Koala Genome Survey: An Open Data Resource to Improve Conservation Planning

Genome sequencing is a powerful tool that can inform the management of threatened species. Koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) are a globally recognized species that captured the hearts and minds of the world during the 2019/2020 Australian megafires. In 2022, koalas were listed as ‘Endangered’ in Queensland, New South Wales, and the Australian Capital Territory. Populations have declined because of various threats such as land clearing, habitat fragmentation, and disease, all of which are exacerbated by climate change. Here, we present the Koala Genome Survey, an open data resource that was developed after the Australian megafires. A systematic review conducted in 2020 demonstrated that our understanding of genomic diversity within koala populations was scant, with only a handful of SNP studies conducted. Interrogating data showed that only 6 of 49 New South Wales areas of regional koala significance had meaningful genome-wide data, with only 7 locations in Queensland with SNP data and 4 locations in Victoria. In 2021, we launched the Koala Genome Survey to generate resequenced genomes across the Australian east coast. We have publicly released 430 koala genomes (average coverage: 32.25X, range: 11.3–66.8X) on the Amazon Web Services Open Data platform to accelerate research that can inform current and future conservation planning.

[1]  P. Timms,et al.  A targeted approach to investigating immune genes of an iconic Australian marsupial , 2022, Molecular ecology.

[2]  Yuanyuan Cheng,et al.  Restoring faith in conservation action: Maintaining wild genetic diversity through the Tasmanian devil insurance program , 2022, iScience.

[3]  Rebecca N. Johnson,et al.  Future‐proofing the koala: Synergising genomic and environmental data for effective species management , 2022, Molecular ecology.

[4]  Dalia A. Conde,et al.  The Earth BioGenome Project 2020: Starting the clock , 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  A. Wayne,et al.  Metapopulation management of a critically endangered marsupial in the age of genomics , 2021, Global Ecology and Conservation.

[6]  Fergal J. Martin,et al.  Population genomics of the critically endangered kākāpō , 2021, Cell genomics.

[7]  J. Ewen,et al.  Genomic data of different resolutions reveal consistent inbreeding estimates but contrasting homozygosity landscapes for the threatened Aotearoa New Zealand hihi , 2021, Molecular ecology.

[8]  J. Castresana,et al.  The genome of the Pyrenean desman and the effects of bottlenecks and inbreeding on the genomic landscape of an endangered species , 2021, Evolutionary applications.

[9]  L. Beheregaray,et al.  Whole genomes reveal multiple candidate genes and pathways involved in the immune response of dolphins to a highly infectious virus , 2021, Molecular ecology.

[10]  J. C. Teixeira,et al.  The inflated significance of neutral genetic diversity in conservation genetics , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  After the Megafires: What Next for Australian Wildlife? , 2020, Trends in Ecology & Evolution.

[12]  R. Cristescu,et al.  Inbreeding and disease avoidance in a free‐ranging koala population , 2020, Molecular ecology.

[13]  C. Dickman,et al.  Some personal reflections on the present and future of Australia’s fauna in an increasingly fire‐prone continent , 2020 .

[14]  R. W. Baird,et al.  Runs of homozygosity in killer whale genomes provide a global record of demographic histories , 2020, bioRxiv.

[15]  W. Funk,et al.  Population genomics for wildlife conservation and management , 2020, Molecular ecology.

[16]  E. Dong,et al.  An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[17]  J. Seddon,et al.  Koala Conservation in Queensland, Australia: A Role for Assisted Gene Flow for Genetic Rescue? , 2020 .

[18]  K. Gharbi,et al.  Benefits and pitfalls of captive conservation genetic management: Evaluating diversity in scimitar-horned oryx to support reintroduction planning , 2020, Biological Conservation.

[19]  C. Grueber,et al.  Preserving the demographic and genetic integrity of a single source population during multiple translocations , 2020 .

[20]  A. Wayne,et al.  Integrating population genetics in an adaptive management framework to inform management strategies , 2019, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[21]  Parice A. Brandies,et al.  The Value of Reference Genomes in the Conservation of Threatened Species , 2019, Genes.

[22]  J. Norman,et al.  Integrating measures of long-distance dispersal into vertebrate conservation planning: scaling relationships and parentage-based dispersal analysis in the koala , 2019, Conservation Genetics.

[23]  C. Grueber,et al.  Too much of a good thing? Finding the most informative genetic data set to answer conservation questions , 2019, Molecular ecology resources.

[24]  G. Wallis.  Thirty years of conservation genetics in New Zealand: what have we learnt? , 2019, Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand.

[25]  J. Mosse,et al.  Isolating DNA sourced non-invasively from koala scats: a comparison of four commercial DNA stool kits , 2019, Conservation Genetics Resources.

[26]  C. Grueber,et al.  Founder relationships and conservation management: empirical kinships reveal the effect on breeding programmes when founders are assumed to be unrelated , 2018, Animal Conservation.

