Dynamic and Static Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Supra-aortic Vessels at 3.0 T: Intraindividual Comparison of Gadobutrol, Gadobenate Dimeglumine, and Gadoterate Meglumine at Equimolar Dose
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] F. Zaccagna,et al. Investigation of the Longitudinal Relaxation Rate of Blood After Gadobenate Dimeglumine Administration: Sequence Optimization, Dynamic Acquisition, and Clinical Impact for Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Carotid Arteries , 2011, Investigative radiology.
[2] Safety and effectiveness of single- versus triple-dose gadodiamide injection- enhanced MR angiography of the abdomen: a phase III double-blind multicenter study. , 2001, Radiology.
[3] J. Finn,et al. 3.0 Tesla High Spatial Resolution Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography (CE-MRA) of the Pulmonary Circulation: Initial Experience With a 32-Channel Phased Array Coil Using a High Relaxivity Contrast Agent , 2007, Investigative radiology.
[4] V. Runge,et al. MR angiography of carotid artery aneurysms in a porcine model at 3 tesla: Comparison of two different macrocyclic gadolinium chelates and of dynamic and conventional techniques , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[5] F. Zaccagna,et al. High-Resolution Steady State Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Carotid Arteries: Are Intravascular Agents Necessary?: Feasibility and Preliminary Experience With Gadobenate Dimeglumine , 2009, Investigative radiology.
[6] G Schneider,et al. Does Higher Gadolinium Concentration Play a Role in the Morphologic Assessment of Brain Tumors? Results of a Multicenter Intraindividual Crossover Comparison of Gadobutrol versus Gadobenate Dimeglumine (the MERIT Study) , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.
[7] G. Schroth,et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.
[8] J Paul Finn,et al. High Spatial-Resolution CE-MRA of the Carotid Circulation With Parallel Imaging: Comparison of Image Quality Between 2 Different Acceleration Factors at 3.0 Tesla , 2006, Investigative radiology.
[9] A. Huppertz,et al. Gadobutrol, a highly concentrated MR imaging contrast agent: its physicochemical characteristics and the basis for its use in contrast-enhanced MR angiography and in perfusion imaging , 2004, European radiology.
[10] S. Schoenberg,et al. High-spatial-resolution multistation MR angiography with parallel imaging and blood pool contrast agent: initial experience. , 2006, Radiology.
[11] S. Schoenberg,et al. Effects of injection rate and dose on image quality in time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) by using 1.0M contrast agents , 2007, European Radiology.
[12] M. Essig,et al. Intraindividual Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine and Gadobutrol for Cerebral Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging at 1.5 T , 2006, Investigative radiology.
[13] K. Reddy,et al. Cardiovascular disease in non-Western countries. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.
[14] S. Schoenberg,et al. Magnetic Resonance Evaluation of Renal Artery Stenosis in a Swine Model: Performance of Low-Dose Gadobutrol Versus Gadoterate Meglumine in Comparison With Digital Subtraction Intra-Arterial Catheter Angiography , 2012, Investigative radiology.
[15] F. S. Pereles,et al. Three-Dimensional Breathhold Magnetization-Prepared TrueFISP: A Pilot Study for Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Coronary Artery Disease , 2007, Investigative radiology.
[16] Joseph Whitley. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY , 1982 .
[17] V. Ajay,et al. Global cardiovascular disease research survey. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[18] G. Scotti,et al. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading. , 2005, Radiology.
[19] J. Mintorovitch,et al. Comparison of Magnetic Properties of MRI Contrast Media Solutions at Different Magnetic Field Strengths , 2005, Investigative radiology.
[20] M. Reiser,et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: comparison of unenhanced and contrast enhanced techniques , 2011, European Radiology.
[21] R. Scotti,et al. Detection of cerebral metastases on magnetic resonance imaging: intraindividual comparison of gadobutrol with gadopentetate dimeglumine , 2009, Acta radiologica.
