Assessing the development of newly created habitat for wintering estuarine birds

Abstract The term coastal squeeze has been used to describe the process whereby hard flood defences in areas subjected to relative sea level rise constrain the ability of an estuarine system to respond naturally, thus leading to a loss of intertidal habitat, with an associated potential reduction in the carrying capacity of the estuarine system for fish and bird populations. The process of coastal squeeze, coupled with the long-term effects of climate change, has generated the need to create or restore intertidal habitats in estuaries. In Humber Estuary (UK) it is estimated that over 700 hectares of intertidal habitat will be lost due to coastal squeeze and rising sea levels over the next 50 years. In order to address this net loss, a process known as ‘managed realignment’ has been employed as an estuarine habitat management tool, whereby sections of flood defences are moved inland to create or restore intertidal habitat and offset potential losses in carrying capacity. On the Humber, the Paull Holme Strays site, to the east of Hull, has been the first managed realignment site on the estuary to become operational. The site at Paull Holme Strays was breached in September 2003 creating approximately 80 hectares of intertidal habitat. In order to assess the development of the waterbird assemblage at the Paull Holme Strays site, and ultimately the success of the habitat creation technique, monthly ornithological surveys were undertaken in the newly created habitat and on the mudflat fronting the managed realignment site. The analysis of avifaunal usage data at Paull Holme Strays has demonstrated that within 3 years of creation, the new intertidal habitat is capable of supporting at low water, a functional waterbird assemblage of similar composition to that of adjacent existing intertidal areas. At Paull Holme Strays, this has been achieved with little ongoing management of new habitats.

[1]  M. Leakey,et al.  Creation of Temperate-Climate Intertidal Mudflats: Factors Affecting Colonization and Use by Benthic Invertebrates and their Bird Predators , 1999 .

[2]  N. Davidson,et al.  Nature conservation and estuaries in Great Britain , 1991 .

[3]  Charles A. Simenstad,et al.  Functional Equivalency Trajectories of the Restored Gog‐Le‐Hi‐Te Estuarine Wetland , 1996 .

[4]  Setting the Research Agenda on the Costs of Rising Sea Level@@@Climatic Change, Rising Sea Level and the British Coast. , 1990 .

[5]  Daryl Burdon,et al.  The Humber Estuary: A comprehensive review of its nature conservation interest , 2003 .

[6]  J. E. Smith,et al.  Physical and biological development of a newly breached managed realignment site, Humber estuary, UK. , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[7]  P. Winn,et al.  The Humber Estuary, Eastern England: Strategic planning of flood defences and habitats. , 2006, Marine pollution bulletin.

[8]  J. T. Curtis,et al.  An Ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern Wisconsin , 1957 .

[9]  M. Elliott,et al.  Organic matter and nutrient inputs to the Humber Estuary, England. , 2006, Marine pollution bulletin.

[10]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Change in marine communities : an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation , 2001 .

[11]  A. Grant,et al.  Managed realignment in the UK – the first 5 years of colonization by birds , 2004 .

[12]  P. Winn,et al.  Planning for the rising tides: the Humber Estuary Shoreline Management Plan. , 2003, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  P. Atkinson Can we recreate or restore intertidal habitats for shorebirds , 2003 .