The interminable issue of effectiveness: substantive purposes, outcomes and research challenges in the advancement of environmental impact assessment theory

An analysis of studies of the outcomes of environmental impact assessment (EIA) indicates that its role in consent and design decisions is limited, due primarily to passive integration with the decision processes it is intended to inform. How much EIA helps sustainable development is largely unknown, but it is hypothesised that it is more than is typically assumed, through a plethora of causes, including emancipation of stakeholders and incremental change in the bureaucracy, companies and scientific institutions. To enhance the effectiveness of EIA, research should focus more on theory about the nature and operation of diverse causal processes, even though the concepts, methods and analytical challenges would be substantial.

[1]  Matthew Asa Cashmore,et al.  The role of science in environmental impact assessment: process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory , 2004 .

[2]  Alan Bond,et al.  Dealing with the cultural heritage aspect of environmental impact assessment in Europe , 2004 .

[3]  Pamela J. Shoemaker,et al.  How to Build Social Science Theories , 2003 .

[4]  J. F. Benson,et al.  What is the alternative? Impact assessment tools and sustainable planning , 2003 .

[5]  David P. Lawrence,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment: Practical Solutions to Recurrent Problems , 2003 .

[6]  Ytsen Deelstra,et al.  Using knowledge for decision-making purposes in the context of large projects in The Netherlands , 2003 .

[7]  Hugh Wilkins,et al.  The need for subjectivity in EIA: discourse as a tool for sustainable development , 2003 .

[8]  Frank Vanclay,et al.  International Principles For Social Impact Assessment , 2003 .

[9]  Fred Phillips,et al.  The distortion of criteria after decision-making , 2002 .

[10]  A. Duthie.  A review of provincial environmental impact assessment administrative capacity in South Africa , 2001 .

[11]  Holger Dalkmann,et al.  DECISION MAKING AND STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT , 2001 .

[12]  Tracey Nitz,et al.  SEA MUST LEARN HOW POLICY MAKING WORKS , 2001 .

[13]  Lieselotte Feldmann,et al.  The EU's SEA Directive: status and links to integration and sustainable development , 2001 .

[14]  W. Thissen,et al.  Rationality in decision- and policy-making: implications for strategic environmental assessment , 2000 .

[15]  Tracey Nitz,et al.  Does environmental impact assessment facilitate environmental management activities , 2000 .

[16]  Joe Weston,et al.  EIA, Decision-making Theory and Screening and Scoping in UK Practice , 2000 .

[17]  Carys Jones,et al.  Auditing the Assessment of the Environmental Impacts of Planning Projects , 2000 .

[18]  Robert V. Bartlett,et al.  The Theory of Environmental Impact Assessment: Implicit models of policy making , 1999 .

[19]  Adam Barker,et al.  An evaluation of EIA system performance in eight EU countries , 1999 .

[20]  A. Chadwick,et al.  Introduction to environmental impact assessment , 2013 .

[21]  Clive George,et al.  Testing for sustainable development through environmental assessment , 1999 .

[22]  Richard K. Morgan.  Environmental impact assessment : a methodological perspective , 1998 .

[23]  A. Porter,et al.  Environmental Methods Review: Retooling Impact Assessment for the New Century , 1998 .

[24]  Anne Shepherd,et al.  Beyond the Requirements: Improving Public Participation in EIA , 1997 .

[25]  Janet Crawford,et al.  Planning under a Co-operative Mandate: New Plans for New Zealand , 1997 .

[26]  Carys Jones,et al.  The Effect of Environmental Assessment on UK Local Planning Authority Decisions , 1997 .

[27]  Elizabeth Wilson,et al.  EIA-Learning from Experience: Changes in the Quality of Environmental Impact Statements for UK Planning Projects , 1997 .

[28]  Ernst ten Heuvelhof,et al.  The effects of environmental impact assessment in the Netherlands , 1997 .

[29]  David P. Lawrence,et al.  The need for EIA theory-building , 1997 .

[30]  Joe Weston,et al.  Planning and Environmental Impact Assessment in Practice , 1997 .

[31]  Adam Barker,et al.  Evaluation of the Performance of the EIA Process , 1996 .

[32]  Erik Mostert,et al.  SUBJECTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: CAUSES, PROBLEMS, SOLUTIONS , 1996 .

[33]  William C. Sullivan,et al.  ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS ON CITIZENS , 1996 .

