Envy-Free Pricing in Large Markets

We study the classic setting of envy-free pricing, in which a single seller chooses prices for its many items, with the goal of maximizing revenue once the items are allocated. Despite the large body of work addressing such settings, most versions of this problem have resisted good approximation factors for maximizing revenue; this is true even for the classic unit-demand case. In this article, we study envy-free pricing with unit-demand buyers, but unlike previous work we focus on large markets: ones in which the demand of each buyer is infinitesimally small compared to the size of the overall market. We assume that the buyer valuations for the items they desire have a nice (although reasonable) structure, that is, that the aggregate buyer demand has a monotone hazard rate and that the values of every buyer type come from the same support. For such large markets, our main contribution is a 1.88-approximation algorithm for maximizing revenue, showing that good pricing schemes can be computed when the number of buyers is large. We also give a (e,2)-bicriteria algorithm that simultaneously approximates both maximum revenue and welfare, thus showing that it is possible to obtain both good revenue and welfare at the same time. We further generalize our results by relaxing some of our assumptions and quantify the necessary tradeoffs between revenue and welfare in our setting. Our results are the first known approximations for large markets and crucially rely on new lower bounds, which we prove for the revenue-maximizing prices.

[1]  Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi,et al.  Network Cournot Competition , 2014, WINE.

[2]  Paul C. Pfleiderer,et al.  A Note on the Effect of Cost Changes on Prices , 1983, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  Michal Feldman,et al.  Combinatorial Auctions via Posted Prices , 2014, SODA.

[4]  Vahab S. Mirrokni,et al.  Optimal marketing strategies over social networks , 2008, WWW.

[5]  H. Poor,et al.  Economics of Electric Vehicle Charging: A Game , 2012 .

[6]  Paul Belleflamme,et al.  Industrial Organization: Markets and Strategies , 2010 .

[7]  Koushik Kar,et al.  Envy-Free Pricing in Large Markets: Approximating Revenue and Welfare , 2015, ICALP.

[8]  E. Glen Weyl,et al.  Walrasian equilibrium in large, quasilinear markets: Walrasian equilibrium , 2013 .

[9]  Atri Rudra,et al.  Dynamic pricing for impatient bidders , 2007, SODA '07.

[10]  E. Glen Weyl,et al.  Walrasian Equilibrium in Large, Quasilinear Markets , 2012 .

[11]  Renato Paes Leme,et al.  On revenue in the generalized second price auction , 2012, WWW.

[12]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Algorithmic Game Theory , 2007 .

[13]  Stefan Reichelstein,et al.  Comparative statics of monopoly pricing , 2000, Economic Theory.

[14]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Algorithmic game theory , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[15]  Atri Rudra,et al.  Walrasian Equilibrium: Hardness, Approximations and Tractable Instances , 2005, Algorithmica.

[16]  Pinyan Lu,et al.  Envy-Free Pricing with General Supply Constraints for Unit Demand Consumers , 2012, Journal of Computer Science and Technology.

[17]  Ning Chen,et al.  On revenue maximization with sharp multi-unit demands , 2016, J. Comb. Optim..

[18]  Elliot Anshelevich,et al.  Price Competition in Networked Markets: How Do Monopolies Impact Social Welfare? , 2014, WINE.

[19]  Chaitanya Swamy,et al.  Approximation Algorithms for Single-minded Envy-free Profit-maximization Problems with Limited Supply , 2008, 2008 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[20]  Ning Chen,et al.  Envy-free pricing in multi-item markets , 2014, TALG.

[21]  D. Gale,et al.  Multi-Item Auctions , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  Venkatesan Guruswami,et al.  On profit-maximizing envy-free pricing , 2005, SODA '05.

[23]  J. George Shanthikumar,et al.  Convex separable optimization is not much harder than linear optimization , 1990, JACM.

[24]  Shuchi Chawla,et al.  Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing , 2010, BQGT.

[25]  Piotr Krysta,et al.  Buying Cheap Is Expensive: Approximability of Combinatorial Pricing Problems , 2011, SIAM J. Comput..

[26]  Sampath Kannan,et al.  Improved Hardness Results for Profit Maximization Pricing Problems with Unlimited Supply , 2012, APPROX-RANDOM.

[27]  Michal Feldman,et al.  Combinatorial walrasian equilibrium , 2013, STOC '13.

[28]  R. Adams Proceedings , 1947 .

[29]  R. Amir Cournot Oligopoly and the Theory of Supermodular Games , 1996 .

[30]  Koushik Kar,et al.  Pricing to Maximize Revenue and Welfare Simultaneously in Large Markets , 2016, WINE.

[31]  Sergei Vassilvitskii,et al.  Optimal envy-free pricing with metric substitutability , 2008, EC '08.

[32]  Hai-Jun Huang,et al.  Existence and efficiency of oligopoly equilibrium under toll and capacity competition , 2011 .

[33]  M. Bagnoli,et al.  Log-concave probability and its applications , 2004 .

[34]  Shuchi Chawla,et al.  Algorithmic pricing via virtual valuations , 2007, EC '07.

[35]  Walid Saad,et al.  Economics of Electric Vehicle Charging: A Game Theoretic Approach , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[36]  Amos Fiat,et al.  Revenue maximizing envy-free multi-unit auctions with budgets , 2012, EC '12.