Computation identifies structural features that govern neuronal firing properties in slowly adapting touch receptors

Touch is encoded by cutaneous sensory neurons with diverse morphologies and physiological outputs. How neuronal architecture influences response properties is unknown. To elucidate the origin of firing patterns in branched mechanoreceptors, we combined neuroanatomy, electrophysiology and computation to analyze mouse slowly adapting type I (SAI) afferents. These vertebrate touch receptors, which innervate Merkel cells, encode shape and texture. SAI afferents displayed a high degree of variability in touch-evoked firing and peripheral anatomy. The functional consequence of differences in anatomical architecture was tested by constructing network models representing sequential steps of mechanosensory encoding: skin displacement at touch receptors, mechanotransduction and action-potential initiation. A systematic survey of arbor configurations predicted that the arrangement of mechanotransduction sites at heminodes is a key structural feature that accounts in part for an afferent’s firing properties. These findings identify an anatomical correlate and plausible mechanism to explain the driver effect first described by Adrian and Zotterman. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01488.001

[1]  G. J. Gerling,et al.  The regularity of sustained firing reveals two populations of slowly adapting touch receptors in mouse hairy skin. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  R. Johansson,et al.  First spikes in ensembles of human tactile afferents code complex spatial fingertip events , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Seung-Hyun Woo,et al.  Identification of epidermal progenitors for the Merkel cell lineage , 2010, Development.

[4]  A. R. Muir,et al.  The structure and function of a slowly adapting touch corpuscle in hairy skin , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  G. Baranauskas,et al.  Spatial mismatch between the Na+ flux and spike initiation in axon initial segment , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Peter Jonas,et al.  Presynaptic Action Potential Amplification by Voltage-Gated Na+ Channels in Hippocampal Mossy Fiber Boutons , 2005, Neuron.

[7]  E. Adrian,et al.  The impulses produced by sensory nerve endings , 1926, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  Satomi Ebara,et al.  Three-dimensional analyses of touch domes in the hairy skin of the cat paw reveal morphological substrates for complex sensory processing , 2008, Neuroscience Research.

[9]  A W Goodwin,et al.  Effects of Nonuniform Fiber Sensitivity, Innervation Geometry, and Noise on Information Relayed by a Population of Slowly Adapting Type I Primary Afferents from the Fingerpad , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Ernst Niebur,et al.  A simple model of mechanotransduction in primate glabrous skin. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Representation of curved surfaces in responses of mechanoreceptive afferent fibers innervating the monkey's fingerpad , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  N. Segil,et al.  Math1-driven GFP expression in the developing nervous system of transgenic mice. , 2003, Gene expression patterns : GEP.

[13]  F. Watt,et al.  Sox2 modulates the function of two distinct cell lineages in mouse skin☆ , 2013, Developmental biology.

[14]  E. Adrian,et al.  The impulses produced by sensory nerve‐endings , 1926 .

[15]  H. Koerber,et al.  Central and peripheral anatomy of slowly adapting type I low‐threshold mechanoreceptors innervating trunk skin of neonatal mice , 2007, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  Gary R Lewin,et al.  Developmental waves of mechanosensitivity acquisition in sensory neuron subtypes during embryonic development , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[17]  D. Tapper,et al.  Integration of impulse activity in a peripheral sensory unit. , 1966, Experimental neurology.

[18]  A. Freeman,et al.  Cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey: temporal discharge patterns evoked by vibration, and a receptor model , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  Seung-Hyun Woo,et al.  The touch dome defines an epidermal niche specialized for mechanosensory signaling. , 2013, Cell reports.

[20]  D. Tobin,et al.  Hair-cycle-associated remodeling of the peptidergic innervation of murine skin, and hair growth modulation by neuropeptides. , 2001, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[21]  G. J. Gerling,et al.  A multi-timescale adaptive threshold model for the SAI tactile afferent to predict response to mechanical vibration , 2011, 2011 5th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[22]  Bassem A. Hassan,et al.  Epidermal progenitors give rise to Merkel cells during embryonic development and adult homeostasis , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  D. Ottoson,et al.  The site of impulse initiation in a nerve cell of a crustacean stretch receptor , 1958, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  M. Fitzgerald,et al.  Innervation of the tylotrich-touch dome complexes in rat skin: changing patterns during postnatal development. , 1994, Journal of anatomy.

[25]  Gregory J. Gerling,et al.  Hyperelastic Material Properties of Mouse Skin under Compression , 2013, PloS one.

[26]  E. Adrian,et al.  The impulses produced by sensory nerve-endings: Part II. The response of a Single End-Organ. , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  Gregory J. Gerling,et al.  Merkel Cells Are Essential for Light-Touch Responses , 2009, Science.

[28]  A. Christiano,et al.  Biology and genetics of hair. , 2010, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[29]  S. Dib-Hajj,et al.  Nav1.6 channels generate resurgent sodium currents in spinal sensory neurons , 2005, FEBS letters.