[34]  Wen-Shyan Leu,et al.  Quality control mechanisms and environmental impact assessment effectiveness with special reference to the UK , 1996 .

[35]  Richard C. Hill,et al.  Decision Scoping: Making EA Learn How the Design Process Works , 1995 .

[36]  Lex Brown,et al.  Going beyond environmental impact assessment: Environmental input to planning and design , 1995 .

[37]  Richard K. Morgan.  Progress with Implementing the Environmental Assessment Requirements of the Resource Management Act in New Zealand , 1995 .

[38]  D.V.J. Bell,et al.  The politics of sustainability , 1995, Proceedings 1995 Interdisciplinary Conference: Knowledge Tools for a Sustainable Civilization. Fourth Canadian Conference on Foundations and Applications of General Science Theory.

[39]  N. Lee.  Environmental assessment in the European Union: a tenth anniversary , 1995 .

[40]  R. Beattie,et al.  Everything you already know about EIA (but don't often admit) , 1995 .

[41]  Norman Lee,et al.  Assessing the performance of the EA process , 1994 .

[42]  D. P. Lawrence.  Designing and adapting the EIA planning process , 1994 .

[43]  Norman Lee,et al.  The role of environmental assessment in the planning and authorisation of extractive industry projects , 1993 .

[44]  Alan S. Miller.  The role of analytical science in natural resource decision making , 1993 .

[45]  Dennis L. Meadows,et al.  Beyond the limits: Global collapse or a sustainable future , 1993 .

[46]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Dynamic models and large scale field experiments in environmental impact assessment and management , 1993 .

[47]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  Beyond the limits: global collapse or a sustainable future? , 1992 .

[48]  Norman Lee,et al.  Quality control in environmental assessment , 1992 .

[49]  Lynton K. Caldwell,et al.  ANALYSIS-ASSESSMENT-DECISION: THE ANATOMY OF RATIONAL POLICYMAKING , 1991 .

[50]  Norman Lee,et al.  Reviewing the quality of environmental statements: review methods and findings , 1991 .

[51]  Valerie Hobbs,et al.  A proposed framework and database for EIA auditing , 1990 .

[52]  Peter Duinker,et al.  Forecasting Environmental Impacts: Better Quantitative and Wrong Than Qualitative and Untestable , 1985 .

[53]  Peter N. Duinker,et al.  An Ecological Framework for Environmental Impact Assessment , 1984 .

[54]  L. Caldwell,et al.  Science and the National Environmental Policy Act , 1982 .

[55]  David M. Rosenberg,et al.  Recent Trends in Environmental Impact Assessment , 1981 .

[56]  R. Patrick,et al.  Environmental Assessment , 2021, Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure.

[57]  G. Fishbein,et al.  Setting environmental standards. , 1975, Journal of environmental health.

[58]  Alvin M. Weinberg,et al.  Science and trans-science , 1972, Nature.

[59]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[60]  C. Lindblom.  THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[61]  J. Petts,et al.  Handbook of environmental impact assessment. Volume 1: environmental impact assessment: process, methods and potential. , 1999 .

[62]  Judith Petts,et al.  Environmental impact assessment in practice : impact and limitations , 1999 .

[63]  Judith Petts,et al.  Handbook of environmental impact assessment , 1999 .

[64]  Lars Emmelin,et al.  Evaluating environmental impact assessment systems ‐ part 1: Theoretical and methodological considerations , 1998 .

[65]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  Environmental science for environmental management , 1995 .

[66]  Christopher Wood,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review , 1995 .

[67]  R. B. McLean,et al.  Reasons and strategies for more effective NEPA implementation , 1993 .

[68]  Bruce C. Straits,et al.  Approaches to social research , 1993 .

[69]  R. Turner.  Sustainable environmental economics and management : principles and practice , 1993 .

[70]  Thomas J. Gallagher,et al.  The readability of federal land management plans , 1989 .

[71]  E. Barbier,et al.  Blueprint for a green economy , 1989 .

[72]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[73]  S. Hart.  Improving Impact Assessment , 1986 .

[74]  Peter N. Duinker,et al.  AN ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN CANADA. , 1983 .

[75]  Andrew Gamble,et al.  An introduction to modern social and political thought , 1981 .

[76]  R. Munn,et al.  Environmental impact assessment : principles and procedures , 1979 .

[77]  R. Munn,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment , 1977 .

[78]  G. Campbell,et al.  An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics , 1977 .