Central Fetal Monitoring With and Without Computer Analysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether intrapartum fetal monitoring with computer analysis and real-time alerts decreases the rate of newborn metabolic acidosis or obstetric intervention when compared with visual analysis. METHODS A randomized clinical trial carried out in five hospitals in the United Kingdom evaluated women with singleton, vertex fetuses of 36 weeks of gestation or greater during labor. Continuous central fetal monitoring by computer analysis and online alerts (experimental arm) was compared with visual analysis (control arm). Fetal blood sampling and electrocardiographic ST waveform analysis were available in both arms. The primary outcome was incidence of newborn metabolic acidosis (pH less than 7.05 and base deficit greater than 12 mmol/L). Prespecified secondary outcomes included operative delivery, use of fetal blood sampling, low 5-minute Apgar score, neonatal intensive care unit admission, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, and perinatal death. A sample size of 3,660 per group (N=7,320) was planned to be able to detect a reduction in the rate of metabolic acidosis from 2.8% to 1.8% (two-tailed α of 0.05 with 80% power). RESULTS From August 2011 through July 2014, 32,306 women were assessed for eligibility and 7,730 were randomized: 3,961 to computer analysis and online alerts, and 3,769 to visual analysis. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Metabolic acidosis occurred in 16 participants (0.40%) in the experimental arm and 22 participants (0.58%) in the control arm (relative risk 0.69 [0.36-1.31]). No statistically significant differences were found in the incidence of secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION Compared with visual analysis, computer analysis of fetal monitoring signals with real-time alerts did not significantly reduce the rate of metabolic acidosis or obstetric intervention. A lower-than-expected rate of newborn metabolic acidosis was observed in both arms of the trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Registry, http://www.isrctn.com, ISRCTN42314164.

[1]  A Costa-Pereira,et al.  Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[2]  João Bernardes,et al.  A randomised clinical trial of intrapartum fetal monitoring with computer analysis and alerts versus previously available monitoring , 2010, BMC pregnancy and childbirth.

[3]  Declan Devane,et al.  Expert systems for fetal assessment in labour , 2015 .

[4]  A Ugwumadu,et al.  Author response to: Review of the first 1502 cases of ECG‐ST waveform analysis during labour in a teaching hospital , 2007, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[5]  J. Neilson Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[6]  Diogo Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  Prediction of neonatal acidemia by computer analysis of fetal heart rate and ST event signals. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  Z. Alfirevic,et al.  Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[8]  D. Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Physiology of fetal oxygenation and the main goals of intrapartum fetal monitoring , 2015, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[9]  J. Dungan,et al.  Cardiotocography Plus ST Analysis of Fetal Electrocardiogram Compared With Cardiotocography Only for Intrapartum Monitoring: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2011 .

[10]  G. Saade,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Intrapartum Fetal ECG ST-Segment Analysis , 2015 .

[11]  L. Locock,et al.  Electronic fetal monitoring during labour and anxiety levels in women taking part in a RCT , 2013 .

[12]  K. Rosen,et al.  How to assess fetal metabolic acidosis front cord samples , 1991, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[13]  Tiina Luukkaala,et al.  Intrapartum cardiotocography – the dilemma of interpretational variation , 2006, Journal of Perinatal Medicine.

[14]  K. Maršál,et al.  Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial , 2001, The Lancet.

[15]  J. Lutomski,et al.  Quantitative cardiotocography to improve fetal assessment during labor: a preliminary randomized controlled trial. , 2016, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[16]  João Bernardes,et al.  Comparison of a computer system evaluation of intrapartum cardiotocographic events and a consensus of clinicians , 2010, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[17]  J. Westgate,et al.  Umbilical cord blood gas analysis at delivery: a time for quality data , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[18]  Diogo Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  Omniview-SisPorto 3.5 - a central fetal monitoring station with online alerts based on computerized cardiotocogram+ST event analysis. , 2008, Journal of perinatal medicine.