[30]  M. Holmes,et al.  Axonal domains within shared touch domes in the rat: A comparison of their fate during conditions favoring collateral sprouting and following axonal regeneration , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[31]  A. Freeman,et al.  A model accounting for effects of vibratory amplitude on responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  Werner R. Loewenstein,et al.  THE SITES FOR MECHANO-ELECTRIC CONVERSION IN A PACINIAN CORPUSCLE , 1958, The Journal of general physiology.

[33]  D P Corey,et al.  Adaptation of mechanoelectrical transduction in hair cells of the bullfrog's sacculus , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[34]  D. Tapper,et al.  Stimulus-response relationships in the cutaneous slowly-adapting mechanoreceptor in hairy skin of the cat. , 1965, Experimental neurology.

[35]  R. Purple,et al.  Afferent fibers with multiple encoding sites. , 1974, Brain research.

[36]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[37]  T. Yoshioka,et al.  Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture perception. , 1992, Annual review of neuroscience.

[38]  Vernon B. Mountcastle,et al.  The Neural Transformation of Mechanical Stimuli Delivered to the Monkey's Hand , 2008 .

[39]  C. Zuker,et al.  A Drosophila mechanosensory transduction channel. , 2000, Science.

[40]  K W Horch,et al.  Impulse generation in type I cutaneous mechanoreceptors. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  S. Dib-Hajj,et al.  Distinct repriming and closed‐state inactivation kinetics of Nav1.6 and Nav1.7 sodium channels in mouse spinal sensory neurons , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  E. Tschachler,et al.  The touch dome in human skin is supplied by different types of nerve fibers , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[43]  Jason C. Cohen,et al.  Under which conditions do the skin and probe decouple during sinusoidal vibrations? , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  Tactile spatial resolution. II. Neural representation of Bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  A. Goodwin,et al.  How is tactile information affected by parameters of the population such as non-uniform fiber sensitivity, innervation geometry and response variability? , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[46]  D. Cain,et al.  Response properties of mechanoreceptors and nociceptors in mouse glabrous skin: an in vivo study. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  Balasundar I Raju,et al.  3-D finite-element models of human and monkey fingertips to investigate the mechanics of tactile sense. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[48]  Y. Fukami.  Interaction of impulse activities originating from individual Golgi tendon organs innervated by branches of a single axon. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[49]  Christopher M. Taylor,et al.  Paranodal transverse bands are required for maintenance but not initiation of Nav1.6 sodium channel clustering in CNS optic nerve axons , 2003, Glia.

[50]  Arun P Sripati,et al.  Predicting the timing of spikes evoked by tactile stimulation of the hand. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  Sung Soo Kim,et al.  Conveying Tactile Feedback in Sensorized Hand Neuroprostheses Using a Biofidelic Model of Mechanotransduction , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[52]  J. Caldwell,et al.  Sodium channel Na(v)1.6 is localized at nodes of ranvier, dendrites, and synapses. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  R. E. Poppele,et al.  Anatomical evidence for multiple sources of action potentials in the afferent fibers of muscle spindles , 1980, Neuroscience.

[54]  M. Chalfie.  Neurosensory mechanotransduction , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[55]  A B Vallbo,et al.  Receptive field characteristics of tactile units with myelinated afferents in hairy skin of human subjects. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[56]  G. J. Gerling,et al.  Predicting SA-I mechanoreceptor spike times with a skin-neuron model. , 2009, Mathematical biosciences.

[57]  E Otten,et al.  Pacemaker activity in a sensory ending with multiple encoding sites: the cat muscle spindle primary ending. , 1997, The Journal of physiology.

[58]  Wenqin Luo,et al.  The Functional Organization of Cutaneous Low-Threshold Mechanosensory Neurons , 2011, Cell.

[59]  E. Adrian,et al.  The impulses produced by sensory nerve endings , 1926, The Journal of physiology.

[60]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[61]  J. Phillips,et al.  Responses of human mechanoreceptive afferents to embossed dot arrays scanned across fingerpad skin , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[62]  R. Meyer,et al.  Electrophysiological assessment of the cutaneous arborization of Adelta-fiber nociceptors. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[63]  S. Waxman,et al.  Sodium channel Na(v)1.6 is expressed along nonmyelinated axons and it contributes to conduction. , 2002, Brain research. Molecular brain research.

[64]  B. Matthews.  The response of a single end organ , 1931, The Journal of physiology.

[65]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Encoding of object curvature by tactile afferents from human fingers. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[66]  K O Johnson,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial tactile discrimination: neural patterns evoked by braille‐like dot patterns in the monkey. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[67]  J. Nathans,et al.  Morphologic diversity of cutaneous sensory afferents revealed by genetically directed sparse labeling , 2012, eLife.