Automated calibration in vascular X-ray images using the accurate localization of catheter marker bands.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To develop a new automated calibration method for vessel measurements in vascular x-ray images. METHODS Radiopaque marker bands mounted equidistantly on a small catheter were acquired in vitro at five image intensifier (II) sizes in x-ray projection images. The positions of the marker centers were detected by using a Hough transform and were computed at subpixel precision by using either a novel, iterative center-of-gravity approach (CGA) or a symmetry filter. Curve-fitting procedures were used to reject false-positive marker detections and to calculate intermarker distances. The calibration factor was calculated from the true marker distance and the average of the measured distances in pixels. Results were compared statistically with a grid calibration method, which was taken as the gold standard. A simulation study was performed to assess the influence of image noise on the CGA method. RESULTS The iterative CGA method was convergent and faster than the symmetry-based technique. For four II sizes (17, 20, 25, and 31 cm), the results from the CGA method were not significantly different from the results obtained with grid calibration. For the II size of 38 cm, a significant difference (0.3% of the grid calibration factor) was found; however, this was caused by the quantification error in the image data and was not clinically relevant. In general, the performance of the CGA method improved with increasing signal-to-noise ratio. CONCLUSIONS A practical new calibration method for small catheter sizes was developed and validated for quantitative vascular arteriography.

[1]  J. J. Gerbrands,et al.  Accuracy and precision of quantitative digital coronary arteriography: observer-, short-, and medium-term variabilities. , 1993, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[2]  J. Reiber,et al.  Catheter sizes for quantitative coronary arteriography. , 1994, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[3]  PIETER M. J. VAN DER ZWET,et al.  Automated and Accurate Assessment of the Distribution, Magnitude, and Direction of Pincushion Distortion in Angiographic Images , 1995, Investigative radiology.

[4]  A. Dobs,et al.  Visual and quantitative computerized assessment of disease severity on peripheral angiograms. , 1994, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[5]  Chih-Shing Ho Precision of Digital Vision Systems , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  L Schwartz,et al.  Definition and measurement of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: implications for clinical trials. , 1993, American heart journal.

[7]  Andreas Wahle,et al.  Assessment of diffuse coronary artery disease by quantitative analysis of coronary morphology based upon 3-D reconstruction from biplane angiograms , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[8]  Rita Cucchiara,et al.  The Vector-Gradient Hough Transform , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  J Vanderschoot,et al.  Vessel diameter measurements in gadolinium contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MRA of peripheral arteries. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[10]  Josef Kittler,et al.  A survey of the hough transform , 1988, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[11]  Michael Egmont-Petersen,et al.  Recognition of radiopaque markers in X-ray images using a neural network as nonlinear filter , 1999, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[12]  E. Bolson,et al.  Quantitative Coronary Arteriography: Estimation of Dimensions, Hemodynamic Resistance, and Atheroma Mass of Coronary Artery Lesions Using the Arteriogram and Digital Computation , 1977, Circulation.