[27]  D. Phalen,et al.  Genomic comparisons reveal biogeographic and anthropogenic impacts in the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus): a dietary-specialist species distributed across heterogeneous environments , 2018, Heredity.

[28]  B. Shapiro,et al.  Conservation of biodiversity in the genomics era , 2018, Genome Biology.

[29]  Graham J. Etherington,et al.  Adaptation and conservation insights from the koala genome , 2018, Nature Genetics.

[30]  Juan Carlos Castilla-Rubio,et al.  Earth BioGenome Project: Sequencing life for the future of life , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  R. Cristescu,et al.  Fresh is best: Accurate SNP genotyping from koala scats , 2018, Ecology and evolution.

[32]  J. Mosse,et al.  Genetic structure and diversity of the koala population in South Gippsland, Victoria: a remnant population of high conservation significance , 2018, Conservation Genetics.

[33]  Mathew S. Crowther,et al.  A review of climatic change as a determinant of the viability of koala populations , 2017, Wildlife Research.

[34]  J. Callaghan,et al.  The remaining koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) of the Pilliga forests, north-west New South Wales: refugial persistence or a population on the road to extinction? , 2017 .

[35]  Michele R. Dudash,et al.  A Practical Guide for Genetic Management of Fragmented Animal and Plant Populations , 2017 .

[36]  J. Mosse,et al.  Validating the use of non-invasively sourced DNA for population genetic studies using pedigree data , 2017 .

[37]  S. FitzGibbon,et al.  Population genetics of the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) in north-eastern New South Wales and south-eastern Queensland , 2017, Australian Journal of Zoology.

[38]  K. Helgen,et al.  Phylogeography of the Koala, (Phascolarctos cinereus), and Harmonising Data to Inform Conservation , 2016, PloS one.

[39]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  Use of expert knowledge to elicit population trends for the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) , 2016 .

[40]  J. L. Tomkins,et al.  Heritable variation in heat shock gene expression: a potential mechanism for adaptation to thermal stress in embryos of sea turtles , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  S. O’Brien,et al.  Koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) From Queensland Are Genetically Distinct From 2 Populations in Victoria. , 2016, The Journal of heredity.

[42]  D. Phalen,et al.  Genome-wide SNP loci reveal novel insights into koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) population variability across its range , 2016, Conservation Genetics.

[43]  William J. Foley,et al.  Conserving koalas: A review of the contrasting regional trends, outlooks and policy challenges , 2015 .

[44]  F. Carrick,et al.  Testing the regional genetic representativeness of captive koala populations in South-East Queensland , 2014, Wildlife Research.

[45]  D. Higgins,et al.  Identification of MHCII variants associated with chlamydial disease in the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) , 2014, PeerJ.

[46]  C. Ponting,et al.  Sequencing depth and coverage: key considerations in genomic analyses , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[47]  W. Foley,et al.  Continuous monitoring of feeding by koalas highlights diurnal differences in tree preferences , 2014, Wildlife Research.

[48]  T. Hansen,et al.  Evaluation of a target region capture sequencing platform using monogenic diabetes as a study-model , 2014, BMC Genetics.

[49]  A. Roca,et al.  Development of 14 microsatellite markers in the Queensland koala (Phascolarctos cinereus adustus) using next generation sequencing technology , 2014, Conservation Genetics Resources.

[50]  Rachael Y. Dudaniec,et al.  Using multilevel models to identify drivers of landscape‐genetic structure among management areas , 2013, Molecular ecology.

[51]  J. Mosse,et al.  Reliable genotyping of the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) using DNA isolated from a single faecal pellet , 2013, Molecular ecology resources.

[52]  A. Wayne,et al.  Genetic outcomes from the translocations of the critically endangered woylie , 2013 .

[53]  F. Carrick,et al.  Anthropogenic changes to the landscape resulted in colonization of koalas in north‐east New South Wales, Australia , 2013 .

[54]  O. Ryder,et al.  Conservation genomics of threatened animal species. , 2013, Annual review of animal biosciences.

[55]  A. Melzer,et al.  Genetic diversity in natural and introduced island populations of koalas in Queensland , 2013, Australian Journal of Zoology.

[56]  A. Roca,et al.  Historically low mitochondrial DNA diversity in koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) , 2012, BMC Genetics.

[57]  H. Hoekstra,et al.  Double Digest RADseq: An Inexpensive Method for De Novo SNP Discovery and Genotyping in Model and Non-Model Species , 2012, PloS one.

[58]  D. Phalen,et al.  Genetic Analysis reveals a distinct and highly diverse Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) population in South Gippsland, Victoria, Australia , 2012 .

[59]  C. McAlpine,et al.  Drought-driven change in wildlife distribution and numbers: a case study of koalas in south west Queensland , 2011 .

[60]  A. Kilian,et al.  Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT) and next-generation sequencing combined: genome-wide, high throughput, highly informative genotyping for molecular breeding of Eucalyptus , 2011, BMC Proceedings.

