Maneerung,et al.  Impregnation of silver nanoparticles into bacterial cellulose for antimicrobial wound dressing , 2008 .

[10]  S. Keshk,et al.  Influence of lignosulfonate on crystal structure and productivity of bacterial cellulose in a static culture , 2006 .

[11]  W. Kulicke,et al.  Effects of Different Drying Processes on the Material Properties of Bacterial Cellulose Membranes , 2006 .

[12]  Norihiro Kato,et al.  Microporous, fast response cellulose ether hydrogel prepared by freeze-drying. , 2004, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[13]  Wojciech Czaja,et al.  Structural investigations of microbial cellulose produced in stationary and agitated culture , 2004 .

[14]  F. Podczeck,et al.  A study on the effect of drying techniques on the mechanical properties of pellets and compacted pellets. , 2004, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[15]  Maria Strømme,et al.  Moisture sorption by cellulose powders of varying crystallinity. , 2004, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[16]  C. L. Wang,et al.  Fermentation of Monascus purpureus on bacterial cellulose-nata and the color stability of Monascus-nata complex , 2000 .

[17]  L. Segal',et al.  An Empirical Method for Estimating the Degree of Crystallinity of Native Cellulose Using the X-Ray Diffractometer , 1959 .