The Matthew effect in environmental science publication: A bibliometric analysis of chemical substances in journal articles

[1]  N. Gilbert.  Data gaps threaten chemical safety law , 2011, Nature.

[2]  Derek R. Smith.  A 30-Year Citation Analysis of Bibliometric Trends at the Archives of Environmental Health, 1975–2004 , 2009, Archives of environmental & occupational health.

[3]  Michael P. Wilson,et al.  Green Chemistry: Wilson and Schwarzman Respond , 2009, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[4]  Michael P. Wilson,et al.  Toward a New U.S. Chemicals Policy: Rebuilding the Foundation to Advance New Science, Green Chemistry, and Environmental Health , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  The Matthew effect defined and tested for the 100 most prolific economists , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[7]  P. Grandjean.  Seven Deadly Sins of Environmental Epidemiology and the Virtues of Precaution , 2008, Epidemiology.

[8]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Concentration of the Most-Cited Papers in the Scientific Literature: Analysis of Journal Ecosystems , 2006, PloS one.

[9]  W. Klein,et al.  Bibliometrics , 2005, Social work in health care.

[10]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[11]  S. Tarkowski.  Environmental health research in Europe: bibliometric analysis. , 2007, European journal of public health.

[12]  J. Farman,et al.  Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896-2000 , 2002 .

[13]  D. Mebs,et al.  Toxicity Testing. Strategies to Determine Needs and Priorities: U.S. National Toxicology Program. 382 pp. Washington, DC: National Academy Press (1984) , 1987 .