The evaluation of fuzzy membership of land cover classes in the suburban zone

Abstract The reflectance values of pixels, recorded by remote sensors, are often generated by more than one ground phenomenon. This, the so-called mixed pixel problem, has always been a property of scanner-type imaging, but its effect on the image classification process is arguably still a major problem to deriving accurate land cover maps, in spite of the increasing spatial resolution of sensors. This paper explores use of a fuzzy classifier to determine the constituent land cover components of pixels in a suburban environment. The classifier derives a measure of the fuzzy membership of a pixel belonging to each land cover class. For some land cover types including water, wetland, and woodland, a high correlation is shown between the fuzzy membership values for a pixel and the portion of the area of that pixel which belongs to a particular land cover type. The correlation for other land cover types is statistically significant but qualitatively poorer, and may indicate a lack of signature purity. The results show that the fuzzy classifier may enable the extraction of information about individual pixels and about subpixel phenomena not addressed by other classifiers.

[1]  Michael J. Sabin,et al.  Convergence and Consistency of Fuzzy c-means/ISODATA Algorithms , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  J. Campbell Introduction to remote sensing , 1987 .

[3]  P. Switzer,et al.  Resolving the percentage of component terrains within single resolution elements , 1980 .

[4]  W. T. Tucker,et al.  Convergence theory for fuzzy c-means: Counterexamples and repairs , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  John R. Jensen,et al.  Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective , 1986 .

[6]  Mohan M. Trivedi,et al.  Low-Level Segmentation of Aerial Images with Fuzzy Clustering , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[7]  J. Bezdek,et al.  FCM: The fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm , 1984 .

[8]  Kanti V. Mardia,et al.  Spatial Classification Using Fuzzy Membership Models , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Darrel L. Williams,et al.  The effects of spatial resolution on the classification of Thematic Mapper data , 1985 .

[10]  P. Gong,et al.  The use of structural information for improving land-cover classification accuracies at the rural-urban fringe. , 1990 .

[11]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms , 1981, Advanced Applications in Pattern Recognition.

[12]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Efficient Implementation of the Fuzzy c-Means Clustering Algorithms , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  N. Fuhs,et al.  Evaluation of several schemes for classification of remotely sensed data , 1980 .

[14]  M. Roubens Fuzzy clustering algorithms and their cluster validity , 1982 .

[15]  Abraham Kandel,et al.  Fuzzy techniques in pattern recognition , 1982 .

[16]  Raj S. Chhikara,et al.  Effect of mixed (boundary) pixels on crop proportion estimation , 1984 .

[17]  J. R. Jensen SPECTRAL AND TEXTURAL FEATURES TO CLASSIFY ELUSIVE LAND COVER AT THE URBAN FRINGE , 1979 .

[18]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The factor of scale in remote sensing , 1987 .

[19]  Paul M. Mather,et al.  Computer Processing of Remotely-Sensed Images: An Introduction , 1988 .