A two‐stage procedure for comparing hazard rate functions

Comparison of two hazard rates is important in applications that are related to times to occurrence of a specific event. Conventional comparison procedures, such as the log-rank, Gehan-Wilcoxon and Peto-Peto tests, are powerful only when the two hazard rates do not cross each other. Because crossing hazard rates are common in practice, several procedures have been proposed in the literature for comparing such rates. However, most of these procedures consider only the alternative hypothesis with crossing hazard rates; many other realistic cases, including those when the two hazard rates run parallel to each other, are excluded from consideration. We propose a two-stage procedure that considers all possible alternatives, including ones with crossing or running parallel hazard rates. To define its significance level and "p"-value properly, a new procedure for handling the crossing hazard rates problem is suggested, which has the property that its test statistic is asymptotically independent of the test statistic of the log-rank test. We show that the two-stage procedure, with the log-rank test and the suggested procedure for handling the crossing hazard rates problem used in its two stages, performs well in applications in comparing two hazard rates. Copyright 2008 Royal Statistical Society.

[1]  J. Anderson,et al.  A Two-step Regression Model for Hazard Functions , 1982 .

[2]  Catherine Huber,et al.  Weighted log rank statistics for comparing two distributions , 1992 .

[3]  Alan Kimber,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Reliability and Life‐Testing Models: Theory and Methods , 1993 .

[4]  R. Davies Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative , 1977 .

[5]  P. Bauer,et al.  Adaptive Two Stage Designs and the Conditional Error Function , 1999 .

[6]  Jerald F. Lawless,et al.  Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data. , 1983 .

[7]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[8]  Xun Lin,et al.  A New Testing Approach for Comparing the Overall Homogeneity of Survival Curves , 2004 .

[9]  Rupert G. Miller,et al.  Survival Analysis , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[10]  W. Brannath,et al.  Recursive Combination Tests , 2002 .

[11]  M. Pagano,et al.  Survival analysis. , 1996, Nutrition.

[12]  A. V. D. Vaart,et al.  Asymptotic Statistics: Frontmatter , 1998 .

[13]  Anthony C. Davison,et al.  Bootstrap Methods and Their Application , 1998 .

[14]  D. Harrington,et al.  Counting Processes and Survival Analysis , 1991 .

[15]  John O'Quigley,et al.  On a Two‐Sided Test for Crossing Hazards , 1994 .

[16]  Gordon Johnston,et al.  Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data , 2003, Technometrics.

[17]  Lee J. Bain Statistical analysis of reliability and life-testing models : theory and methods , 1992 .

[18]  William S. Griffith Statistical Analysis of Reliability and Life Testing Models: Theory and Methods, 2nd Ed. , 1993 .

[19]  Peihua Qiu,et al.  Comparing two crossing hazard rates by Cox proportional hazards modelling , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  David P. Harrington,et al.  Modified Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Procedures with Application to Arbitrarily Right-Censored Data , 1980 .

[21]  R. Davies Hypothesis Testing when a Nuisance Parameter is Present Only Under the Alternatives , 1987 .

[22]  Nathan Mantel,et al.  The Crossing Hazard Function Problem , 1988 .

[23]  J O'Quigley,et al.  The problem of a covariate-time qualitative interaction in a survival study. , 1991, Biometrics.

[24]  L Edler,et al.  A two-sample censored-data rank test for acceleration. , 1984, Biometrics.

[25]  N Mantel,et al.  Mantel-Haenszel analyses of litter-matched time-to-response data, with modifications for recovery of interlitter information. , 1977, Cancer research.

[26]  J O'Quigley,et al.  Score tests for homogeneity of regression effect in the proportional hazards model. , 1989, Biometrics.

[27]  CONFIDENCE BANDS FOR HAZARD RATE UNDER RANDOM CENSORSHIP BY MING-YEN CHENG , 2005 .