Paradigms and communication

Abstract Different structures of reasoning which exist in different cultures, professions, and disciplines are called different “logical models”, “logics”, “epistemologies”, etc., depending on disciplines. For the sake of brevity they are called different “paradigms” in this paper. This paper proposes the exploration of paradigmatology and its application to cross-disciplinary, cross-professional and cross-cultural communication. The paper consists of introductory sections and three main parts. The first main part discusses three paradigms, whose differences frequently cause frustration and frictions in interdisciplinary and interprofessional work, especially in urban planning, environmental design, etc. The second part discusses existence of literature on the paradigmatic aspects of cross-cultural communication, and the theoretical and conceptual tools available for the identification and analysis of misunderstandings in cross-paradigmatic communication. It mentions paucity of literature on cross-disciplinary and cross-professional communication and on methods for improvement of cross-paradigmatic communication. Demonopolarization and transspection are proposed. Finally, transparadigmatic process as the process to create not-yet-existing paradigms is discussed.

[1]  Magoroh Maruyama BASIC ELEMENTS IN MISUNDERSTANDINGS II , 1963 .

[2]  H. Spemann Embryonic development and induction , 1938 .

[3]  Magoroh Maruyama,et al.  The Multilateral Mutual Causal Relationships among the Modes of Communication, Sociometric Pattern and the Intellectual Orientation in the Danish Culture , 1961 .

[4]  Magoroh Maruyama Paradigmatology and its Application to Cross‐Disciplinary, Cross‐Professional and Cross‐Cultural Communication , 1974 .

[5]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  Extrapolation, Interpolation, and Smoothing of Stationary Time Series , 1964 .

[6]  Magoroh Maruyama Epistemology of Social Science Research: exploration in inculture researchers , 1969 .

[7]  C. H. WADDINGTON,et al.  Towards a Theoretical Biology , 1968, Nature.

[8]  G. Bateson The cybernetics of "self": a theory of alcoholism. , 1971, Psychiatry.

[9]  R. Mirman The direction of time , 1975 .

[10]  R. Berk,et al.  Establishing Rapport with Deviant Groups , 1970 .

[11]  Magoroh Maruyama,et al.  THE SECOND CYBERNETICS Deviation-Amplifying Mutual Causal Processes , 1963 .

[12]  S. Wright Evolution in mendelian populations , 1931 .

[13]  L. Feuer The Bearing of Psychoanalysis Upon Philosophy , 1959 .

[14]  Magoroh Maruyama Non‐Classificational Information and Non‐Informational Communication* , 1972 .

[15]  H. Ellenberger A Clinical Introduction to Psychiatric Phenomenology and Existential Analysis. , 1958 .

[16]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[17]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[18]  M. Mead The application of anthropological techniques to cross-national communication. , 1947, Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Karl Mannheim Ideologie und Utopie , 2015, Ideologie und Utopie.