Prediction of Higher Heating Value of Solid Biomass Fuels Using Artificial Intelligence Formalisms

The higher heating value (HHV) is an important property defining the energy content of biomass fuels. A number of proximate and/or ultimate analysis based predominantly linear correlations have been proposed for predicting the HHV of biomass fuels. A scrutiny of the relationships between the constituents of the proximate and ultimate analyses and the corresponding HHVs suggests that all relationships are not linear and thus nonlinear models may be more appropriate. Accordingly, a novel artificial intelligence (AI) formalism, namely genetic programming (GP) has been employed for the first time for developing two biomass HHV prediction models, respectively using the constituents of the proximate and ultimate analyses as the model inputs. The prediction and generalization performance of these models was compared rigorously with the corresponding multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network based as also currently available high-performing linear and nonlinear HHV models. This comparison reveals that the HHV prediction performance of the GP and MLP models is consistently better than that of their existing linear and/or nonlinear counterparts. Specifically, the GP- and MLP-based models exhibit an excellent overall prediction accuracy and generalization performance with high (>0.95) magnitudes of the coefficient of correlation and low (<4.5 %) magnitudes of mean absolute percentage error in respect of the experimental and model-predicted HHVs. It is also found that the proximate analysis-based GP model has outperformed all the existing high-performing linear biomass HHV prediction models. In the case of ultimate analysis-based HHV models, the MLP model has exhibited best prediction accuracy and generalization performance when compared with the existing linear and nonlinear models. The AI-based models introduced in this paper due to their excellent performance have the potential to replace the existing biomass HHV prediction models.

[1]  Charles Leave.  Neural Networks: Algorithms, Applications and Programming Techniques , 1992 .

[2]  Konstantinos Ioannou,et al.  Evaluation of artificial neural networks as a model for forecasting consumption of wood products , 2013, Int. J. Data Anal. Tech. Strateg..

[3]  R. K. Dahule,et al.  Obtaining functional form for chaotic time series evolution using genetic algorithm. , 1999, Chaos.

[4]  Tomás Cordero,et al.  Predicting heating values of lignocellulosics and carbonaceous materials from proximate analysis , 2001 .

[5]  K. Moore,et al.  Biomass Yield and Quality of Reed Canarygrass under Five Harvest Management Systems for Bioenergy Production , 2011, BioEnergy Research.

[6]  B. Kulkarni,et al.  Development of data-driven models for fluidized-bed coal gasification process , 2012 .

[7]  Douglas B. Kell,et al.  Real-time vapour sensing using an OFET-based electronic nose and genetic programming , 2009 .

[8]  C. Yin.  Prediction of higher heating values of biomass from proximate and ultimate analyses , 2011 .

[9]  J. Azevedo,et al.  Estimating the higher heating value of biomass fuels from basic analysis data , 2005 .

[10]  William B. Langdon,et al.  Some Considerations on the Reason for Bloat , 2002, Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines.

[11]  Ingo Mierswa,et al.  YALE: rapid prototyping for complex data mining tasks , 2006, KDD '06.

[12]  David J. Murray-Smith,et al.  Nonlinear model structure identification using genetic programming , 1998 .

[13]  P. Abdul Salam,et al.  Estimation of higher heating value of biomass from proximate analysis: A new approach , 2012 .

[14]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[15]  Sanjeev S. Tambe,et al.  Estimation of gross calorific value of coals using artificial neural networks , 2007 .

[16]  Peter Nordin,et al.  Genetic programming - An Introduction: On the Automatic Evolution of Computer Programs and Its Applications , 1998 .

[17]  L. Jiménez,et al.  Study of the physical and chemical properties of lignocellulosic residues with a view to the production of fuels , 1991 .

[18]  C. Posten,et al.  Second Generation Biofuels: High-Efficiency Microalgae for Biodiesel Production , 2008, BioEnergy Research.

[19]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Distilling Free-Form Natural Laws from Experimental Data , 2009, Science.

[20]  S. Channiwala,et al.  A UNIFIED CORRELATION FOR ESTIMATING HHV OF SOLID, LIQUID AND GASEOUS FUELS , 2002 .

[21]  T. A. Milne,et al.  Sourcebook of Methods of Analysis for Biomass and Biomass Conversion Processes , 1989 .

[22]  Konstantinos Ioannou,et al.  Predicting fuelwood prices in Greece with the use of ARIMA models, artificial neural networks and a hybrid ARIMA–ANN model , 2009 .

[23]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[24]  Yu-Gang Li,et al.  Stochastic GP synthesis of heat integrated nonsharp distillation sequences , 2010 .

[25]  K. Varmuza,et al.  Prediction of heating values of biomass fuel from elemental composition , 2005 .

[26]  Sanjeev S. Tambe,et al.  Hybrid process modeling and optimization strategies integrating neural networks/support vector regression and genetic algorithms: study of benzene isopropylation on Hbeta catalyst , 2004 .

[27]  IEA bioenergy Task 32: biomass combustion and cofiring. , 2002 .

[28]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  A Field Guide to Genetic Programming , 2008 .

[29]  Kenneth Hennessy,et al.  An improved genetic programming technique for the classification of Raman spectra , 2004, Knowl. Based Syst..

[30]  John R. Koza,et al.  Genetic programming - on the programming of computers by means of natural selection , 1993, Complex adaptive systems.

[31]  Ugur Kesgin,et al.  Genetic algorithm and artificial neural network for engine optimisation of efficiency and NOx emission , 2004 .

[32]  S. Channiwala,et al.  A correlation for calculating HHV from proximate analysis of solid fuels , 2005 .