Responses of PROP taster groups to variations in sensory qualities within foods and beverages

Despite increasing evidence that variations in sensitivity to the bitterness of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) are also reflected in responses to other tastes in solution, there has been little research examining the impact of PROP sensitivity on responses to sensory qualities in foods or beverages. The present studies examined responses of PROP taster groups to systematic variations in tastes and oral irritation in different foods and beverages. In Experiment 1, PROP groups were asked to discriminate variations in bitterness, sweetness, or sourness within two foods (yogurt and cream cheese) and a beverage (orange juice). In most cases, tasters and especially supertasters (STs) were able to discriminate smaller variations in tastant concentration than PROP nontasters (NTs). Differences were most evident with variations in bitterness and sourness. In Experiment 2, PROP taster groups rated the sweetness, sourness, and oral irritation in carbonated fruit drinks that systematically varied in citric acid (CA) and CO2 concentrations. Ratings of sourness and irritation were highest for STs and lowest for NTs, although there were no group differences for sweetness ratings. These data are some of the first to show PROP taster group differences in tastes and irritation within foods and provide a basis for reported differences of PROP groups in their hedonic responses to foods.

[1]  J. Prescott,et al.  Incidental learning and memory for three basic tastes in food. , 2004, Chemical senses.

[2]  W. C. Kvaraceus,et al.  Principles and Practices , 2006 .

[3]  Morten Meilgaard,et al.  Sensory Evaluation Techniques , 2020 .

[4]  H. Macfie,et al.  DESIGNS TO BALANCE THE EFFECT OF ORDER OF PRESENTATION AND FIRST-ORDER CARRY-OVER EFFECTS IN HALL TESTS , 1989 .

[5]  I. J. Miller,et al.  Variations in human taste bud density and taste intensity perception , 1990, Physiology & Behavior.

[6]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices , 1998 .

[7]  E. Leach,et al.  Comparison of bitterness of caffeine and quinine by a time – intensity procedure , 1986 .

[8]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Sensory Evaluation of Food , 1999 .

[9]  A. Calviño,et al.  Interactions between Co2 Oral Pungency and Taste , 1987, Perception.

[10]  Elizabeth Matisoo-Smith,et al.  Taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil predicts acceptance of bitter-tasting spinach in 3-6-y-old children. , 2002, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[11]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Taste responses to naringin, a flavonoid, and the acceptance of grapefruit juice are related to genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil. , 1997, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[12]  D. Smith,et al.  Taste intensity as a function of area and concentration: differentiation between compounds. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  J. Prescott,et al.  Genetic variation in taste sensitivity. , 2004 .

[14]  G. Gescheider.  Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[15]  E. Glanville,et al.  Food Preference and Sensitivity of Taste for Bitter Compounds , 1965, Nature.

[16]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  PTC taste blindness and the taste of caffeine , 1975, Nature.

[17]  R. Stevenson,et al.  Pungency in food perception and preference , 1995 .

[18]  B. Tepper.  6-n-Propylthiouracil as a Genetic Taste Marker for Fat Intake, Obesity, and Chronic Disease Risk , 2004 .

[19]  I. Wakeling,et al.  Binary taste mixture interactions in prop non-tasters, medium-tasters and super-tasters. , 2001, Chemical senses.

[20]  H. Weingarten,et al.  Facial expressions and genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil predict hedonic response to sweet , 1992, Physiology & Behavior.

[21]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Young women's food preferences and taste responsiveness to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) , 2000, Physiology & Behavior.

[22]  V. Duffy,et al.  PROP (6‐n‐Propylthiouracil) Supertasters and the Saltiness of NaCl a , 1998, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  L. Bartoshuk,et al.  Bitter taste of saccharin related to the genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil. , 1979, Science.

[24]  David J. Mela.  Bitter taste intensity: the effect of tastant and thiourea taster status , 1989 .

[25]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and hedonic responses to bitter and sweet tastes. , 1997, Chemical senses.

[26]  C. Hawkes.  THE NEUROBIOLOGY OF TASTE AND SMELL. 2nd edition. , 2001 .

[27]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Genetic Sensitivity to 6-n-Propylthiouracil and Sensory Responses to Sugar and Fat Mixtures , 1998, Physiology & Behavior.

[28]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Carbonation Interactions with Sweetness and Sourness , 1992 .

[29]  J. Prescott,et al.  PSYCHOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF MECHANICAL ORAL IRRITATION , 2003 .

[30]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Taste and food preferences as predictors of dietary practices in young women , 1999, Public Health Nutrition.

[31]  J. Prescott,et al.  Responses to repeated oral irritation by capsaicin, cinnamaldehyde and ethanol in PROP tasters and non-tasters. , 2000, Chemical Sensors.

[32]  A. Farbman,et al.  Quantitative analyses of the fiber population in rat chorda tympani nerves and fungiform papillae. , 1978, The American journal of anatomy.

[33]  Francis McGlone,et al.  Lingual tactile acuity, taste perception, and the density and diameter of fungiform papillae in female subjects , 2003, Physiology & Behavior.

[34]  B. Tepper,et al.  A Current Perspective on Creaminess Perception and 6-n-Propylthiouracil Taster Status , 2004 .

[35]  T. Finger,et al.  Neurobiology of taste and smell , 1987 .

[36]  B. Green,et al.  Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ratio properties , 1993 .

[37]  Linda M. Bartoshuk,et al.  Sweetness of sucrose, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone, and saccharin is related to genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil , 1983 .

[38]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  Bitterness of KCl and benzoate: Related to genetic status for sensitivity to PTC/PROP. , 1988 .

[39]  B. Tepper,et al.  Fat Perception is Related to PROP Taster Status , 1997, Physiology & Behavior.

[40]  J. Guinard,et al.  Relation between PROP taster status and fat perception, touch, and olfaction , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[41]  G. Pickering,et al.  Intensity of taste and astringency sensations elicited by red wines is associated with sensitivity to PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) , 2004 .

[42]  L. Bartoshuk,et al.  Children's food preferences and genetic sensitivity to the bitter taste of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP). , 1991, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[43]  P. Moore,et al.  Factors affecting the sensitivity of the lingual trigeminal nerve to acids. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.

[44]  R. Fischer,et al.  Taste Thresholds and Food Dislikes , 1961, Nature.

[45]  B. Green,et al.  Sensory irritation and taste produced by NaCl and citric acid: effects of capsaicin desensitization , 1993 .

[46]  Beverly J. Tepper,et al.  Development of brief methods to classify individuals by PROP taster status , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.