Processing pitch in a nonhuman mammal (Chinchilla laniger).

Whether the mechanisms giving rise to pitch reflect spectral or temporal processing has long been debated. Generally, sounds having strong harmonic structures in their spectra have strong periodicities in their temporal structures. We found that when a wideband harmonic tone complex is passed through a noise vocoder, the resulting sound can have a harmonic structure with a large peak-to-valley ratio, but with little or no periodicity in the temporal structure. To test the role of harmonic structure in pitch perception for a nonhuman mammal, we measured behavioral responses to noise-vocoded tone complexes in chinchillas (Chinchilla laniger) using a stimulus generalization paradigm. Chinchillas discriminated either a harmonic tone complex or an iterated rippled noise from a 1-channel vocoded version of the tone complex. When tested with vocoded versions generated with 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128 channels, responses were similar to those of the 1-channel version. Behavioral responses could not be accounted for based on harmonic peak-to-valley ratio as the acoustic cue, but could be accounted for based on temporal properties of the autocorrelation functions such as periodicity strength or the height of the first peak. The results suggest that pitch perception does not arise through spectral processing in nonhuman mammals but rather through temporal processing. The conclusion that spectral processing contributes little to pitch in nonhuman mammals may reflect broader cochlear tuning than that described in humans.

[1]  N. Guttman,et al.  Discriminability and stimulus generalization. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  N. Guttman Laws of behavior and facts of perception. , 1962 .

[3]  S. Koch The process areas, the person, and some applied fields : their place in psychology and in science , 1962 .

[4]  William C. Stebbins,et al.  Animal Psychophysics: the design and conduct of sensory experiments , 1970, Springer US.

[5]  Richard W. Malott,et al.  Perception and Stimulus Generalization , 1970 .

[6]  W. Dowling,et al.  Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  F. Wightman The pattern-transformation model of pitch. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  J. L. Goldstein An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  I. Whitfield,et al.  Perception of the missing fundamental by cats. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  F. Colavita,et al.  Periodicity pitch perception and its upper frequency limit in cats , 1976 .

[11]  R S Turner The Ohm-Seebeck dispute, Hermann von Helmholtz, and the origins of physiological acoustics. , 1977, British journal for the history of science.

[12]  W. Yost,et al.  Models of the pitch and pitch strength of ripple noise , 1979 .

[13]  Gerhard Stoll,et al.  Scaling of pitch strength , 1979, Hearing Research.

[14]  E. M. Burns,et al.  Played-again SAM: Further observations on the pitch of amplitude-modulated noise , 1981 .

[15]  J. Ohala Cross-Language Use of Pitch: An Ethological View , 1983, Phonetica.

[16]  D. Schwarz,et al.  Perception of the missing fundamental in nonhuman primates. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  J. Smurzyński,et al.  Pitch identification and discrimination for complex tones with many harmonics , 1990 .

[18]  D. D. Greenwood A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[20]  Henry E. Heffner,et al.  Behavioral hearing range of the chinchilla , 1991, Hearing Research.

[21]  S Grossberg,et al.  A spectral network model of pitch perception. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.

[23]  S. H. Hulse The Discrimination-Transfer Procedure for Studying Auditory Perception and Perceptual Invariance in Animals , 1995 .

[24]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  The relative strength of the tone and noise components in iterated rippled noise , 1996 .

[25]  W A Yost,et al.  A time domain description for the pitch strength of iterated rippled noise. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  W. Yost Pitch strength of iterated rippled noise. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Douglas A. Vakoch,et al.  Tone perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: A cross-linguistic comparison , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[28]  M. Dorman,et al.  Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  R. Meddis,et al.  A unitary model of pitch perception. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  W. Shofner,et al.  Discrimination of rippled-spectrum noise from flat-spectrum noise by chinchillas: evidence for a spectral dominance region , 1997, Hearing Research.

[31]  A. Cutler,et al.  Lexical tone in Cantonese spoken-word processing , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  A. de Cheveigné Cancellation model of pitch perception. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  F. Zeng,et al.  Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  P C Loizou,et al.  On the number of channels needed to understand speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Cynthia M. Connine,et al.  Processing Spoken Chinese: The Role of Tone Information , 1999 .

