Laboratory Validation of Inertial Body Sensors to Detect Cigarette Smoking Arm Movements

Cigarette smoking remains the leading cause of preventable death in the United States. Traditional in-clinic cessation interventions may fail to intervene and interrupt the rapid progression to relapse that typically occurs following a quit attempt. The ability to detect actual smoking behavior in real-time is a measurement challenge for health behavior research and intervention. The successful detection of real-time smoking through mobile health (mHealth) methodology has substantial implications for developing highly efficacious treatment interventions. The current study was aimed at further developing and testing the ability of inertial sensors to detect cigarette smoking arm movements among smokers. The current study involved four smokers who smoked six cigarettes each in a laboratory-based assessment. Participants were outfitted with four inertial body movement sensors on the arms, which were used to detect smoking events at two levels: the puff level and the cigarette level. Two different algorithms (Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Edge-Detection based learning) were trained to detect the features of arm movement sequences transmitted by the sensors that corresponded with each level. The results showed that performance of the SVM algorithm at the cigarette level exceeded detection at the individual puff level, with low rates of false positive puff detection. The current study is the second in a line of programmatic research demonstrating the proof-of-concept for sensor-based tracking of smoking, based on movements of the arm and wrist. This study demonstrates efficacy in a real-world clinical inpatient setting and is the first to provide a detection rate against direct observation, enabling calculation of true and false positive rates. The study results indicate that the approach performs very well with some participants, whereas some challenges remain with participants who generate more frequent non-smoking movements near the face. Future work may allow for tracking smoking in real-world environments, which would facilitate developing more effective, just-in-time smoking cessation interventions.

[1]  John Paul Varkey,et al.  Human motion recognition using a wireless sensor-based wearable system , 2012, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[2]  OpitzDavid,et al.  Popular ensemble methods , 1999 .

[3]  S Shiffman,et al.  Remember that? A comparison of real-time versus retrospective recall of smoking lapses. , 1997, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[4]  Jouko Tuomisto,et al.  Puffing behavior during the smoking of a single cigarette in a naturalistic environment , 1992, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[5]  S S Smith,et al.  Predicting smoking cessation. Who will quit with and without the nicotine patch. , 1994, JAMA.

[6]  Edward Sazonov,et al.  Identification of cigarette smoke inhalations from wearable sensor data using a Support Vector Machine classifier , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  Edward Sazonov,et al.  RF hand gesture sensor for monitoring of cigarette smoking , 2011, 2011 Fifth International Conference on Sensing Technology.

[8]  J. Muscat,et al.  Gender differences relative to smoking behavior and emissions of toxins from mainstream cigarette smoke. , 2007, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[9]  S. Hall,et al.  Extended treatment of older cigarette smokers. , 2009, Addiction.

[10]  T. Little The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods in Psychology, Vol. 1 , 2013 .

[11]  Kent Larson,et al.  Activity Recognition in the Home Using Simple and Ubiquitous Sensors , 2004, Pervasive.

[12]  E. Gilpin,et al.  Duration of smoking abstinence and success in quitting. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  L. Tanoue,et al.  A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation , 2010 .

[14]  Kristof Van Laerhoven,et al.  Spine versus porcupine: a study in distributed wearable activity recognition , 2004, Eighth International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[15]  Ling Bao,et al.  Activity Recognition from User-Annotated Acceleration Data , 2004, Pervasive.

[16]  K. Stevens,et al.  Cigarette smoking: Evidence to guide measurement. , 2004, Research in nursing & health.

[17]  Misha Pavel,et al.  Mobile Health: Revolutionizing Healthcare Through Transdisciplinary Research , 2013, Computer.

[18]  Syed Monowar Hossain,et al.  mPuff: Automated detection of cigarette smoking puffs from respiration measurements , 2012, 2012 ACM/IEEE 11th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN).

[19]  T. Baker,et al.  Postcessation cigarette use: the process of relapse. , 1990, Addictive behaviors.

[20]  T. Brandon,et al.  The increasing recalcitrance of smokers in clinical trials II: Pharmacotherapy trials. , 2003, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[21]  W. Velicer,et al.  Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation. , 2002, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[22]  L. Kozlowski,et al.  The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. , 1991, British journal of addiction.

[23]  A. Haslett Electronics , 1948 .

[24]  W F Velicer,et al.  Assessing outcome in smoking cessation studies. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Jesse Dallery,et al.  An Internet-based abstinence reinforcement treatment for cigarette smoking. , 2007, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[26]  Kevin G Volpp,et al.  A randomized, controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  A. Malarcher,et al.  Cigarette smoking among adults and trends in smoking cessation - United States, 2008. , 2009, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.