Effects of sensor spatial resolution on landscape structure parameters

We examined the effects of increasing grain size from 20 m to 1100 m on landscape parameters characterizing spatial structure in the northern Wisconsin lake district. We examined whether structural parameters remain relatively constant over this range and whether aggregation algorithms permit extrapolation within this range. Images from three different satellite sensors were employed in this study: (1) the SPOT multispectral high resolution visible (HRV), (2) the Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM), and (3) the NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR). Each scene was classified as patches of water in a matrix of land. Spatial structure was quantified using several landscape parameters: percent water, number of lakes (patches), average lake area and perimeter, fractal dimension, and three measures of texture (homogeneity, contrast, and entropy). Results indicate that most measures were sensitive to changes in grain size. As grain size increased from 20 m using HRV image data to 1100 m (AVHRR), the percent water and the number of lakes decreased while the average lake area, perimeter, the fractal dimension, and contrast increased. The other two texture measures were relatively invariant with grain size. Although examination of texture at various angles of adjacency was performed to investigate features which vary systematically with angle, the angle did not have an important effect on the texture parameter values. An aggregation algorithm was used to simulate additional grain sizes. Grain was increased successively by a factor of two from 20 m (the HRV image) to 1280 m. We then calculated landscape parameter values at each grain size. Extrapolated values closely approximated the actual sensor values. Because the grain size has an important effect on most landscape parameters, the choice of satellite sensor must be appropriate for the research question asked. Interpolation between the grain sizes of different satellite sensors is possible with an approach involving aggregation of pixels.

[1]  T. Rosswall,et al.  Ecosystem processes and global change. , 1988 .

[2]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[3]  C. Tucker,et al.  North American vegetation patterns observed with the NOAA-7 advanced very high resolution radiometer , 1985, Vegetatio.

[4]  Thomas B. Starr,et al.  Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity , 1982 .

[5]  John M. Briggs,et al.  The effect of spatial scale on Konza landscape classification using textural analysis , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[6]  Arthur S. Lieberman,et al.  Landscape Ecology , 1994, Springer New York.

[7]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote sensing and image interpretation. Second edition , 1987 .

[9]  Elgene O. Box,et al.  Scale Effects in Landscape Studies , 1987 .

[10]  M. Turner.  Spatial simulation of landscape changes in Georgia: A comparison of 3 transition models , 1987, Landscape Ecology.

[11]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The factor of scale in remote sensing , 1987 .

[12]  B. Milne.  Indications of Landscape Condition at Many Scales , 1992 .

[13]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Scaling of ‘landscapes’ in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle's perspective , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[14]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Predicting across scales: Theory development and testing , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[15]  Forrest G. Hall,et al.  Linking knowledge among spatial and temporal scales: Vegetation, atmosphere, climate and remote sensing , 1988, Landscape Ecology.

[16]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[17]  H. Delcourt,et al.  Dynamic plant ecology: the spectrum of vegetational change in space and time , 1982 .

[18]  Francesco di Castri,et al.  Enhancing the credibility of ecology: Interacting along and across hierarchical scales , 1988 .

[19]  L. Iverson,et al.  A technique for extrapolating and validating forest cover across large regions - Calibrating AVHRR data with TM data , 1989 .

[20]  P. Pizor.  Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment. , 1987 .

[21]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  Relating seasonal patterns of the AVHRR vegetation index to simulated photosynthesis and transpiration of forests in different climates , 1988 .

[22]  C. Sparrow.  The Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[23]  R. O'Neill.  A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. , 1986 .