[22] V. Runge,et al. MR angiography of the renal arteries: intraindividual comparison of double-dose contrast enhancement at 1.5 T with standard dose at 3 T. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[23] M. Port,et al. How to Compare the Efficiency of Albumin-Bound and Nonalbumin-Bound Contrast Agents In Vivo: The Concept of Dynamic Relaxivity , 2005, Investigative radiology.
[24] S. Yusuf,et al. Emerging epidemic of cardiovascular disease in developing countries. , 1999, Circulation.
[25] J. Heverhagen,et al. Dose comparison of single‐ vs. double‐dose in contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: Intraindividual cross‐over blinded trial using Gd‐DTPA , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[26] F. Schick,et al. Relaxivity of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine (Magnevist), Gadobutrol (Gadovist), and Gadobenate Dimeglumine (MultiHance) in Human Blood Plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 Tesla , 2006, Investigative radiology.
[27] C. Claussen,et al. Low-dose, time-resolved, contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography in the assessment of the abdominal aorta and its major branches at 3 Tesla. , 2010, Academic radiology.
[28] J. Le Bas,et al. In Vivo Measurement of Gadolinium Concentration in a Rat Glioma Model by Monochromatic Quantitative Computed Tomography: Comparison Between Gadopentetate Dimeglumine and Gadobutrol , 2004, Investigative radiology.
[29] R. Felix,et al. [Phantom measurements of spatial resolution and the partial-volume-effect in computer tomography (author's transl)]. , 1978, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.
[30] E. Larsson,et al. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography , 2002, Neuroradiology.
[31] J. Heverhagen,et al. Prospective comparison of image quality and diagnostic accuracy of 0.5 molar gadobenate dimeglumine and 1.0 molar gadobutrol in contrast‐enhanced run‐off magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[32] S. Schoenberg,et al. High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Lower Extremities With a Dedicated 36-Element Matrix Coil at 3 Tesla , 2007, Investigative radiology.
[33] M. Hellmich,et al. Feasibility of Peripheral Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography at 3.0 Tesla With a Hybrid Technique: Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography , 2008, Investigative radiology.
[34] H. Thomsen. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a serious late adverse reaction to gadodiamide , 2006, European Radiology.
[35] B. Wintersperger,et al. Brain MRI with single-dose (0.1 mmol/kg) Gadobutrol at 1.5 T and 3 T: comparison with 0.15 mmol/kg Gadoterate meglumine. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[36] S. Schoenberg,et al. Measurement of signal‐to‐noise ratios in MR images: Influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[37] James C Carr,et al. Thorax: low-dose contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with subsecond temporal resolution--initial results. , 2002, Radiology.
[38] N. Anzalone. Comparative Studies of Different Gadolinium Agents in Brain Tumors: Differences between Gadolinium Chelates and Their Possible Influence on Imaging Features , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.
[39] U. Klose,et al. Intra-individual Crossover Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine and Gadopentetate Dimeglumine for Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Supraaortic Vessels at 3 Tesla , 2008, Investigative radiology.
[40] D. Hadizadeh,et al. Simultaneous MR arteriography and venography with blood pool contrast agent detects deep venous thrombosis in suspected arterial disease. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[41] M. Reiser,et al. Peripheral Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) With Continuous Table Movement at 3.0 T: Initial Experience Compared With Step-by-Step MRA , 2008, Investigative radiology.
[42] E. Merkle,et al. Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography: First-Pass Arterial Enhancement as a Function of Gadolinium-Chelate Concentration, and the Saline Chaser Volume and Injection Rate , 2012, Investigative radiology.
[43] René M. Botnar,et al. Flow Targeted 3D Steady-State Free-Precession Coronary MR Angiography: Comparison of Three Different Imaging Approaches , 2009, Investigative radiology.
[44] J. Finn,et al. Ultra-Low-Dose, Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Carotid Arteries at 3.0 Tesla , 2009, Investigative radiology.