A Self-Administered Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) Improves Arm Function During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: A Multi-Site Randomized Controlled Trial

Background and Purpose— More than 70% of individuals who have a stroke experience upper limb deficits that impact daily activities. Increased amount of upper limb therapy has positive effects; however, practical and inexpensive methods of therapy are needed to deliver this increase in therapy. Methods— This was a multi-site single blind randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of a 4-week self-administered graded repetitive upper limb supplementary program (GRASP) on arm recovery in stroke. 103 inpatients with stroke were randomized to the experimental group (GRASP group, n=53) or the control group (education protocol, n=50). The primary outcome measure was the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI), a measure of upper limb function in activities of daily living. Secondary measures were used to evaluate grip strength and paretic upper limb use outside of therapy time. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed. Group differences were tested using analysis of covariance. Results— At the end of the 4-week intervention (approximately 7 weeks poststroke), the GRASP group showed greater improvement in upper limb function (CAHAI) compared to the control group (mean difference 6.2; 95% CI: 3.4 to 9.0; P<0.001). The GRASP group maintained this significant gain at 5 months poststroke. Significant differences were also found in favor of the GRASP protocol for grip strength and paretic upper limb use. No serious adverse effects were experienced. Conclusion— A self-administered homework exercise program provides a cost-, time-, and treatment-effective delivery model for improving upper limb recovery in subacute stroke.

[1]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[2]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[3]  R. Lyle A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research , 1981, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[4]  N. Larocca,et al.  The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. , 1989, Archives of neurology.

[5]  Ailie Turton,et al.  The Use of Home Therapy Programmes for Improving Recovery of the Upper Limb following Stroke , 1990 .

[6]  D. Kersel,et al.  Screening tests for visual neglect following stroke , 1993 .

[7]  N. Miller,et al.  Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  T. Olsen,et al.  Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  J. Ware,et al.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. , 1996, Medical care.

[10]  M. Agop,et al.  Some physical implications of the gravitoelectromagnetic field in fractal space-time theory , 1998 .

[11]  L. von Koch,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of rehabilitation at home after stroke in southwest Stockholm. , 1998, Stroke.

[12]  A. Dromerick,et al.  Does the Application of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy During Acute Rehabilitation Reduce Arm Impairment After Ischemic Stroke? , 2000, Stroke.

[13]  D. Altman,et al.  Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Treatment Interventions for the Paretic Upper Limb of Stroke Survivors: A Critical Review , 2003, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[16]  C. Winstein,et al.  A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: A pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Effects of Augmented Exercise Therapy Time After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis , 2004, Stroke.

[18]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Measurement properties of the short form (SF)-12 applied to patients with stroke , 2004, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[19]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[20]  T Platz,et al.  Impairment-oriented training or Bobath therapy for severe arm paresis after stroke: a single-blind, multicentre randomized controlled trial , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[21]  P. Clark,et al.  Factors Influencing Stroke Survivors' Quality of Life During Subacute Recovery , 2005, Stroke.

[22]  E. Taub,et al.  Reliability and Validity of the Upper-Extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for Measuring Real-World Arm Use , 2005, Stroke.

[23]  L. Chipchase,et al.  Do early quadriceps exercises affect the outcome of ACL reconstruction? A randomised controlled trial. , 2005, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[24]  S. Brauer,et al.  Upper limb recovery after stroke: The stroke survivors' perspective , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[25]  A. Vickers Analysis of variance is easily misapplied in the analysis of randomized trials: a critique and discussion of alternative statistical approaches. , 2005, Psychosomatic medicine.

[26]  David L Streiner,et al.  Test-retest reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Chedoke arm and hand activity inventory: a new measure of upper-limb function for survivors of stroke. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  Susan D Horn,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: is earlier and more aggressive therapy better? , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  Joanne M Wagner,et al.  Measurement of upper-extremity function early after stroke: properties of the action research arm test. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[29]  Robert Teasell,et al.  Impact of early vs delayed admission to rehabilitation on functional outcomes in persons with stroke. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[30]  S. Haley,et al.  Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. , 2006, Physical therapy.

[31]  Alexander W Dromerick,et al.  Relationships between upper-limb functional limitation and self-reported disability 3 months after stroke. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[32]  Paul W. Stratford,et al.  Validation of Three Shortened Versions of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory , 2006 .

[33]  J. P. Miller,et al.  Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[34]  Julie Bernhardt,et al.  Little therapy, little physical activity: rehabilitation within the first 14 days of organized stroke unit care. , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[35]  J. Grotta,et al.  Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy During Early Stroke Rehabilitation , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[36]  K. Furie,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2008, Circulation.

[37]  B. Dobkin Interpreting the randomized clinical trial of constraint-induced movement therapy. , 2007, Archives of neurology.

[38]  Denis Gravel,et al.  Reliability of maximal static strength measurements of the arms in subjects with hemiparesis , 2007, Clinical rehabilitation.

[39]  F. Schmidt Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[40]  Bent Indredavik,et al.  Not All Stroke Units Are the Same: A Comparison of Physical Activity Patterns in Melbourne, Australia, and Trondheim, Norway , 2008, Stroke.