Justification for Use of a Single Trichrome Stain as the Sole Means for Routine Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Concentrated Stool Specimens

ABSTRACT Of 12,321 stool samples analyzed over a 6-year interval, 870 (7.1%) were positive for a total of 1,019 parasites, of which 1,011 (99.2%) were found in trichrome-stained smears of unconcentrated specimens while only 479 (47.0%) were detected in iodine-stained smears of concentrated samples. Stool specimens were next analyzed by trichrome staining of both unconcentrated and concentrated specimens preserved in either mercury-polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) or cupric PVA. Of 2,198 specimens, 171 (7.8%) were positive for a total of 208 parasites, 192 (92.3%) and 204 (98.1%) of which were found in the unconcentrated and concentrated specimens, respectively (P < 0.05). In our patient population, examination of a single trichrome-stained smear of a concentrated stool specimen is a cost-effective alternative to routinely analyzing both concentrated and unconcentrated specimens for parasites.

[1]  L. Garcia,et al.  Evaluation of Intestinal Protozoan Morphology in Human Fecal Specimens Preserved in EcoFix: Comparison of Wheatley’s Trichrome Stain and EcoStain , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[2]  D. Hale,et al.  Use of a single slide trichrome-stained concentrate for the detection of intestinal parasites. Stained concentration procedure for ova and parasites. , 1996, American journal of clinical pathology.

[3]  D. Bruckner,et al.  Evaluation of intestinal protozoan morphology in polyvinyl alcohol preservative: comparison of zinc sulfate- and mercuric chloride-based compounds for use in Schaudinn's fixative , 1993, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[4]  D. Hale,et al.  Use of Hemo-De to eliminate toxic agents used for concentration and trichrome staining of intestinal parasites , 1992, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[5]  R. Pickering.  Biostatistics and Epidemiology: A primer for Health Professionals , 1991 .

[6]  I. Nachamkin,et al.  Direct wet mounts versus concentration for routine parasitological examination: are both necessary? , 1988, American journal of clinical pathology.

[7]  L. Garcia.  Diagnostic Medical Parasitology , 1988 .

[8]  B. Kleger,et al.  Hemo-De as substitute for ethyl acetate in formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique , 1987, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[9]  J. A. Levine,et al.  Examination of preserved stool specimens for parasites: lack of value of the direct wet mount , 1985, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[10]  D. Bruckner,et al.  Evaluation of intestinal parasite morphology in polyvinyl alcohol preservative: comparison of copper sulfate and mercuric chloride bases for use in Schaudinn fixative , 1983, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[11]  L. M. de la Maza,et al.  Detection of helminth ova and larvae in trichrome-stained stool smears , 1982, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[12]  W. P. Horen.  Modification of Schaudinn fixative , 1981, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[13]  D. D. del Junco,et al.  Comparison of direct wet mount and trichrome staining techniques for detecting Entamoeba species trophozoites in stools , 1980, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[14]  E. Bruck,et al.  National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. , 1980, Pediatrics.

[15]  D. Bruckner,et al.  A comparison of the formalin-ether concentration and trichrome-stained smear methods for the recovery and identification of intestinal protozoa. , 1979, The American journal of medical technology.