Whole-body impedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the reliability of whole-body impedance cardiography with electrodes on wrists and ankles in the measurement of cardiac output compared with the thermodilution method. DESIGN Prospective, clinical investigation. SETTING Surgical intensive care unit and operating room at a university hospital. PATIENTS Simultaneous cardiac output measurements by thermodilution and whole-body impedance cardiography were performed in 74 patients undergoing a coronary artery bypass grafting operation. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS A total of 97 triplicate, simultaneous cardiac output measurements were carried out with thermodilution and whole-body impedance cardiography: 74 measurements were conducted in patients who were awake and 23 measurements were conducted during anesthesia but before the commencement of surgery. The mean cardiac output difference (bias) between the two methods was 0.25 +/- 0.81 (SD) L/min; the limits of agreement (2 SD) were-1.37 and 1.87 L/min, respectively. The repeatability value (rv = 2.83 x SD) for whole-body impedance cardiography (rv = 0.46 L/min) was considerably better than for the thermodilution method (rv = 1.05 L/min). Whole-body impedance cardiography reliably detected cardiac output changes induced by head-up tilt before anesthesia, by anesthesia induction, and by intubation. Two factors predicted the between-methods stroke volume difference: hematocrit (correlation coefficient r = -.36, r2 = .13; p < .001); and body mass index (r = .29, r2 = .08; p < .01). Using the multiple linear regression equation for correcting the stroke volume by hematocrit and body mass index, the limits of agreement (2 SD) between the methods studied were reduced to +/-1.28 L/min for cardiac output and +/-0.72 L/min/m2 for cardiac index. CONCLUSIONS There was close agreement between whole-body impedance cardiography and thermodilution in the measurement of cardiac output in patients with coronary artery disease without cardiac shunts and valvular lesions. The repeatability of the impedance method was significantly better than the repeatability of thermodilution. Whole-body impedance cardiography can be recommended for the assessment of cardiac output and its changes in the resting state. Whole-body impedance cardiography is a feasible and handy method for noninvasive and continuous measurement of cardiac output.

[1]  A. Demain,et al.  Cardiac output measurement: lack of agreement between thermodilution and thoracic electric bioimpedance in two clinical settings. , 1995, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[2]  H C Lukaski,et al.  Validation of tetrapolar bioelectrical impedance method to assess human body composition. , 1986, Journal of applied physiology.

[3]  A. Perrino,et al.  Intraoperative cardiac output monitoring: comparison of impedance cardiography and thermodilution. , 1994, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[4]  R. Smith,et al.  Continuous thermodilution cardiac output: agreement with Fick and bolus thermodilution methods. , 1995, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[5]  L. Hillis,et al.  Underestimation of cardiac output by thermodilution in patients with tricuspid regurgitation. , 1989, The American journal of medicine.

[6]  W S Sageman,et al.  Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output in postaortocoronary bypass patients , 1993, Critical care medicine.

[7]  K. Espersen,et al.  Comparison of cardiac output measurement techniques: thermodilution, Doppler, GO2‐rebreathing and the direct Fick method , 1995, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[8]  J. C. Buell,et al.  Validity of cardiac output measurement by computer-averaged impedance cardiography, and comparison with simultaneous thermodilution determinations. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  K. Teo,et al.  A review of impedance cardiography. , 1995, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[10]  W. Granger,et al.  Comparison of cardiac output measurements by thermodilution and thoracic electrical bioimpedance in critically ill versus non-critically ill patients. , 1995, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[11]  T. Raffin,et al.  Thermodilution cardiac output measurement. Effects of the respiratory cycle on its reproducibility. , 1985, JAMA.

[12]  J. MacKenzie,et al.  Method of assessing the reproducibility of blood flow measurement: factors influencing the performance of thermodilution cardiac output computers. , 1986, British heart journal.

[13]  C. Jakobsen,et al.  Continuous cardiac output measurements in the perioperative period , 1995, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[14]  C. K. Mahutte,et al.  Oxygen Fick and modified carbon dioxide Fick cardiac outputs , 1994, Critical care medicine.

[15]  D P Bernstein,et al.  A new stroke volume equation for thoracic electrical bioimpedance: Theory and rationale , 1986, Critical care medicine.

[16]  M. Morton,et al.  Indicator amount, temperature, and intrinsic cardiac output affect thermodilution cardiac output accuracy and reproducibility , 1993, Critical care medicine.

[17]  L. Jensen,et al.  Evaluation of impedance cardiography: comparison of NCCOM3-R7 with Fick and thermodilution methods. , 1995, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[18]  C. Hsia,et al.  Cardiac output during exercise measured by acetylene rebreathing, thermodilution, and Fick techniques. , 1995, Journal of applied physiology.

[19]  H. Fuller.  The validity of cardiac output measurement by thoracic impedance: a meta-analysis. , 1992, Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale.

[20]  J. Mehlsen,et al.  Reliability of impedance cardiography in measuring central haemodynamics. , 1991, Clinical physiology.

[21]  K. Dracup,et al.  Predictors of between-method differences in cardiac output measurement using thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution. , 1995, Critical care medicine.

[22]  S. White,et al.  Thoracic resistivity for stroke volume calculation in impedance cardiography. , 1981, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.