Trial and intertrial durations in appetitive conditioning in rats

The effects of trial (T) and intertrial (I) durations were examined in two Pavlovian conditioning experiments with rats, in which a noise conditioned stimulus (CS) was paired with food delivery. In Experiment 1,T was either 10 or 20 sec, andI ranged from 15 to 960 sec, in separate groups of rats. The acquisition rate and final level of conditioned responding showed ratio invariance: They were better predicted by theI/T ratio than byI orT alone. In Experiment 2, theI/T ratio was 6.0 in all the groups, andT was 20, 40, 80, or 160 sec. Ratio invariance was not observed: Despite the commonI/T ratio, the rate of acquisition, final level of conditioned responding, and the ability of the CS to block conditioning of another stimulus differed among the groups. At the same time, the temporal distribution of conditioned responding withinT was similar in all the groups throughout conditioning and extinction and showed superpositioning when normalized acrossT. Many but not all aspects of the data were consistent with scalar timing theory.

[1]  M. Jones.  The Elimination of Children's Fears. , 1924 .

[2]  L. E. Ross,et al.  Conditioned fear as a function of CS-UCS and probe stimulus intervals. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  I. Gormezano,et al.  CONDITIONING OF THE NICTITATING MEMBRANE OF THE RABBIT AS A FUNCTION OF CS-US INTERVAL. , 1964, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[4]  E. Capaldi.  A Sequential Hypothesis of Instrumental Learning1 , 1967 .

[5]  I. Martin,et al.  Shape of the conditioned eyelid response. , 1968, Psychological review.

[6]  M. C. Smith,et al.  CS-US interval and US intensity in classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response. , 1968, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[7]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[8]  R. Solomon,et al.  An opponent-process theory of motivation. I. Temporal dynamics of affect. , 1974, Psychological review.

[9]  P. Killeen.  On the temporal control of behavior. , 1975 .

[10]  P. Holland.  Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the form of the Pavlovian conditioned response. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[11]  H. Terrace,et al.  Trial and intertrial durations in autoshaping. , 1977 .

[12]  J. Gibbon.  Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. , 1977 .

[13]  P. Holland.  CS-US interval as a determinant of the form of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responses. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[14]  P. Balsam,et al.  Rapid contextual conditioning in autoshaping. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[15]  P. Kraemer,et al.  Some observations of the effects of intertrial interval and delay on delayed matching to sample in pigeons. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[16]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Conditioning And Associative Learning , 1983 .

[17]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Role of context in autoshaping. , 1984 .

[18]  A. R. Wagner,et al.  Distribution-of-Trials Effects in Pavlovian Conditioning: An Apparent Involvement of Inhibitory Backward Conditioning With Short Intertrial Intervals , 1985 .

[19]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. , 1988 .

[20]  M. Spetch,et al.  Pigeons’ memory for event duration: Intertrial interval and delay effects , 1989 .

[21]  R. Church,et al.  Representation of time , 1990, Cognition.

[22]  C. Gallistel.  The organization of learning , 1990 .

[23]  Benjamin Rusak,et al.  Temporal context effects in pigeons' memory for event duration , 1992 .

[24]  R. R. Miller,et al.  Temporal encoding as a determinant of blocking. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[25]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  The Role of Time in Elementary Associations , 1993 .

[26]  M. Papini,et al.  Response Competition and the Trial-Spacing Effect in Autoshaping with Rats , 1994 .

[27]  P. Holland.  The effects of intertrial and feature-target intervals on operant serial feature-positive discrimination learning , 1995 .

[28]  Javier R. Morell,et al.  The Effects of Intertrial and Feature–Target Intervals on Operant Serial Feature Negative Discrimination Learning , 1996 .

[29]  R. C. Honey.  The temporal dynamics of a visual discrimination: The role of stimulus comparison and opponent processes , 1996 .

[30]  B. L. Brown,et al.  Timing of the CS-US Interval by Pigeons in Trace and Delay Autoshaping , 1997 .

[31]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Temporal integration in second-order conditioning and sensory preconditioning , 1997 .

[32]  John D. E. Gabrieli,et al.  Variation of the intertriai interval in human classical conditioning , 1997, Psychobiology.

[33]  Kathleen M. Silva,et al.  A Behavior Systems View of Conditioned States during Long and Short CS-US Intervals , 1997 .

[34]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Time as content in Pavlovian conditioning , 1998, Behavioural Processes.

[35]  B. Williams.  Relative Time and Delay of Reinforcement , 1998 .

[36]  N. Schmajuk,et al.  Occasion setting: a neural network approach. , 1998, Psychological review.

[37]  P. Holland,et al.  Hippocampal lesions interfere with Pavlovian negative occasion setting , 1999, Hippocampus.

[38]  K. Lattal,et al.  Trial and intertrial durations in Pavlovian conditioning: issues of learning and performance. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[39]  P. Holland.  Intertrial interval effects in pavlovian serial feature positive discriminations , 1999 .

[40]  J. Gibbon,et al.  Temporal control during maintenance and extinction of conditioned keypecking in ring doves , 1999 .

[41]  C. Buhusi,et al.  Timing in simple conditioning and occasion setting: a neural network approach , 1999, Behavioural Processes.