[36]  S Shamma,et al.  The case of the missing pitch templates: how harmonic templates emerge in the early auditory system. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  R. Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  R. Patterson,et al.  The temporal representation of the delay of iterated rippled noise in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the guinea‐pig , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  I. Peretz,et al.  Congenital amusia: a group study of adults afflicted with a music-specific disorder. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[40]  W. Shofner Perception of the periodicity strength of complex sounds by the chinchilla , 2002, Hearing Research.

[41]  Zachary M. Smith,et al.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception , 2002, Nature.

[42]  W. Shofner,et al.  Pitch strength and Stevens’s power law , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  Christopher A Shera,et al.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Andrew J. Oxenham,et al.  Estimates of Human Cochlear Tuning at Low Levels Using Forward and Simultaneous Masking , 2003, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[45]  Stuart Rosen,et al.  Spectral and temporal cues to pitch in noise-excited vocoder simulations of continuous-interleaved-sampling cochlear implants. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  G. Langner,et al.  Temporal and spatial coding of periodicity information in the inferior colliculus of awake chinchilla (Chinchilla laniger) , 2002, Hearing Research.

[47]  Isabelle Peretz,et al.  Congenital Amusia A Disorder of Fine-Grained Pitch Discrimination , 2002, Neuron.

[48]  Andrew J Oxenham,et al.  Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  Charles Darwin,et al.  Pitch and auditory grouping , 2005 .

[50]  M. P. Gelfer,et al.  The relative contributions of speaking fundamental frequency and formant frequencies to gender identification based on isolated vowels. , 2005, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[51]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[52]  Alberto Recio-Spinoso,et al.  Delays of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and cochlear vibrations contradict the theory of coherent reflection filtering. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  R. Fay,et al.  Pitch : neural coding and perception , 2005 .

[54]  Mario A Ruggero,et al.  Unexceptional sharpness of frequency tuning in the human cochlea. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  D. Bendor,et al.  The neuronal representation of pitch in primate auditory cortex , 2005, Nature.

[56]  Michael K. Qin,et al.  Effects of Envelope-Vocoder Processing on F0 Discrimination and Concurrent-Vowel Identification , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[57]  W. Shofner,et al.  Listening experience with iterated rippled noise alters the perception of 'pitch' strength of complex sounds in the chinchilla. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  J. Licklider,et al.  A duplex theory of pitch perception , 1951, Experientia.

[59]  W. Shofner,et al.  Pitch cue learning in chinchillas: the role of spectral region in the training stimulus. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  W. Shofner,et al.  Pitch perception in chinchillas (Chinchilla laniger): stimulus generalization using rippled noise. , 2007, Journal of comparative psychology.

[61]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[62]  Ray Meddis,et al.  A cascade autocorrelation model of pitch perception. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[63]  Valeriy Shafiro,et al.  Identification of Environmental Sounds With Varying Spectral Resolution , 2008, Ear and hearing.

[64]  W. Shofner Representation of the spectral dominance region of pitch in the steady-state temporal discharge patterns of cochlear nucleus units. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[65]  What makes a melody: The perceptual singularity of pitch sequences. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[66]  G. Klump,et al.  Frequency difference limens of pure tones and harmonics within complex stimuli in Mongolian gerbils and humans. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[67]  W. Shofner Perception of the Missing Fundamental by Chinchillas in the Presence of Low-Pass Masking Noise , 2011, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[68]  Andrew J. Oxenham,et al.  Otoacoustic Estimation of Cochlear Tuning: Validation in the Chinchilla , 2010, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[69]  A Comparative View on the Perception of Mistuning: Constraints of the Auditory Periphery , 2010 .

[70]  Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  Isoresponse Versus Isoinput Estimates of Cochlear Filter Tuning , 2011, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[71]  G. Klump,et al.  Mistuning detection and onset asynchrony in harmonic complexes in Mongolian gerbils. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[72]  Neil McLachlan,et al.  A neurocognitive model of recognition and pitch segregation. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[73]  P. Joris,et al.  Frequency selectivity in Old-World monkeys corroborates sharp cochlear tuning in humans , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[74]  R. Shi,et al.  A connectionist study on the role of pitch in infant-directed speech. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.