[61]  B. Koop,et al.  Identification of genes associated with heat tolerance in Arctic charr exposed to acute thermal stress. , 2011, Physiological genomics.

[62]  C. McAlpine,et al.  Ranking and mapping koala habitat quality for conservation planning on the basis of indirect evidence of tree-species use: a case study of Noosa Shire, south-eastern Queensland , 2011 .

[63]  D. Phalen,et al.  Defining spatial genetic structure and management units for vulnerable koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) populations in the Sydney region, Australia , 2010 .

[64]  F. Carrick,et al.  Genetic variation and structuring in the threatened koala populations of Southeast Queensland , 2010, Conservation Genetics.

[65]  W. Sherwin,et al.  Detecting bottlenecks using BOTTLENECK 1.2.02 in wild populations: the importance of the microsatellite structure , 2010, Conservation Genetics.

[66]  W. Forbes.  On some Points in the Anatomy of the Koala Phascolarctos cinereus , 2009 .

[67]  W. Sherwin,et al.  Inbreeding and testicular abnormalities in a bottlenecked population of koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) , 2009 .

[68]  M. Phillips,et al.  Family-level relationships among the Australasian marsupial "herbivores" (Diprotodontia: Koala, wombats, kangaroos and possums). , 2008, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[69]  D. Couvet,et al.  Integration of demography and genetics in population restorations , 2007 .

[70]  M. Hasegawa,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of diprotodontian marsupials based on complete mitochondrial genomes. , 2006, Genes & genetic systems.

[71]  A. Cowling,et al.  Eucalyptus foliar chemistry explains selective feeding by koalas , 2005, Biology Letters.

[72]  J. Bonfield,et al.  Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome , 2004, Nature.

[73]  W. Sutherland,et al.  The need for evidence-based conservation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[74]  P. Timms,et al.  Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA Variation in Populations of Eastern Australian Koalas, Phascolarctos cinereus , 1998, Biochemical Genetics.

[75]  P. Timms,et al.  DNA fingerprint analysis of a free-range koala population , 1993, Biochemical Genetics.

[76]  International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium.  Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome , 2004 .

[77]  L. Christidis,et al.  Molecular phylogenetics of the Diprotodontia (kangaroos, wombats, koala, possums, and allies). , 2002, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[78]  Chao Wang,et al.  Genetic variation in captive population of chinese alligator, Alligator sinensis, revealed by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) , 2002 .

[79]  P. Gupta,et al.  Microsatellites in plants: a new class of molecular markers , 2002 .

[80]  B. Houlden,et al.  High effective inbreeding coefficients correlate with morphological abnormalities in populations of South Australian koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) , 2001 .

[81]  R. Frankham,et al.  HOW CLOSELY CORRELATED ARE MOLECULAR AND QUANTITATIVE MEASURES OF GENETIC VARIATION? A META‐ANALYSIS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[82]  Simon Ferrier,et al.  Incorporating Habitat Mapping into Practical Koala Conservation on Private Lands , 2000 .

[83]  W. Sherwin,et al.  Analysis and Conservation Implications of Koala Genetics , 2000 .

[84]  B. Houlden,et al.  Genetic diversity and gene flow among southeastern Queensland koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[85]  B. Houlden,et al.  Phylogeographic differentiation in the mitochondrial control region in the koala, Phascolarctos cinereus (Goldfuss 1817) , 1999, Molecular ecology.

[86]  Y. Yamamoto,et al.  Genetic variation of mitochondrial cytochrome b genes among the subspecies of koala, Phascolarctos cinereus. , 1998, The Journal of veterinary medical science.

[87]  J. Callaghan,et al.  An Ecological History of Koala Habitat in Port Stephens Shire and the Lower Hunter on the Central Coast of New South Wales, 1801-1998 , 1998 .

[88]  S. Aljanabi,et al.  Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[89]  S. O’Brien,et al.  Conservation genetics of the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus): low mitochondrial DNA variation amongst southern Australian populations. , 1997, Genetical research.

[90]  D. Taggart,et al.  Informative enzyme/probe combinations for the multilocus DNA fingerprinting of marsupials , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[91]  W. Sherwin,et al.  Low genetic variability of the koala Phascolarctos cinereus in south‐eastern Australia following a severe population bottleneck , 1996, Molecular ecology.

[92]  W. Sherwin,et al.  Paternity exclusion in koalas using hypervariable microsatellites. , 1996, The Journal of heredity.

[93]  Craig Moritz,et al.  Low genetic diversity and inbreeding depression in Queensland koalas , 1993 .

[94]  P. Timms,et al.  DNA profilinf of Queensland Koalas reveals sufficient variability for individual identification and parentage determination. , 1992 .

[95]  M. Hindell,et al.  Tree Species Selection by Free-Ranging Koala Populations in Victoria. , 1985 .